The reverberations of the Chinese revelations from earlier this week continues.  The single stab at the heart of the Nixon Fiat Money Regime caused the dollar to suddenly collapse.  This was quickly corrected by having all the major G7 players step onstage to devoutly bow to the Fiat Dollar and proclaim in a chorus, it will never die.  But this one little test of the systems showed the Communist Chinese the true weakness of the dollar and how the Dragon holds the dollar in the firm grip of its claws.  So, let’s revisit the speech that caused global fear in the G7 nations:


The People’s Bank of China–News

Reform International Financial Regulatory Framework:A Few Remarks


Research Institute of Finance & Banking

People’s Bank of China


In the midst of the current financial crisis, the needs for major reform of the global financial system and global financial stability framework have been increasingly recognized.

The US and its many players in the FX games all concede that something went terribly wrong.  But of course, despite knowing exactly what went wrong, the temptation to keep on ‘sinning’ is very great.  Thus, the refusal to really fix things properly.

Policy makers and international organizations have made substantial efforts to improve the international financial system including financial regulation and supervision. Various proposals have come forward on priority areas such as redefining the scope and boundaries of financial regulation and supervision, tackling issues of pro-cyclicality in the system, retooling capital and provisioning requirements as well as refining valuation and accounting rules, and some consensus has been reached. Among others, the Group of Thirty has published a Financial Reform report, and FSF and BCBS have undertaken some work on various aspects of financial regulation and Basel II framework.


Here is a piece I wrote about the Group of 30 on May 26, 2008:

Money Matters: Group of 30: the Conclave of Financial ‘Geniuses’ Meet

  • The Group of Thirty who are the banking experts of the planet, are meeting this week in Jerusalem. As they overlook the Gaza Ghetto, they sit around the table and discuss the total collapse of the global banking system. I am guessing that they might be wondering if they did something wrong these last 40 years. Naw. They think they know everything which means they understand nothing. Or perhaps they are too close to the problem and thus, cannot see any solution. Since they don’t discuss the rise and fall of empires, they won’t see the real problems. But then, one of these 30 guys is the guy who runs the Bank of China and I assure everyone, he knows exactly what the meaning of the history of the rise and fall of empires entails. But the Western members won’t ask him about THAT! I went to the Group of 30’s library. Teased out a PDF from 1981. Lo and behold, the problems we have today were the problems we had back then! Except for one major difference: the US was not $10 trillion in public debt nor $44 trillion in collective debt and the Derivatives Beast was a tiny cute little baby. Who was being raised to protect the banks, not the $575 trillion monster it has become today.

Here is another past article of mine that has the list of Group of 30 members.  

ARREST THE GROUP OF 30 « Culture of Life News


  • Jacob A. Frenkel–Chairman, Group of Thirty, Vice-Chairman, American International Group, Former Governor, Bank of Israel

Um, the Group of 30’s Vice-chairman is the gnome who set up the present incarnation of AIG!  Good grief.  Incidentally, there are no Chinese in the Group of 30.  JP Morgan is there, though.  Lots of pirates and gnomes, in fact.

A number of regulators and the financial industry have initiated a centralized clearing and central counter-party mechanisms for OTC derivatives including credit default swaps (CDS). All these efforts will help to fend current crisis and future risks. However, we also note that several issues with respect to the financial regulatory framework have not received adequate attentions. In this note, we would like to explore these issues and provide relevant suggestions.


1.  Problems of financial regulation exposed by the financial crisis

The current financial crisis originated from the U.S. subprime crisis, and rapidly spread onto the rest of the world through financial products, financial institutions and markets. The rampant spread of the current crisis demonstrates that issues in the philosophy, effectiveness and international cooperation of financial regulation need to be resolved as effective regulation and supervision is the most powerful external force for containing financial sector risks.


Note the Chinese mention ‘philosophy.’  I consider this the most important thing that has to change, by the way.


(1)Regulatory philosophy over-confident in self-restraint of market players

In terms of financial regulation philosophy, some developed countries have been heavily reliant on self-regulation of the marketplace, believing in “minimal regulation is the best regulation”. In fact, the financial institutions implicated in the Enron and WorldCom debacles and the liquidity crisis troubling some financial institutions in the early stage of the current crisis should have impelled regulators to upgrade supervisions. However, authorities have failed to take much-needed systematic actions. One of the most important reasons for this omission is the conviction that market can correct itself, which led to the overlook of financial sector vulnerabilities posed by the profit-seeking nature of financial institutions. The evolution of the crisis demonstrated that due to the profit-driven nature of market players, market forces, if unchecked, will lead to asset bubbles and ultimately a disastrous market clearing in the form of a financial crisis like the current one, hence wreaking great havoc to global finance and world economy.


