June 16, 2009...5:18 pm

The Nature Of Dog/Human Evolution

Jump to Comments

Picture 10The human mind is a marvelous tool.   It is the most important tool humans use, more important than the opposable thumbs or the upright walking.  Tools would have barely evolved just like in the chimpanzee communities, if we didn’t have brains that  then processed MEMORIES.  Remembering to carry a tool all over the place and to spend considerable time, finding the rocks to make the tools, shaping the rocks and then shaping the right sticks so rocks and sticks could be used to create weapsons: without a powerful internal memory device, this would have been impossible.

Picture 10

Evolution News: Early Homo Sapiens And Their Dogs Hunted And Killed Neanderthals

When people lose their memories, they are literally lost.  The world ceases making sense and often, Alzheimer’s patients simply try to wander off.  This is a terrible business.  But this happens to whole societies, too.  Huge hunks of common memory systems, immense tracts of history can and do vanish and only with greatest difficulty, can it be only partially rediscovered via, say, archeology.  History is constantly being written and rewritten and there is always tension about this as people try madly to wipe out history while inserting their own histories in place of the more accurate records.

The discovery that mass media can be abused in this fashion has been exploited by all ruling elites but this impulse runs in many humans of every possible sort: many want a narrative written by themselves and in doing this, can evolve a story line over time, as it morphs and changes, getting stranger and stranger, more and more detached from the original, it eventually becomes ‘mythology’ and relies entirely on ‘belief’ to maintain itself.

Before I go into that process as it pertains to religious dogma, the ultimate belief-alteration systems, I want to talk about how human perceptions can directly impact on reality by selectively choosing things that appeal to a dogma.  In honor of the word, ‘dogma’, I wish to talk about the very first thing on earth that humans deliberately genetically altered via ‘domestication’: dogs were the very first living creature we manipulated deliberately.

‘Dogma’ comes from the Greek word for ‘decent’.  That is, ‘honorable, good or handsome’.  ’Dogma’ has come to mean, ‘established opinions and morals’.  It was first used in texts in 1638, right on the eve of the Glorious Revolution.  A Catholic king ascended to the Throne and tried to suppress the Protestants.  The uprising in Scotland is directly connected with the creation of this new word in the English language.  This is why ‘dogma’ has negative connotations: this word was used to describe the King’s attempt at imposing intellectual and religious conformity on the fractious empire.

Wolf to Woof: The Evolution of Dogs @ nationalgeographic.com

About 12,000 years ago hunter-gatherers in what is now Israel placed a body in a grave with its hand cradling a pup. Whether it was a dog or a wolf can’t be known. Either way, the burial is among the earliest fossil evidence of the dog’s domestication. Scientists know the process was under way by about 14,000 years ago but do not agree on why. Some argue that humans adopted wolf pups and that natural selection favored those less aggressive and better at begging for food. Others say dogs domesticated themselves by adapting to a new niche—human refuse dumps. Scavenging canids that were less likely to flee from people survived in this niche, and succeeding generations became increasingly tame. According to biologist Raymond Coppinger: “All that was selected for was that one trait—the ability to eat in proximity to people.” At the molecular level not much changed at all: The DNA makeup of wolves and dogs is almost identical.

But the very first expression of the concept of ‘dogma’ was with the human/canine interactions during the last Ice Age.  Because humans living in Australia, North and South America as well as all of Eurasia and northern Africa all have dogs since their earliest years, we know that the dog/human relationship is very ancient.  The dog/human relationship also is very significant in religious terms.  The earliest dogs were most likely scavengers who slunk away from the Ice Age hunters.  But I guess that, for pure amusement some tribe in the great steppes must have picked up some of these scavenger wolf puppies who were probably abandoned by their mother, and finding them immense roly-poly fun, were kept as the first pets.

We know that Amazonian tribes, just for example, will capture parrots and other small animals and keep them for pets.  The dogs, on the other hand, were useful pets.  This discovery was probably accidental.  The playful pups who grew up being nurtured by the humans [human mothers even in recent eras, have nursed puppies!] bonded to the humans and considered them part of the wolf pack.  So when strange humans showed up, instead of the normal process of checking each other out, the wolf dogs could sense hostility from much further away via the scent people give off when they have rising adrenaline.

On top of being able to ’sniff out’ danger, the wolf/dogs made tremendous noise when anything, human or nonhuman, approached what the wolf/dogs considered to be the joint ‘nursery’.  That is, they treated other human groups as invading wolf packs and acted accordingly, with all the fighting adult wolf/dogs running to the outer perimeter and stationing themselves right next to the warriors who grasped their spears in an attitude of aggression.  The wolf/dogs were not as aggressive as wild wolves because the humans would not tolerate this.  Alpha wolf/dogs were killed by the humans.  The beta wolf/dogs were rewarded for showing deference to the humans.

It has been noticed by more than one researcher, how humans operate more like wolf packs than fellow primates.  This could be why we trend towards having ‘kings’ and ‘queens’ just like wolf packs have Alphas.  The natural tendency to seek out and follow some Alpha human or to elevate some human to this god-like status is very strong in humans.  The humans who first tamed the wolves and then figured out how to meld themselves into the wolf social matrix were extremely successful.  That is, they and their wolf pack allies could hunt down and kill all rival human groups.

There is little doubt in my mind that the annihilation of the Neanderthals in Eurasia were directly due to these human/wolf hunters killing them.  The human/wolf matrix triumphed over all others.  Homo Sapiens was a formidable danger to all other humanoids starting 100,000 years ago but the aggression levels shot up dramatically with the introduction of these four-legged allies.  For they are swifter than humans on foot.  And they smell tracks and trails much better and even have better eyesight for moving objects on the distant horizon.

In the competition for resources, the human/wolf pack unity won out over all other social configurations because the humans could ‘howl’ along with the wolves and this noise would alert all other humanoids to flee the region.  So evolution favored noisy, screaming, howling humans who basically imitated their wolf allies in noise levels.  Indeed, the entire reason all human babies and small children love to scream, yodel and yell so much, so loudly, it nearly deafens us, is because this was their prime protection.  No living creature, not even very similar humans who were not part of a wolf pack, would run as fast as possible, away from the racket created by the human/wolf children!

Even wolf puppies don’t make all that much noise.  Adult wolves, marking territory, do make loud noise.  So it is amazing and wondrous that human babies make as much noise as wolf pack alpha leaders.  And I would suggest, this is the actions of ancient human mothers who encouraged their babies to join in the ‘wolf howls’ at night as the humans and wolves sat around the campfires and raised their voices to the rising moon.  I know how this feels.  For, as a small child, I would sit with my dogs on the verandah of the ranch and we would begin howling at night and the coyotes would come out of the desert and howl back at us and then, I would stand up and brandish a large stick and give the ‘attack’ howls and the dogs would run with me into the desert.

Coyotes eat dogs when there are no humans around.  Dogs are mostly pretty helpless unless humans are nearby.  Wolves can eat humans, too, if there are no dogs.  But no coyote or wolf can beat nearly any human/dog alliance.  For example, once a bear decided to raid my bee hives.  My mastiff, Cleo and my husband and I ran outside and we said, ‘Bark!  Bark, Cleo!’  And then she roared at the bear while we joined her with equal noise.  The bear turned and ran off as fast as possible.  If it turned to fight, the mastiff would have risked her life to fight it for us. But only if we were joining in and yelling, ‘Attack!  Attack!’

