Comments on: ZIRPS CAUSED INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CAR CRASH

By: emsnews

emsnews — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:47:26 +0000

Joe 5 Pack.

And Nah’s writing isn’t Pynchonesque but rather more like the Dead Parrot of Monty Pythoneque works.

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:37:28 +0000

Actually Nah’s writing reminds me of James
Joyce or Thomas Pynchon. It might be a “stream
of consciousness” type of thing.

By: Rowan

Rowan — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:14:35 +0000

The German word “Narr” means “Fool” but it also means “Court Jester”-the only person who can speak the forbidden truths. Nah`s writing style and execrable spelling and grammar reminds me that the vast population of badly educated and manipulated people are never represented on these forums. “Joe six-pack” is not so dumb as many university-educated people think – it doesn`t help to look down upon him in the same way as we are looked down upon by those who live in the Rothschild-Rockefeller Heaven (if you can call it that). They are controlling education at ALL levels, after all.

By: Grok1

Grok1 — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:17:21 +0000

Elaine and readers should find this December 3RD Charlie Rose interview with Nassim Taleb very interesting.

http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/9713

By: DeVaul

DeVaul — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:12:32 +0000

Nah,
:
Who do you work for and why do they pay you?
:
Are you a “tester” at a bourbon wharehouse?

By: nah

nah — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:59:36 +0000

so its like woo-hoo supply side economics were the smartest people but we dont protect our businesses which drives compitition with foreighn sources driving wages down not revenus up we trade our retarded ‘promisary’ polotics i guess… watched some IOUSA at least someone is saying your retarded politics this is a powerful country where did you come from? cant believe people can talk about supply side economics like its not fools gold from the mid 1900s. got riots in greece ’socialist leftists’ cuz if you play ball you dont win and bankers walk free preying for more. its sic that 100yrs of US power expansion is in jeprody of being a complete waste. there is no amount of money that makes ‘playing ball’ so that it should seem cheep these bankers need prison like banks need money. if only because americans die’ to live like this.

http://www.cahrecords.com lol common

vote your paycheck

By: G

Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:23:33 +0000

Your article seems to make the case for an ‘Operational’ bailout of industries such as Automotive, in which $35 billion seems to be only a down payment on the total cost (which none can foresee accurately).

Strangely, the American public seems averse to this. Perhaps the sting of the failed asset bailout for financial firms has given them the wrong idea, i.e., the asset bailout was costly to taxpayers and the auto bailout will be as well, and the result of the latter will be equally as much failure as the former.

But who benefits and who really pays?

According to the Congressional Budget office, “Of the 138 million households who file tax returns, only about 16 million, or 11 percent, earn enough to pay more to the feds in taxes than they get back in services.”

In other words, if the Swells and lobbyists wish to grant themselves a bailout for which only they will ultimately be liable for repayment, of what concern is that to the overwhelming majority of Americans who have, as they say, ‘No skin in the game’?

Similarly, if Congress can be persuaded to grant a concession to other groups (‘Operational’ or otherwise), how does this affect most Americans, for whom taxes are more imaginary than real?

A Devil’s advocate may well say the following:
If a bailout (Operational or not) leads to a continuation of functioning industries that provide employment to millions and no real impact on ‘taxpayers’, how can this be a bad thing? In the end, less than 15% of Americans will pay for these bailouts and the remainder will benefit greatly. A pleasant outcome, n’est-ce pas?