IMF Chief Blew Off Paying For Blow Job

 

 

The mystery of the maid and the IMF idiot continues to swirl down the toilet and as I figured but couldn’t prove, this was a blow job whereby the John thought, there being no pimp involved, he could cheat the poor maid out of her pay.  Typical, actually.  Prostitutes who are professionals have ways of dealing with this whereas this maid was sort of making things up as it went along.  They struggled over the money, she fled then he fled and then both proceeded to lie about everything under the sheets.  Put both in jail.  For wasting taxpayer money and endangering others.

 

 

Here is the latest details and it sounds probably correct:  Sources: Maid targeted Dominique Strauss-Kahn for his money – NYPOST.com

 

Multiple versions have emerged of what happened next, but nobody disputes that the 32-year-old maid performed oral sex on the Frenchman known as “the Great Seducer.”

Sources now tell The Post that when the two were finished, the woman demanded cash from Strauss-Kahn — but he refused to pay…”She remained in the room with him while he got dressed for at least nine minutes,” the source said.  The woman’s lawyer has charged that DSK angrily grabbed her breast and vagina, leaving her with bruises to the groin area.

The fight also apparently prompted DSK to bolt the Sofitel in such a hurry that he left behind a cellphone.

 

He isn’t a ‘seducer’, he is a schmucker (joke here).  There must be this ‘to do’ list for all men who think with the little head downstairs.  If you are running for political office, you should:

 

1.  Have sex with your housekeeper and get her pregnant.
2.  Have sex with your campaign aide and get her pregnant.
3.  Have a blow job in the Oval Office.
4.  Have sex with a maid expecting a ‘tip’ and then stiff her.
5.  Have virtual sex online with college girls by sending them nude photos.

 

I am baffled as to why these males can’t learn how to self-administer relief.  If their wives refuse to have sex (and in many of these cases, the wives are very definitely providing sex!) why can’t these guys jerk off?  Why do they always have to involve employees, strangers and maids?  Maids, in particular, go way back in time as exploitable for sex.  The worse thing these stupid males then do is lie about this illicit sex, cover it up, pay off the  maids or try to defame them.

 

The females in these situations are mercenaries.  They want the guys to have illicit sex.  Then, either they get happy money like from Arnold Schwarzenegger whose wife, Maria Shriver, files for divorce or the husband, like John Edwards To Marry Mistress Weeks After Wife’s Death—runs off to play while the mother of his several children is sick with cancer (a big ‘heartless creep’ award for that guy!).  In the bourgeoise world of modern politics outside of Saudi Arabia (many wives and mistresses are legal in that ‘puritanical’ pleasure state!) one has to not run around London at night, having sex with every prostitute on every street corner while hammering the staff and any stray females that wander into one’s vicinity.

 

A certain amount of self-control has to be adhered to just as women can’t run around all night, jumping teenage boys in back alleys, yeowling like cougars in heat.  I used to live in the desert and when a cougar female wanted sex, she would ROAR quite loudly.  Sometimes, I would be at the bus stop before dawn (picked up at 5:00 am, believe it or not) and this would startle me when it was rather close by.

 

Anyways, back to the IMF and cheating third world prostitutes: that figures!  It must be part of the job interview.  ’So, how many maids have you cheated after getting a blow job?’ as the candidate smirks and says, ‘I do this nearly every time I am in a top scale hotel!’  High fives all around, no?  This sort of thing goes along with the next IMF job interview question, ‘Do you believe in stealing candy from babies?’ and ‘If you were Scrooge, would you kick over Tiny Tim’s crutch and then tell him, he has to make sacrifices to pay off the British National Debt?’

 

Now, after reading about the above crime story, we go onto another Upper East Side crime story that has an interesting twist since it reveals the truth of many ‘charities’ which are really scam operations to avoid taxes:  Son stabs mother in their Upper East Side apartment – NYPOST.com

Sources said the son, who is unemployed and mentally unstable, then grabbed a knife from the kitchen and repeatedly stabbed the mom, 67, who heads the non-profit Weiden Schwartz Fischler Family Foundation.

 

Out of idle curiosity, I looked up this ‘foundation’ and discovered a scam operation.  Seems mommy was ‘employed’ in doing nothing at all except sit at home and avoid taxes:

 

WEIDEN SCHWARTZ FISCHLER FAMILY FOUNDATION – NEW YORK, NY 10028 – 45 E 85TH ST APT 7A – NonProfit/Tax Exempt Organization

So, this is an organization with no assets, no income, no output, it has no goals, no nothing.  It is private and has one employee: mommy dearest.  It is ‘non-operating’.  There are six other Schwartz families with this same ’0  0  0  0′ fund statistics:  schwartz family: Search results – www.implu.com

Looking at this long black list of ‘charities’ it is obvious that many are not really charities at all but tax scams. If one wishes to be charitable, one can give to many operational, real charities that actually do something.  If you read these ‘charities’ carefully, nearly all of them are general in nature, not set up to do anything constructive at all.

 

Here is another listing of this $0 charity:  WEIDEN SCHWARTZ FISCHLER FAMILY FOUNDATION – , DE (USA)

Set up in Delaware which was turned into a tax haven scam some years ago.  Like any British island colony, Delaware runs things so it can enable tax evasion.  Here is a different Schwartz family operation that is nearly identical, instead of Manhattan’s rich Upper East Side, this is in a very rich community (I once lived next door to this place) in Livingston, NJ:

 

NCCS Organization Profile – Howard and Betty Schwartz Family Foundation Inc (223693287)

The ‘no programs’ and ‘no user submitted programs’ is a sign this is a tax haven, not a charity.  People give money to all sorts of things and take regular tax deductions for this but the very rich can’t be happy with this since the tax deductions are capped so they found this neat trick whereby one can be the president of a charitable foundation and then suck up nearly all the money as one’s pay.  So idle family members, most often, wives, are turned into heads of a ‘business’.

Charity operations are often tax evasion schemes which is why they all love huge natural disaster events.  These open up wallets to contributions which then go into paying the wages and housing in fancy hotels for the people running these ‘charities’.  The Haiti earthquake was a huge rip off opportunity and the mega-operation of all time was anything to do with 9/11.  Here is one story:  Olympic scheme an ice-capade to scam the system.

The staff and ice skaters sucked down every penny!  No one donated their time.  They were all paid.  Normally, and I have done this, when you set up a charity event, the people in it donate their time and efforts.  They do not get paid.  So where did this business of paying people to do charity performances come in?

Well, through the back door.  They would stay in the most expensive hotels and eat in expensive restaurants and travel, etc, first class.  This would then soak up all the money generated.  Many politicians like Palin suck up ‘donations’ by charging fees for appearing at this or that.  This is how she scammed to rip off all the Tea Party people.

Skimming charity events for self-enrichment is souring people on donating during emergencies:  Britons deterred from international aid by fear of how donations are spent 

 

The majority of Britons said that they were deterred from donating because they were unsure of how their money would be spent by the charities they gave to. A third said they would be inclined to give more if they had a personal connection to the foreign event or disaster, and 20 per cent said they would be motivated to donate if they had visited a country which was the beneficiary of a humanitarian fundraising campaign.

 

The fact remains, the main beneficiaries of nearly any charity is the people running it.  I used to belong to various charitable organizations and I dumped all of them over the years due to my only interface with them ended up being them demanding money from me.  With little results.

Email:

emeinel@fairpoint.net

MAILING ADDRESS:

EMS NEWS

P.O. BOX 483

BERLIN, NY 12022

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.