Dogs are marvelous animals and a psychological extension of us humans.  And thanks to them, our society has evolved very heavily in a novel direction for a member of the monkey tribe.  I have lived with monkeys and dogs.  Monkeys consider dogs to be rivals and will plot against them and take advantage of them.  I never met a monkey that wanted to associate with dogs the way we humans do it.  Though it may be possible.

One characteristic of the wolf is their sense of loyalty.  A dog is the perfect sidekick.  All dogs are Robin to the Batman human owners.  Even if a human is cruel and beats the Robin/dog, it will still fight fiercely to protect this deranged Batman beater from all enemies or anyone who even dares to touch a hair on the head of the abuser!  This unthinking loyalty is the human ideal and we strive to impose it upon each other, each either accepting their social status and allying themselves with an alpha Batman and be a dog-like Robin.  Or they plot to overthrow the tyrant and replace it with themselves and then, of course, demand the same Batman/Robin-human/dog relationship.

I think a great deal of not only this strange social force but also, how human brains can manipulate and distort nature and reality.  Our brains are very large thanks to the need to remember so many things including, where we left the babies and the dogs, humans being wandering creatures.  Another reason why babies and puppies are so noisy, I bet.  The very first animal that humans began to change according to whim were these early dogs.  Very swiftly, by at least 12,000 years ago, dogs that had various talents and looks began to appear due to humans keeping only ones that had pleasing aspects desired by humans.  For example: spots, floppy ears or curled tails.  Yes, fashion played a role here.

Humans discovered rather quickly that if they kept only the puppies that looked a certain way, more and more puppies would appear in the dog pack that looked like the ones the humans wanted.  For some reason, humans like spots, for example.  So dogs with these have been quite popular.  Or rather, multi-colored dogs, that is.  We see this in horses.  For example, the Conquistadores brought horses to the New World in the 1500’s.  Some ran free after Coronado’s mission seeking the Cities of Gold failed.  These ran off to the Great Plains and very rapidly multiplied.  The Indians who learned to ride and tame these horses took a liking to having spotted horses and in less than 300 years, the Appaloosa horse evolved due to human selection.

The human/dog interaction, being the oldest, also has the greatest variety compared to all other domesticated animals.  Yet, all dogs are still so closely related to both wolves and coyotes, even, they can all bear each other’s young and mate.  This is a pretty certain sign that the ‘evolution’ imposed by humans is unnatural.  It is not due to natural selection but rather, often even trivial or ridiculous esthetic choices by the humans.  The best way to get fast changes in the looks or shape of a dog is to interbreed very closely so that defective or recessive genes dominate the cellular nature of the offspring.  The queer ways our brains work has been imposed on the dog population of the world and in the last 100 years, has become a serious hazard for our ancient dog buddies.  We are breeding freaks to the point, the dogs are virtually unable to even live, much less, function like the dogs of yore.

The Pekingese Club of America

Picture 2

As I mentioned, all dogs are natural born lovers of authority and dominance.  So kings, emperors and religious leaders have a soft spot for these camp followers.  The Emperors of China are no exception.  They are one of the people who ordered a wide variety of dogs to be bred for various purposes.  And one of these are the famous Pekingese lion lap dogs.  This picture here is from around 1800.  Note the size and shape of the dog: the front legs are very stunted but the rear end is still fairly strong.  The ears don’t fall much below the jaws and the faces are already very flat for a dog.  The tail is curled but is still obviously a tail and has a flag which the dog waves as a signal of friendliness and adoration of the alpha human.  From the official website:

During the Manchurian rule of Beijing (then Peking) from 1644 -1911, Pekingese and sleeve dogs became objects of trade with the Europeans. Pekingese with black-spotted tongues were a particular favorite in Europe. Chinese breeders wanted Pekingese attributes to conform to features in Buddhist lore and art. That’s why a Fu Dog is associated with the breed — what the Chinese refer to as “a lion.” In Chinese mythology, the Pekingese is said to be a cross between a lion and a tiny monkey (marmoset) and one can see how the myth prevails to this day. Small size and special markings were the highest valued traits, and the 4-5 pound “sleeve” Pekes with ferocious temperaments served as guard dogs which were concealed in the large sleeves of garments: “a surprise” that was literally “up one’s sleeve.”

All lap dogs have this feature. This is why they are twice as loud and persistent compared to say, Mastiffs, who don’t bother to bark unless there is real motivation and it has to be pretty big motivation to get them to bother. The smaller the dog, the more it will bark at strangers and the harder it is to convince it to stop barking.

In the 19th century, and no doubt earlier, Pekingese produced in rough and smooth coat varieties with the latter known as “Happa Dogs.” Through the free exchange of breeds in the palaces and monasteries in 17 th to 19 th century China and Tibet, Pekingese evolved and were crossed with every kind of dog: rough and smooth coated Pugs, Japanese Chin, Tibetan Spaniels, Lhasa Apsos, Shih Tzu, Tibetan Terriers, Chow Chows and other developing breeds.

Picture 9There was no ‘pure breeds’… there were regional types of dogs. And passing the genes from one to the other for various reasons, most often, quite whimsical, was very common before 1850. Here is a picture from 1903.  China was ruled by Europeans who tore it to pieces.  One thing that absolutely delighted the upper classes in Europe were the whimsical toy lap dogs bred by the Oriental elites all over Asia.  These were literally stolen and brought back to the West to be used as living toys.

This picture shows the grave distortions already plaguing these canines.  The pug, in particular, is very twisted.  The front legs are ridiculous and dangerous.  The faces of both have been relentlessly ‘humanized’ by moving the eyes to the front and smashing the nose in.  These strange dogs were embraced by Westerners and they decided to ‘keep the breed clean’ by forming a registry similar to the race horse Thoroughbred registers started in the 18th century.

This not only encouraged massive inbreeding unlike in Asia where there was frequent out-breeding, this also began a process of warping what a dog was and very rapidly evolving it into something entirely different via the judging process at dog shows.  A few months ago, the BBC ran an expose of this process with a documentary of how the British Kennel Club, one of the oldest on earth, how it used the judging process to totally destroy all the dog breeds.  Here is the episode on You Tube that concerns both the pug and the Pekingese dogs we see in the old photo here:

YouTube – Pedigree Dogs Exposed part 4

Picture 4The European ‘pug’ .  The word comes from a history of words talking about ‘fighting’.  This was an aggressive guard dog which was made smaller so it could take up little space.  Unlike the Mastiff breeds who mostly lived outside, these are indoor dogs.  This pug looks only slightly different from other pooches.  Its main features were the semi-curled tail and the short nose and floppy ears.   It was bred into the Asian court pugs and today, is this small monster of a dog with a bent spine, a very curled tail and all the ‘pug’ features extremely exaggerated.  The nose, so short, the dog can barely breathe.  The legs are also very short and the back so bad, the dogs can’t even climb stairs easily anymore.

Horrible as this is, the fate of the Pekingese was far worse: this merry little dog was transformed into this immense ball of fur with a face smashed to smithereens.  A very sad animal, one that horrifies me.

YouTube – Pedigree Dogs Exposed part 5

Picture 1

Here is the official 2009 mascot of the US Pekingese dog club.  The ears in the top pictures barely went past the chin of this breed 100 years ago.  Now, they drag on the ground.  The pert little tail with a slight curve has turned into a total corkscrew which is utterly buried in long fur.  This fur now covers the poor dog with a second layer of deep fur.