True, all markets correct themselves.  Sometimes, with extreme speed and violence.  The entire philosophy of the central banking system is to AVOID this like the plague.  Instead, we slammed right into yet another massive explosion of excess debt.


Anyone reading the history of finance can quickly see that if things are not regulated by a strong group or imperial power, things blow up due to everyone creating too much debt based on too little reserves.  This is why our Treasury was supposed to supervise the banks and prevent them from over lending.  But now, we demand the right to borrow to infinity.


(2)Regulatory system need to upgrade timely to avoid lagging behind financial innovations

The developments of the financial crisis have proven that financial innovations have created new sources of systemic risks, such as OTC products and near-bank entities including investment banks, hedge funds and special purpose vehicles (SPVs). These entities, saddled with internal problems and intertwined with traditional financial institutions, are prone to trigger systemic risks. In addition, most financial conglomerates were engaged in non-conventional financial products and businesses to circumvent regulations, which created another source of systemic risks.


The businesses which created ‘non-conventional vehicles’ tend to be headquartered on pirate islands of various sizes and locations.  Their entire existence is to circumvent regulations and evade taxes while using the vast resources of various nations to enrich themselves at everyone’s expense.


The current crisis has clearly shown that the prevailing model of financial regulation lagged behind financial innovation activities. Under the current regulatory model, only deposit-taking financial institutions and conventional financial products with obvious externalities are regulated, while near-bank entities and OTC products are subject to little, if any, supervision. Moreover, financial institutions of different types or domiciled in different jurisdictions, and different products are subject to different regulatory rules and systems. Moreover, the lack of coordination among regulatory authorities has also fostered regulatory arbitrage possibilities. As a result, financial institutions are able to circumvent rigorous regulations and maximize abnormal returns. Different types of arbitrage have hastened the rapid development of near-bank entities and OTC products, and let hedge funds enjoy the treatments from offshore financial centers.


Each word of the above paragraph should be engraved on gold and sent to all the heads of all the central banks.  Then, we can get moving and decide to raid the many pirate islands and take them over as ‘hostile territory’ and stop this crazy business of letting international corporations and LLPs use these places as pretend domiciles.  Or we can evict these guys from our own country and exile them to these tiny islands.


Note the ‘arbitrage possibilities’: this is where the money lies.  In nooks and crannies, in small corners, in glitches and mistakes.  Where there is no one looking closely, this is where money can be made via various scams and tricks.  Wizards love these.


The swift development of financial market and real economy over the last decade had led policymakers in some major economies believe that the existing regulatory structure was effective. Few measures were taken to enhance the regulatory framework to keep pace with the emergence of new products, new institutions and new markets. Since the breakout of the crisis, cases have proved that due to the lack of coordination among regulatory agencies and communications between regulators and central banks and finance ministries in some advanced countries, efforts to rescue financial institutions and stabilizing markets were hampered.


(3)Effective international regulatory cooperation yet to be in place

Due to the lack of consistent regulatory standards and a platform for effective information exchange, regulators do not have a good understanding of the cross-border activities of internationally active financial institutions. In particular, there is a lack of understanding of international capital flows.


This is a very important sentence: I agree with the Chinese in this matter.  The US has a rather infantile view of how fiat money works.  They think, they have trapped the Chinese by passing off to China, immense sums of money which are being churned out by the Bank of Japan until last year.  


China accepted this flood of money and parked it in a safe place. Now, they are using it properly: as international political leverage.  We refuse to understand that China, not the US, now controls international finance.  We can promise money to all and then some, but we can’t deliver without Chinese permission.  If we do, this will weaken the dollar, rapidly, unless the Chinese bail us out.


This means, China can strangle us very easily by refusing to bail us out.  Already, the Chinese are now encouraging the use of Chinese money for international trade.  This is part of the historic move away from the US fiat dollar and towards a Chinese fiat trade currency regime…which I suspect, will be gold-based.

Relevant international organizations were pre-occupied with macroeconomic surveillance, especially with respect to the exchange rate regimes of emerging economies.


This is certainly true.  It is moronic, of course.  The US wheelers and dealers like the AIG guy in the Group of 30 are always looking for splinters in other’s eyes while ignoring whole forests of splinters in their own eyes.

Its work on monitoring international capital flows is insufficient. So far, we still do not have a good understanding of the channels and mechanisms of cross-border fund flows, especially flows to and from the emerging market economies, and how these flows reverse in unfavorable times.


Notice that the Chinese admit that much of these things are ultimately mysterious.  The unstable floating fiat currency system is, by its very nature, extremely slippery and and change in shape and size, very rapidly, the more complex things are, the more difficult it is to control.