YouTube – Creation of the Pekingese Dog

From the website run by the strange people who have joined the British in utterly and totally destroying this breed of dog and turning it into a caterpillar covered with fatal levels of fur.  This is the decree of the mad, last Empress of China, the same one who ordered a navy of jade boats while Europe and Japan ravaged China:

The Pekingese Club of America

Let the Lion Dog be small; let it wear the swelling cape of dignity around its neck; let it display the billowing standard of pomp above its back.

Let its face be black; let its fore-front be shaggy; let its forehead be straight and low, like the brow of an Imperial righteous harmony boxer.

Let its eyes be large and luminous; let its ears be set like the sails of a war-junk; let its nose be like the monkey god of the Hindus.

Let its forelegs be bent, so that it shall not desire to wander far, or leave the Imperial precincts. Let its body be shaped like that of a hunting lion spying for its prey.

Let its feet be tufted with plentiful hair that its footfall may be soundless; and for its standard of pomp let it rival the whisk of the Tibetan’s yak, which flourished to protect the Imperial litter from the attacks of flying insects.

Let it venerate its ancestors and deposit offerings in the Canine Cemetery of The Forbidden City on each new moon. And for its color – let it be that of a lion, a golden sable, to be carried in the sleeve of a yellow robe – or the color of a red bear, or a black and white bear – or stripped like a dragon – so that there may be dogs appropriate to every costume in the Imperial wardrobe.

Let it comport itself with dignity; let it learn to bite the foreign devils instantly.

I find the business about biting foreign devils to be rather funny.  The ultimate function of dogs is to protect the alpha owners.  Note also, how these unfortunate dogs were fashion accessories.  We see movie and TV goddesses doing the same thing, carting around these little dogs all over the place.  Any animal can be bred to look like anything and this has been imposed on more and more species as humans interfere with other animals.  For example, chickens have been subjected to this for hundreds of years, too.  The ‘Standards of Perfection’ have been used to keep various varieties ‘pure’.

The difference between the bible of bird breeders which used illustrations back in the 19th century, lovely pictures showing several angles of bird breeding perfection, is in stark contrast with the British Kennel Club which uses NO pictures of ‘perfection’ at all.  So over time, the breeds warp more and more, based on their VERBAL and WRITTEN descriptions.  This is quite shocking because virtually all breeds of dogs no longer even remotely resemble their ‘breeds’ 100 years ago!  Instead, as judging fads and whims pass over the dog population, they  move in various directions like water flowing.  So, if 2″ of fur is good, 3″ is better and then 5″ and then 20″ of fur until the fur is dragged on the ground, for example.

Here is the photo of the very best ‘dog’ in the top British show back in 2003:

Picture 7

Picture 8

This pathetic creature needed surgery in order to breathe!  The people who bred dogs to this sorry state should die of shame or maybe strangle themselves on a curtain pull or fall over a tea cart and break their necks.

Scots experts urges BBC to drop Crufts over cruel treatment of dogs – The Sunday Mail

A SCOTS animal cruelty expert yesterday demanded the BBC axe coverage of Crufts dog show.

Mike Flynn, of the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, spoke out after Panorama’s expose of the horrific health problems suffered by pedigree dogs as a result of in-breeding.

The documentary, screened on Friday, revealed many have life-threatening brain conditions, epilepsy, heart murmurs and cancers.

The BBC has shown highlights from Crufts for 42 years but Flynn demanded they pull out unless breeders’ body The Kennel Club do more to stop in-breeding….

Pugs are so inbred that although there are 10,000 in Britain, their DNA could come from just 50.

The Pekingese’s flat face causes breathing problems meaning some airlines refuse to fly them.

The 2003 Crufts winner Danny – a Pekingese owned by Scot, Bert Easdon – needed surgery to help it breathe.

The trusting dogs who first formed an alliance with humans have been slowly turned into a genetic sport of intense cruelty.  The prime features of a strong dog have been bred out just so we can have ‘looks’ and the ‘looks’ evolve in horrible ways as various funky things are emphasized.  For example, the ruff of fur on the Pekingese dogs was turned into a full body of fur and then, encouraged to cover all parts of the dog until it was unable to survive.  The winner of that Cruft’s show, for example, was so overheated in less than an hour, it had to sit on an ice pack for photos!  This is beyond cruel.  I once had an Scottish Rough Sheepdog.  We had to shave her in summer or she would die.  Her fur finally was the death of her.  Our mongrel, on the other hand, can shed her winter fur the same way wolves do this.

Picture 5

Here is another prime example as to how dogs that were already being bred in odd ways in the 19th century have suddenly deteriorated as breeders emphasize more and more, various bizarre traits:

Here is a late 19th century photo of a French Bassett Hound.  A perky dog with a very erect tail, evolved from the standard hunting hound dog used for the sport of fox hunting.  The ears are floppier than the longer-legged hunting hounds.  Still, it could run and chase and was full of energy.

YouTube – Pedigree Dogs Exposed part 5

Here is a grand champion in Britain from last year:

Picture 6It is much, much fatter.  The ears are very long and quite prone to ear diseases since the dog can no longer perk up its ears even partially.  They sag.  So does the muzzle.  The skin around the eyes sags, giving it a sad expression which is in stark contrast  with the alert expression on the older dog’s face.  And the whole body’s skin sags!  And this is considered a positive thing for the judges who reward sagging skin!

So every generation, the skin sags worse and worse.  This will end only with the dogs being so compromised, they can’t have babies anymore.  Already, bulldogs can’t naturally conceive if they are the top breeders!

This process afflicts horses, cows, pigs, lab rats, plants, trees, etc: everything we choose to ‘breed’ we send off into various odd directions.  The Kennel Club, for example, never set any VISUAL standards so they have allowed whims to run amok and wrecked nearly all pure bred dogs this way.  But now we have genetic splicing and can make glow in the dark dogs, for example, like they did in South Korea.

The human mind at work is more like Dr. Frankenstein.  But this is part of the way our minds ALWAYS worked, from the very first interactions with the wolves during the Ice Ages.  They are the ones who showed us how to manipulate genetic material to suit our whims.  And this ability has infected our minds in surprising ways.  This is why humans keep turning ourselves into ‘gods’.  We feel, if the wolves we altered view us as gods, then we are gods!  Even humans in historical times have been elevated to ‘godhood’ thanks to this glitch in our minds.

It never ceases to amaze me to see people fall into this trap.  People can’t worship dogs or cats anymore like our distant ancestors.  We think, they worship us [well, cats are the exception, they pretty much refuse to do this and are very insistent of keeping their earlier god status] so why can’t we be gods in all ways?  And so we do this, it is very simple: if enough people can convince other people that someone has special skills such as say, healing, or they have a special biological relationship with gods [via divine sex] or that they can ride up to the heavens and discuss things directly with the invisible [ultimate Wolf] gods, we can rule our own destinies and dictate terms concerning our passage into Death.

This important process of the human mind is always operational.  It will latch onto anything and everything possible.  This is why we are very prone to building belief systems which please us or makes us feel better or stronger.  This is why we can’t process data in a cold way, even the best scientists are enslaved by this mental system that evolved with the human/wolf matrix of thousands of years ago.  Due to this, we struggle to see even small parts of ‘reality’.  The funniest thing here is, the animals we are messing up are still an open door to ‘reality’: they connect us to it in many subtle ways.

You can’t fool these animals.  They have their own ‘reality’ and we can only change their circumstances, we can’t change their perceptions.  This is why they are so good for us when we are going insane.  They comfort and protect us.  Well, the cats might toy with us… heh…. cats are a different in some ways.  We alter their fur and other things but can’t change their attitude that we are scum and they are gods.  It is no surprise that the Bible NEVER mentions cats.  I guess the god involved can’t handle this business and thinks, if it is ignored, it will go away.  I tell Fluff this periodically and he yawns and then stares at me.

I tell my puppy this and she wags her tail and jumps up and down with joy.  See?  Amusing.  The main thing is, if we are convinced about understanding any matrix system, EVEN PEOPLE CREATING THESE SYSTEMS, including all rulers, all of them are DELUSIONAL.  This is due to the warped brains thinking we are gods, not jerks.  But this is why cats consent to live with us.  Someone has to tell us the truth.  We can’t get this from dogs.  They love us too much.

sunset borger

side picture begging boneEmail:

emeinel@fairpoint.net

MAILING ADDRESS:

EMS NEWS

P.O. BOX 483

BERLIN, NY 12022

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO THIS WEBSITE

sunset borger

44 Comments

  • Our family recently got a mixed breed dog (she’s a great dog with a friendly temperament) and some of our friends from the “purebreed” crowd howled about how cruel this was. Huh? Admittedly our dog is a “designer dog.”

    But, I was told how damaging this is to the individual dog pedigrees; that we’ll end up with just one mongrel breed if we mix, ya see. Again huh? This sacred pedigree stuff sounds alot like doggie racism to me.

    There is a raging war between the mixed breed vs. pure breed camps out there.

    Thanks for your post.

  • Additionally, you write:

    “The earliest dogs were most likely scavengers who slunk away from the Ice Age hunters. But I guess that, for pure amusement some tribe in the great steppes must have picked up some of these scavenger wolf puppies who were probably abandoned by their mother, and finding them immense roly-poly fun, were kept as the first pets.”

    Many have noted that early man, perhaps before he learned to hunt, was in fact a scavenger. Man scavenged the remnants of larger animal (bears, wolves,etc.) kills.

    You write, ” Alpha wolf/dogs were killed by the humans. The beta wolf/dogs were rewarded for showing deference to the humans.”

    Or is it that dogs, as pack animals, show deference to protect the new “alpha dog”, in this case man.

    So I agree with your point that dogs do not purely emulate humans — we in many respects have the same “pack animal” proclivities as they and are more alike that we think.

  • I have an Imperial Shih-Tzu named feverdor. He is the most beautiful puppy ever!!! He does look kinda human though. He looks straight at you, and he is difficult to train. However, his hearing is bar-none the best of any dog ive owned, and you can’t hear him walk. Hes like a viper if you move suddenly. Everyone should have a precious Shih-Tzu puppy to love. They are so damn cute.

  • Thank you for these articles. I really liked the cat virus article too. It put a smile on my face for couple of days just thinking about it.
    “Must pet the cat” great stuff.

    Trivia:
    The old measurement for distance in my country is called “peninkulma” = etymology possibly from penin (genitive singular of peni, “dog”) + kuulua (“to be heard”) + -ma, the “distance a dog can be heard from”.

    On our farm where I lived as a child we had a karelian bear dog. Best bear dog in the World, still miss him sometimes. He was called “Peni”. (yeah I know that´s sounds bad in english ;) )
    Wiki:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karelian_Bear_Dog

    Video:

  • Animals, some of the finest creatures i have known, once had a cat, rejected at first, it was forever gratefull we took it in and loved it, last thing it did was to tell me so.
    Everything is smart, bugs even bacteria. Smarter than some people, for they do no harm.

  • I agree that some breeds of dogs are really twisted and should not really exist. Then again, most of the breeds that humans still use for something are usually mostly good. But in the long run, too much inbreeding will only lead to trouble.

    My parents had a dog, which made puppies twice. She was really a tad afraid of loud noises and a bit wary of strangers, but very friendly after anyone gained the initial trust. She did not bark at all first.

    One day my father (dunno if he was kidding or not) said that come on, dog should bark when visitors come in. Then he watched out of window with the dog and he “barked” few times when someone passed by on the road. It took only few times when our dog started doing it too.

    Ever since she barked few times whenever doorbell rang. But if the visitor did not ring the doorbell (some close relatives did this), then she made a really big ruckus out of it. Unless the visitor entered with a family member; then she did not care at all.

    She was very obedient, but also protective. Whenever meeting other dogs, she was very confident, maybe for protecting the herd? When we kept one puppy from the second time, this was especially obvious.

    This puppy grew also very confident. He played with her very fiercely and often, making “angry” sounds but whenever either yipped a tad, they instantly stopped to see if anything serious had happened. Visitors seemed almost scared when they really went at it, but we knew that it always sounded that way… :)

    Naturally he too barked at everyone, especially those entering without doorbell. But when they were together, clearly they were more confident (or she was protective?). I don’t think they would have attacked anyone straight ahead, but two heavily barking decent sized dogs make anyone a bit nervous. Whenever they noticed that any of our family members welcomed the visitors, they pretty much went silent / curious / even playful.

    When the younger of the dogs was a bit over year old, I had a year that I only visited home mostly at weekends. One time when I played with him, I started thinking that he seemed to challenge me a bit (not following orders like stop / no when things got a tad too rough). Naturally dogs tend to do that in that age, to see if they can get upper position in the herd. Also, I was not even there most of the time.

    So, it was time to do the staring contest. The loser turns his head away (submission). Knowing this, I pretty much had upper hand. :) But he did certainly confirm my suspicion, it took a whole 10 seconds or so (compared to clear fast victories before). And I had never again that problem anymore.

    Usually he went tail up and all bossy meeting all other dogs (even if he “lost” that position later). But once when I was out with him (he was on the leash, inside city) I noticed a dog in one yard. That dog was also on the leash (owner probably was visiting someone inside briefly). Somehow confidence radiated from that dog far away, it seemed so relaxed even while alone there. I got curious to see how my bossy friend beside me would react to him. When the two dogs noticed each other, this confident dog did not seem to care at all.

    But my friend was intently staring at his way, and finally I almost felt the other dog doing a mental “sigh” when he got up from laying down to sitting and watching back. From there, it only took seconds when our familys dogs tail dropped down and all other “Ok you win”-gestures took over. I was a bit amused, that was a rare sight from him. We were not even very close (about 5 meters away).

    This is something that “normal” dogs can do. They have ears, tails and enough face to make all sort of gestures which can tell whole worlds to other dogs. Very rarely they need to get aggressive to decide who the boss is, the most confident can really show it to others. I feel sad for all the dogs that have been taken (or reduced) one of their most natural way of communication (unnatural face, no tail, etc).

    Whoever gets a dog, should learn to at least recognize the basic gesture patterns. For example, punishing a dog that already shows submission to you is outright stupid. Dogs do notice it when you are angry to them and act accordingly (at least if your position is above the dog in dogs opinion). Heh, now I got all preachy about this… Also you need to learn to notice if your dog is challenging your position (and how they do it), if you are firm and assertive at that point (usually when he / she is a bit over year old, full-grown and ready to take on the world), you can easily be boss for the rest of the time too.

  • Yes, we are very much like a dog pack. And it has affected our way of thinking and our need to create Alpha leaders. I see the meme a lot in literature, especially fantasy tropes.

    Always, always the search for a benevolent tyrant.

    Cats are an interesting addition to the mix. But they also work in tribes with alpha animals. So perhaps that gave us a small way to bond with them. But that hasn’t stopped them from thinking that we live to serve them.

  • Penikulma—what an amazing word. I have had a wide variety of both mongrel and pure bred dogs. One thing is they are all fairly intelligent and loving. But when left alone in the house with the cats?

    Heh….mischief. The dogs redirect their Prime Directive from the humans to the cats! It is very amusing to come home and see what they did together. One thing: pull stuff out of the trash. Dogs do that then the cats will see if there is anything of interest…. :)

  • bringmethefinestwines

    Yeah…cats…we had 3 of them when I was a child up until 23 when I flew the nest.

    Something I like about cats, a kind of purity.

    On the plot down in Spain my parents have a really cute spanish dog (called Chico!) that mysteriously appeared one day at the house…really is the cutest little thing and very intelligent. At night he runs to bed, rolls on his back and waits to be tucked in…without ever being told or trained….talk about a spoilt fussmonster.

    My girlfriend Lily was a cat in a former life…a real queen, likes to be stroked, can strike quickly and is quite proper. I’m just a big softy dog in comparison :) )

  • Wind from Yekaterinburg

    June 15, 2009

    Appointment in Yekaterinburg
    The Ending of America’s Financial-Military Empire
    By MICHAEL HUDSON

    The city of Yekaterinburg, Russia’s largest east of the Urals, may become known not only as the end of the road for the tsars but of American hegemony too; as the place not only where US U-2 pilot Gary Powers was shot down in 1960, but where the US-centered international financial order was brought to ground.

    Challenging America is the prime focus of extended meetings in Yekaterinburg, Russia (formerly Sverdlovsk) today and tomorrow (June 15-16) for Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other top officials of the six-nation Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The alliance is comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrghyzstan and Uzbekistan, with observer status for Iran, India, Pakistan and Mongolia. It will be joined on Tuesday by Brazil for trade discussions among the so-called BRIC nations –Brazil, Russia, India and China.

    The attendees have assured American diplomats that it is not their aim to dismantle the financial and military empire of the United States. They simply want to discuss mutual aid – but in a way that has no role for the United States, for NATO or for the US dollar as a vehicle for trade. US diplomats may well ask what this really means, if not a move to make US hegemony obsolete. After all, that is what a multipolar world means. For starters, in 2005 the SCO asked Washington to set a timeline to withdraw from its military bases in Central Asia. Two years later the SCO countries formally aligned themselves with the former CIS republics belonging to the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), established in 2002 as a counterweight to NATO.

    Yet the Yekaterinburg meeting has elicited only a collective yawn from the US and even European press despite its agenda — nothing less than the replacement of the global dollar standard with a new financial and military defense system. A Council on Foreign Relations spokesman has said he hardly can imagine that Russia and China can overcome their geopolitical rivalry, suggesting that America can use the divide-and-conquer that Britain used so deftly for many centuries in fragmenting foreign opposition to its own empire. But George W. Bush (“I’m a uniter, not a divider”) built on the Clinton administration’s legacy in driving Russia, China and their neighbors to find a common ground when it comes to finding an alternative to the dollar and hence to the US ability to run balance-of-payments deficits ad infinitum.

    What may prove to be the last rites of American hegemony began already in April at the G-20 conference, and became even more explicit at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on June 5, when Mr. Medvedev called for China, Russia and India to “build an increasingly multipolar world order.” What this means in plain English is: We have reached our limit in subsidizing the United States’ military encirclement of Eurasia while also allowing the US to appropriate our exports, companies, stocks and real estate in exchange for paper money of questionable worth.

    The artificially maintained unipolar system,” Mr. Medvedev spelled out, is based on “one big center of consumption, financed by a growing deficit, and thus growing debts, one formerly strong reserve currency, and one dominant system of assessing assets and risks.” At the root of the global financial crisis, he concluded, is the fact that the United States makes too little and spends too much, particularly its vast military outlays, such as the stepped-up US military aid to Georgia announced just last week, the NATO missile shield in Eastern Europe and the US buildup in the oil-rich Middle East and Central Asia.

    The sticking point for all these countries is the ability of the United States to print unlimited amounts of dollars. Overspending by U.S. consumers on imports in excess of exports, U.S. buy-outs of foreign companies and real estate, and the dollars that the Pentagon spends abroad all end up in foreign central banks. These banks then face a hard choice: either to recycle these dollars back to the United States by purchasing US Treasury bills, or to let the “free market” force up their currency relative to the dollar – thereby pricing their exports out of world markets and hence creating domestic unemployment and business insolvency.

    When China and other countries recycle their dollar inflows by buying US Treasury bills to “invest” in the United States, this buildup is not really voluntary. It does not reflect faith in the ability of the U.S. economy to enrich foreign central banks for their savings. Nor does it represent any calculated investment preference. It is simply a matter of a lack of alternatives. U.S.-style “free markets” hook countries into a system that forces them to accept dollars without limit. Now they want out.

    This means creating a new alternative. Rather than making merely “cosmetic changes as some countries and perhaps the international financial organisations themselves might want,” said Mr. Medvedev at the end of his St. Petersburg speech, “what we need are financial institutions of a completely new type, where particular political issues and motives, and particular countries will not dominate.”

    When foreign military spending forced the US balance of payments into deficit and drove the United States off gold in 1971, central banks were left without the traditional asset used to settle payments imbalances. The alternative was to invest their subsequent inflows of US dollars in US Treasury bonds, as if these still were “as good as gold.” Central banks now hold $4 trillion of these bonds in their international reserves. These loans have financed most of the US Government’s domestic budget deficits for over three decades now! Given the fact that about half of US Government discretionary spending is for military operations – including more than 750 foreign military bases and increasingly expensive operations in the oil-producing and transporting countries – the international financial system is organized in a way that finances the Pentagonand also US buyouts of foreign assets expected to yield much more than the Treasury bonds that foreign central banks hold.

    The main political issue confronting the world’s central banks is therefore how to avoid adding yet more dollars to their reserves and thereby financing yet further US deficit spending – including military spending on their borders.

    For starters, the six SCO countries and BRIC countries intend to trade in their own currencies so as to get the benefit of mutual credit that the United States until now has monopolized for itself. Toward this end, China has struck bilateral deals with Argentina and Brazil to denominate their trade in renminbi rather than the dollar, sterling or euros, and two weeks ago China reached an agreement with Malaysia to denominate trade between the two countries in renminbi. Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad explained to me in January that as a Muslim country, Malaysia wants to avoid doing anything that would facilitate US military action against Islamic countries, including Palestine. The nation has too many dollar assets as it is, his colleagues explained. Central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan of the People’s Bank of China put an official statement on the bank’s website, explaining that the goal is now to create a reserve currency “that is disconnected from individual nations.” This is the aim of the discussions in Yekaterinburg.

    Aside from no longer financing the U.S. buyout of their own industries and the U.S. military encirclement of the globe, China, Russia and other countries would no doubt like to enjoy the same kind of free ride that America has been getting. As matters stand now, they see the United States as a lawless nation, financially as well as militarily. How else to characterize a nation that proclaims a set of laws for others – on war, debt repayment and treatment of prisoners – but flouts them itself? The United States is now the world’s largest debtor yet has avoided the pain of “structural adjustments” imposed on other debtor economies. U.S. interest-rate and tax reductions in the face of exploding trade and budget deficits are seen as the height of hypocrisy in view of the austerity programs that Washington forces on other countries via the IMF and other Washington vehicles.

    The United States tells debtor economies to sell off their public utilities and natural resources, raise their interest rates and increase taxes while gutting their social safety nets to squeeze out money to pay creditors. And at home, Congress blocked, on grounds of national security, China’s CNOOK from buying Unocal, much as it blocked Dubai from buying US ports and blocked other sovereign wealth funds from buying into key infrastructure. Foreigners are invited to emulate the Japanese purchase of white elephant trophies such as Rockefeller Center, on which investors quickly lost a billion dollars and ended up walking away.

    In this respect the US has given China and other payments-surplus nations no alternative but to find a way to avoid further dollar buildups. To date, China’s attempts to diversify its dollar holdings beyond Treasury bonds have not proved very successful. For starters, Hank Paulson of Goldman Sachs steered its central bank into higher-yielding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities, explaining that these were de facto public obligations. They collapsed in 2008, but at least the U.S. Government took over these two mortgage-lending agencies, formally adding their $5.2 trillion in obligations to the national debt. In fact, it was largely foreign official investment that prompted the bailout. Imposing a loss for foreign official agencies would have broken the Treasury-bill standard then and there, not only by utterly destroying US credibility but because there simply are too few Government bonds to absorb the dollars being flooded into the world economy by the soaring US balance-of-payments deficits.

    in late 2007, seeking more of an equity position to protect the value of their dollar holdings as the Federal Reserve’s credit bubble drove interest rates down, China’s sovereign wealth funds sought to diversify. China bought stakes in the well-connected Blackstone equity fund and Morgan Stanley on Wall Street, Barclays in Britain, South Africa’s Standard Bank (once affiliated with Chase Manhattan back in the apartheid 1960s) and in the soon-to-collapse Belgian financial conglomerate Fortis. But the US financial sector was collapsing under the weight of its debt pyramiding, and prices for shares plunged for banks and investment firms across the globe.

    Foreigners see the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organization as Washington surrogates in a financial system backed by American military bases and aircraft carriers encircling the globe. But this military domination is a vestige of an American empire no longer able to rule by economic strength. US military power is muscle-bound, based more on atomic weaponry and long-distance air strikes than on ground operations, which have become too politically unpopular to mount on any large scale.

    On the economic front there is no foreseeable way in which the United States can work off the $4 trillion it owes foreign governments, their central banks and the sovereign wealth funds set up to dispose of the global dollar glut. America has become a deadbeat –a militarily aggressive one — as it sruggles to hold onto the immense power it once earned by economic means. The problem for the rest of the world is how to constrain its behavior. Yu Yongding, a former Chinese central bank advisor now with China’s Academy of Sciences, suggested that US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner be advised that the United States should “save” first and foremost by cutting back its military budget. “U.S. tax revenue,” he said, “is not likely to increase in the short term because of low economic growth, inflexible expenditures and the cost of ‘fighting two wars.’”

    At present foreign savings are what finance the US budget deficit by buying most Treasury bonds. The consequence is taxation without representation for foreign voters as to how the US Government uses their forced savings. It therefore is necessary for the financial diplomats to broaden the scope of their policy-making beyond the private-sector marketplace. Exchange rates are determined by many factors besides “consumers wielding credit cards,” the usual euphemism that the US media cite for America’s balance-of-payments deficit. Since the 13th century, war has been a dominating factor in the balance of payments of leading nations – and of their national debts. Government bond financing consists mainly of war debts, as normal peacetime budgets tend to be balanced. This links the war budget directly to the balance of payments and exchange rates.

    Foreign nations see themselves stuck with unpayable IOUs under conditions where, if they move to stop the US free lunch, the dollar will plunge and their dollar holdings will fall in value relative to their own domestic currencies and other currencies. If China’s currency rises by 10 per cent against the dollar, its central bank will show the equivalent of a $200 million loss on its $2 trillion of dollar holdings as denominated in yuan. This explains why, when bond ratings agencies talk of the US Treasury securities losing their AAA rating, they don’t mean that the government cannot simply print the paper dollars to “make good” on these bonds. They mean that dollars will depreciate in international value. And that is just what is now occurring. When U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner assumed an earnest mien and told an audience at Peking University in early June that he believed in a “strong dollar” and China’s US investments therefore were safe and sound, he was greeted with derisive laughter.

    Anticipation of a rise in China’s exchange rate provides an incentive for speculators to seek to borrow in dollars to buy renminbi and benefit from the appreciation. For China, the problem is that this speculative inflow would become a self-fulfilling prophecy by forcing up its currency. So the problem of international reserves is inherently linked to that of capital controls. Why should China see its profitable companies sold for yet more freely-created US dollars, which the central bank must use to buy low-yielding US Treasury bills or lose yet further money on Wall Street?

    To steer round this quandary it is necessary to reverse the philosophy of open capital markets that the world has held ever since Bretton Woods in 1944. On the occasion of Mr. Geithner’s visit to China, Zhou Xiaochuan, minister of the Peoples Bank of China, the country’s central bank, said pointedly that this was the first time since the semiannual talks began in 2006 that “China needed to learn from American mistakes as well as its successes” when it came to deregulating capital markets and dismantling controls.

    So an era is winding to its end. In the face of continued US overspending, de-dollarization threatens to force countries to return to the kind of dual exchange rates common between World Wars I and II: one exchange rate for commodity trade, another for capital movements and investments, at least from dollar-area economies.

    Even without capital controls, the nations meeting at Yekaterinburg are taking steps to avoid being the unwilling recipients of yet more dollars. Seeing that U.S. global hegemony cannot continue without the spending power that they themselves supply, governments are attempting to hasten what Chalmers Johnson has called “the sorrows of empire” in his book by that name – the bankruptcy of the US financial-military world order. If China, Russia and their non-aligned allies have their way, the United States will no longer live off the savings of others in the form of its own recycled dollars, nor have the money for unlimited military expenditures and adventures.

    US officials wanted to attend the Yekaterinburg meeting as observers. They were told No. It is a word that Americans will hear much more in the future.

    Michael Hudson is a former Wall Street economist. A Distinguished Research Professor at University of Missouri, Kansas City (UMKC), he is the author of many books, including Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire (new ed., Pluto Press, 2002) He can be reached via his website, mh@michael-hudson.com

  • Japan and China fight it out for right to mine lithium under Bond’s battlefield

    ( Hope this will bring peace to ME…)

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6498591.ece

    http://news.backchina.com/2009/6/16/45169.html

    Leo Lewis, Asia Business Correspondent
    The desolate, sun-baked deserts of southwestern Bolivia are poised to become the energy battleground of the 21st century, with China and Japan staking early and aggressive claims in the great lithium land-grab.

    Japan, observers say, may have won the first round, but, with its mainstream resource ambitions thwarted on the Rio Tinto deal, China could redouble its efforts to gain a foothold in the salt flats of South America and the all-important technology metals.

    The flurry of ruthlessly competitive diplomatic and corporate overtures to Bolivia from both Tokyo and Beijing is driven by the same dream: ultimate control of the future global market for electric vehicles. An ample supply of lithium, at least using current technology, is the critical weapon in that quest and Bolivia is to lithium what Saudi Arabia is to oil, say geologists.

    Masao Kando, director-general of the metals strategy department of the Japanese Government, told The Times: “We all know that China is becoming the world’s biggest car producer and we see them as our biggest rival. Looking at the Rio Tinto case, we see that China is moving to secure resources by throwing incredibly abundant capital at the effort and it is sometimes hard to compete with that.”

    Related Links
    China cracks the electric car
    Japanese industry set for a lithium rush
    At present, Chile is the world’s biggest annual producer of lithium, but half the planet’s known reserves of the metal are thought to lie under the Salar De Uyuni in Bolivia. The right relationship with La Paz will hold the key to everything, according to senior Japanese officials.

    For the two rival Asian economic giants, control of lithium supplies – or at least a firm guarantee of stable future flows – is vital. For Japan, whose export-led economy is dominated by the lithium-hungry auto and electronics industries, it is a fight for survival of the status quo. With reliable long-term sources of lithium, Japanese companies can continue producing batteries for the world’s laptops, digital cameras and mobile phones. With the same guarantee, Japanese car companies will be able to convert their manufacturing prowess to mass production of electric vehicles.

    Yet for China the motivation for lithium dominance is even more compelling: the United States, Germany and Japan led the world in the development of petrol-driven cars in the 20th century and it would take many years for Chinese carmakers to match that expertise. Electric vehicles, on the other hand, represent a blank slate: these are pioneering days in the post-combustion engine era and a potentially huge opportunity for China to lunge for early leadership, increasingly nervous Japanese automaker executives believe.

    Japan’s latest gambit in the rush for Bolivia’s lithium resources involved a delegation of corporate and government figures, including executives from Sumitomo and Mitsubishi, and what is understood to have been a promise that Japanese mining technology would be shared with their Bolivian counterparts. While the reserves under Salar de Uyuni, where Quantum of Solace, the most recent Bond film, was shot, are thought to be vast, they are not as readily extractable as sources elsewhere. Japan’s expertise is thought to be the solution.

    China, whose lands hold about a tenth of the estimated global reserves of lithium, is the world’s third-largest producer and several of its companies have rapidly grown to become substantial global players in lithium battery production. Beijing’s efforts to butter-up the authorities in La Paz have included a donation of cash to help to build a school in the town where President Morales was born and a gift of about 50 military vehicles, including two ships.

    Have your say

    It should come as little surprise, then, that the brother of Japan’s emperor, Masahito Hitachi, arrived yesterday here in Santa Cruz de la Sierra for five days to celebrate 110 years of Japanese migration to Bolivia.

    Michael Moretti, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia

    Lithium can be recycled, oil can not, so no peak Li, also there are many new Li battery types coming, which are safe and none toxic, with high power density, The future is electric with Solar power generation. Forget hydrogen very poor energy carrier.

    Peter, Windsor, UK

    Lithium by itself is not such a big deal but combined with the rare earth metals, mostly found in China, it suddenly becomes very important. All are vital to electric cars and batteries. China is so important that GM (in a rare coherent moment) moved its entire development unit to — China.

    dhome, sydney, australia

    Reason # 667 why Globalism is the problem and not the solution. Interdependence you say? What was wrong with self-reliance? I must be a thought crimminal…

    Stephen, St.Louis,

    Diversifying away from these bottlenecks appears to be a more worthwhile endeavour. Take the superconductor industry. Although very complex ceramics work, so do far more mundane compounds.
    More research into transition metals or organometallic compounds.

    Richard, london, England

    Lithium-ion batteries are not the only option for laptops, cameras and phones.
    Silver zinc batteries are being developed that last longer, can be 95% recycled and are safer. They have a water based chemistry which means they are nonflammable.

    Tim, Northants, UK

    This is a similar commodity to rare earths with similiar and complementary applications. The main difference being that China has its own reserves of rare earths but has to compete with Japan and the rest of the world for lithium supplies. China with deeper pockets is the likely victor.

    Bobby, Hampshire,

    Will this lead to the destruction of one of the most amazing landscapes on Earth?

    Jo, London,

    So after Peak Oil, we’re going to face Peak Lithium? The collapse of globalisation is going to be a rough ride!

  • openly hidden

    this is true. i currently have 5 dogs. they just show up at different times. another dog came to live here just 3 days ago. all the creeps that live in the little town nearby drop their dogs off down my road knowing my wife will get them homes….OR I AM STUCK WITH THE ONES THAT ARE TOO UGLY FOR ANYONE ELSE TO TAKE! (i have to admit they are remarkably loyal and fine watch dogs as long as i don’t expect too much complicated from them) and all i can say about this is from now on, my mind is not going to rise above the goings on of brit.brit or lady gaga.

  • openly hidden

    and we have three of the snottiest goddamn cats living in my house. they can’t go outside or the dogs will kill them. so they regard my house as their house. and i have lots of problems with the worlds fattest, laziest cat sneaking into my bed at night when i am sleeping. gads, but i am a world class sucker!

  • openly hidden

    and these cats were saved from the dogs outside too they just show up and maybe the dogs will kill them before they get into my house and maybe not. but i seem to be responsible for them. is it any wonder i feel beat down all the time!

  • Openly hidden, now we know your problems: you are a slave to some cats who use the DOGS to keep you servicing them. :)

  • openly hidden

    here is one of the main reasons why there will not be a hot revolution in america….imho….seriously….cause what does all this mean really? think about it. heh. hint. zbigniew brzezinski’s momma didn’t raise any dummy. ===========================
    from http://www.tmz.com/

    “Something must have really, really been lost in translation here — cause after a question about her upcoming fight, female Brazilian MMA fighter Cris “Cyborg” Santos suddenly threw this reporter into one of the most devastating headlocks you’ve ever seen….”

    Dude eventually woke up … but he didn’t remember a damn thing.

  • Elaine,

    You THINK too much. After the so-called “eons of evolution” give a man a steak, a beer, and an attractive woman and nothing else matters. You need not delve into such deep subtleties of the human mind. Oh, sorry, you were talking about dogs.

    Dogs are loyal. Cats are useless fur producers. At least minks are useful for something.

  • you can train em’ you can help em’ and you can eat em’ if all else fails
    .
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7gqts_immortal-tyrants-graspop-2008_music
    .
    dont eat the human we need more bRAiNz

  • Off topic,
    recession, i don’t see no stink’n recession, here in BC, a fellow i met over the weekend reports that his friend had 9 offers on his house for sale, 4 were good and he got 50K over ask. looks like a new farmers market going up nearby and a new winery opening down the road. Apparently the ever optimistic real estate board has reason to be upbeat. The official line is that we are floating on infrastructure spending and the olympics goody good times.
    We had a real estate bubble here also but there is a lot of money coming from China for that and we weren’t quite as insane as the US because of different banking rules.

  • from one of Denningers enthusiasts [sieg heil!]

    ”That’s it: we’re ****ed.

    The faster WW III starts, the better. ”

  • http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-40360220090616
    Tehran has been gripped by the biggest anti-government protests since the 1979 Islamic revolution after disputed official results showed Ahmadinejad scored a landslide in Friday’s election.
    .
    like mass protests in the streets dont make this guy seem like a distant megolamaniac half a world away. If the supreme leader was in trouble he wouldnt but sacrifice his life. but the state of the republic ah… must have enough goons to take care of the other 33% LoL what a image of Irans deep white knuckle divide

  • Iran president visits Russia despite protests
    Translation: It\’s no big deal

  • My impression is that dogs with jobs seem to be more well-adjusted than are the idle decorative show pieces. Dogs with jobs need to be capable of actually doing the job, which means that they have to have a functional build. Different jobs require different builds, of course, and thus different dogs and different dog breeds. Many of the classic dog breeds were in fact developed to provide a specific build for a specific working purpose. Most of such breeds are not freaks, and were pretty much very healthy dogs. There was some trouble with hip dysplasia bred into a few of the breeds like German Shepherds/Alsatians, and Dalmatians tend to deafness, but those are very much the exceptions.

    If I had my way, the only dog shows that would ever happen would be ones where dogs with jobs were put through their paces. One does see this with Border Collies herding sheep; the same sort of thing should apply for all other working breeds.

    By the way, something almost as cruel as inbreeding dogs to display extreme distortions in their natural form is keeping a working breed and not giving it appropriate work to do. I once knew someone who acquired an Alaska Huskie, and built a very small cage to keep it in all day while they were both at work. The poor thing proceeded to tear its dog house to shreds, it was so frustrated with all that pent-up energy. That breed was developed to run miles and miles each day! If you can’t put a working breed to work, then IMHO you really don’t have any business owning that working breed.

  • We had a sled dog, Duke. He pulled sleds. When we or our son would come out with the sled harness and held it in the air, he would jump up and down with joy. He loved pulling sleds and would tear off, full speed, if he could. A happy dog until he had joint problems in old age. He hated slowing down.

    But breeding is killing even sled dogs when they are sold as pets. People buy dogs and then inbreed them because they can do this, no one will stop them. So all dogs, without exception, if they are ‘breed specific’ have had many defects bred into them via too much inbreeding by individual breeders.

  • “The dogs, on the other hand, were useful pets. This discovery was probably accidental.”

    There’s a theory that some wolves recognized a good thing when they saw it: they could live off humans more easily than they could in the wild. Humans, who always like being adored by something, were fine with that.

    So the dumb, lazy, unambitious wolves became dogs, while the smart, tough, entrepeneurial sort of wolves stayed wolves.

  • We have two dogs. I love them both.

    Just this week while I was on vacation, somebody showed up on the porch – through the screen door mind ya. Our dog Chester got right up to his kneecap. He let it be know in no uncertain terms that he would strike at a moments notice with one “false move”.

    Like I said. I love my dogs.

    Peace,
    Ken

    ps – glad to back from vacation to read this awesome material. Brilliant.

  • While I was on vacation, I read two book —- well, I speed read the 2nd half of the 2nd one.

    Anyhow, here they are if you care:

    * Indian Givers, by Jack Weatherford; &

    * A Century of War, by William Engdahl (Elaine and others, there were some things in this book that I think merit further discussion – just an opinion)

    The first book above was most informative.

    Peace,
    ken

  • So just to keep the talk going here…..

    I have speculated elsewhere in an erstwhile fashion (if you know what I mean)….

    That.

    Flea-markets are going to be the business of the future.

    One-time I had dream about a bunch of circular fleas on my scalp, but an interpreter helped me understand what it all meant.

    Unless that is of course, unless, well. Unless.

    Choice is sacred but Israel is NOT.

    It ain’t even sacrosanct.

    Who said that in the first place.

    What a joke. A bad one.

    Almost like a poke in the eye if you know what I mean…..

  • I have two dogs.

    Chester Roy Feffef and

    Abby My-a.

    I love them both!

    BIG-TIME.

  • For the hell of it, cause I have nothing better to do just now.

    I also think.

    Shit-Zu is a great name for a dog!

    Are we a pack or a herd or maybe something only to be figured out in the future. I choose the latter.

    Choice is sacred.

  • Oh yeah – “James-wise”.

    The first day of Summer in the Northern Hemisphere is tomorrow.

    Just so happens also happens to be Father’s Day.

    Coincidence?

    You tell me.

  • There is this neighborhood nearby where I live.

    Named Sumner something.

    It was based on leverage.

    Just now there ain’t nothing there.

    Just an open field and a cracked wall.

    Simple.

    Obvious.

    Some things are obviously simple.

  • Incidently, since I’m talking to myself (wonder if dogs do that?), leverage can only go so far. After awhile it gets overextended and then big Mamma comes into town for the purpose of some balancing.

    Wonder if our brain is big enough to understand something bout balance.

    No matter.

    The pendulum swings back.

    Big time……

    tic-toc and such.

    Know what I mean?

    8 is a fine number in my opinion.

    But of course, maybe my auspiciousness is biased. Probably is. What bout U?

  • So I shouldn’t tell this but I will.

    Once I was in my front yard (not just in my mind) and two big huge dogs (wolfs?) came by for a visit. They were just lapping it up. Having a grand time. I felt honored that they came by.

    One of the dogs, let me touch their fur. Again, I felt honored. The other dog just checked out the area — for a little while.

    Later on, I saw them up the road just playing with each other. They were amazing to me and I remember. I always will remember that.

    Timeless it seemed.

    Peace, Good Night, and Happy Solstice.

    We need some good transition.

  • Some good railroads (modern ones) is also a good idea.

    I’m glad GM went bankrupt because GM deserved it.

    The banks deserve likewise cause they have no equity as far as I’m concerned. But that is just me. My perception.

    Please though. Stay out of my yard. After the dogs showed up in my mind everything changed. Changed for the better if you want my opinon for what it is worth.

    Dime a dozen.

  • Thanks for the link, Tio. Zero Hedge Fund has really bad analysis there. He doesn’t tie in a zillion things like the significant fact that China is the world’s biggest CREDITOR nation.

    The inability to see all aspects of something is understandable. One reads the news and then jumps to conclusions which is why I spend so much time doing graphs, charts and tracking central banks, world trade, etc.

    China, like ALL nations on earth, has just had a credit bubble (thanks to US wild overspending) but China also has tons of sovereign wealth which the US does not have. We have lots of IOUs we must eventually pay back or go bankrupt and die. A very significant difference.

    Everything is relative: when everyone is falling into the same hole, the ones who fall on top are the winners. China will fall on top of the US, not the other way around.

  • China is vulnerable just like we all are.

    China might have the upper hand, but that does not assure “victory” – whatever the hell that is.

    Peace,
    Ken

  • Hi Elaine,

    thank you for being so kind as to have a look at that article, I don’t doubt for one moment that you are quite correct in your overall assessment of the likely outcome of the new great game in the medium to long term, all things being equal so to speak. Also I quite agree that this is an poor overall analysis (especially for ZH) but it is an analysis that ‘appears’ to highlight some of internals of the House of Han that I was unaware of. We had a programme on TV the other night which more closely resembled a psy-op of Dengs struggle with the party over the open door policy. One quote attributed to Deng, so as to assure his apparatchiks, was that if “you open a window you are bound to let a few flies in”, and that “these would be dealt with later”, who knew? *ha* There are sadly few articles that discuss the current financial dynamics within China itself (that I am aware of) and find anything that gives me this sense of ‘relativism’ welcome. Your final comment is what I was after, I think. Thank you once again.

  • You are welcome, Tio. We have to always remember, all things are relative to each other. So if the US falls off a cliff and then, all our creditors in Asia do likewise, this does not mean that when things improve, we will be on top. It means, we will end up on the bottom.

    Remember: once, about 400 years ago, Spain ruled the Seven Seas and controlled a tremendous amount of the planet earth. Then, by 300 years ago, was weak and deep in debt and 200 years ago, ceased to be a world power at all.

  • Spain deserved what Spain got.

    They were way too ruthless.

    Sick. Head cutting off blood-thirsty women babies and men killing machines.

    Spain deserves what Spain got.

    History don’t lie.

  • I read a book awhile ago about a fella who lived amongst the indigineous Indonesians (I hope I have that correct).

    Anyhow, what he said is that in the morning they all voluntarily discussed their dreams.

    In informed the rest of the day and to the initial surprise of the author it was most accurate.

    Imagine that!

  • Just a minor clarification. It was Malaysia.

    The book is: “Original Wisdom”.

    By Robert Wolff!

    :smile:

    The book probably isn’t for everyone, but tell me this, what book is?

    Peace,
    Ken


Leave a Reply