To enhance international cooperation in financial regulation, the Financial Stability Forum has identified 30 large internationally active financial institutions for which supervisory colleges have been established. In due course, we should assess how effective and sufficient these colleges are in strengthening international supervision of cross-border financial institutions. And IMF should also include regulation and surveillance of international capital flows as an important part of its early warning system.


2.Issues meriting special attentions in reforming the financial regulatory system

(1)Reform begins with self-criticism

One ancient Chinese philosopher once said, “(w)e should self-examine ourselves three times daily.” This epitomizes the oriental philosophy on the importance of self-criticism in improving oneself. In analyzing the root causes of and drawing lessons from the current crisis, such spirit is sorely needed. Only by looking inward with this spirit, can we draw the right lessons and avoid being blindsided. Only with the right lessons learned, can far-reaching reforms begin. Recently, there have been some blaming games, which intend to hold others responsible for the on-going difficulties. Such lack of remorse does not help in examining the flaws in the existing financial regulatory system.


HAHAHA.  Seriously, the US and its G7 pals tried over and over again, to blame China.  When Japan had an immense FOREX heap of dollars, no one said a peep.  When China’s pile grew as large as Japan’s mountain of dollars, the hollering was deafening!  When China’s pile grew to double of Japan’s pile, bitter talk about how this was stupid or wasteful took over.


Then, they accused China of a ‘savings glut’ while still not mentioning Japan’s huge ‘savings glut’.  This went on and on until the whole business fell apart.  Now, China wishes to have us reconsider all this.

In fact, lack of remorse is one key factor leading to the current crisis. Before the crisis, there was a prevalent complacency. Although the US regulatory structure was a complex patchwork of fragmented agencies and jurisdictions, some believed that it worked quite well. Though some made efforts to address issues, most are reluctant to take a serious crack at the problems with an excuse of “(i)f it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” The cost of waiting for the system to break has turned out to be tremendous. Against this backdrop, we should begin with an attitude of self-criticism while addressing the challenges of financial regulatory reform.  


Here, the Dragon slaps us silly.  And we deserved every slap.  I detect not the slightest bit of ‘remorse’ here in America.  Instead, it seems more along the lines of snarling and snapping and then huffing and puffing while trying hard as possible to get rich despite the mess.   


(2)Introduce counter-cyclical multipliers to strengthen counter-cyclical mechanism

Effectively addressing the pro-cyclicality elements in the existing capital requirement framework and improving quality of capital is essential for preventing serious financial crisis. The ongoing crisis has exposed vulnerabilities in capital adequacy requirements of banks in the following areas: (a) the Basel II framework does not adequate capture risks of complex credit products; (b) the minimum capital requirement and the quality of capital have not provided adequate buffer during the crisis; (c) the pro-cyclicality of capital adequacy has amplified volatilities; (d) there exists the differences in capital requirements among different types of financial institutions.


The Chinese communists have captured a tremendous amount of capital.  I remember when China raised the reserve ratios, for example.  Here is my February 21, 2008 article about all this:  

Money Matters: Reserve Ratios and K2 Kollapses

Dresdner Bank of Germany’s fabulous K2 fund turns into a mongrel K9 as it loses 50% of its $31 billions. And we discuss reserve ratios yet again as the Fed claims we need no reserves at all and that inflation doesn’t matter even though it is taking off like a rocket. Are we stupid or what? And all commodities continue their relentless climb while people begin to wonder if Goldman Sachs and the other hell hounds conspired to destroy the muni bond market so they could make money. Well, duh. Arrest them all.


We see from this graph that if we allow 10% ratios, money creation is much greater, many times greater over time than if we have even a 20% ratio!  The US allowed the biggest investment houses to create loans on a 3% or less ratio which meant, it was basically infinity.  China, on the other hand, raised theirs to almost 20% to kill wild speculation.

  • There have been only a handful of policy-related reserve requirement changes since the MCA was passed in 1980. In March 1983, the Fed eliminated the reserve requirement on nonpersonal time deposits with maturities of 30 months or more, and in September 1983, it reduced that minimum maturity to 18 months. Then, in December 1990, the Fed cut the requirement on nonpersonal time deposits and on net Eurocurrency liabilities from 3% to 0%. In April 1992, it cut the requirement on transaction deposits from 12% to 10%. In announcing its December 1990 move, the Fed noted that the cut would reduce banks’ costs, “providing added incentive to lend to creditworthy borrowers.” Similarly, in announcing its April 1992 cut in reserve requirements, the Fed observed that the reduction would put banks “in a better position to extend credit.” Current reserve requirements are low by historical standards. From 1937 to 1958, for example, the rate on demand deposits was always at least 20% for banks in New York and Chicago, which were “central reserve cities”—a term now obsolete.


Currently, efforts are being made in some countries and by some international organizations to expand the coverage of capital requirements, including setting requirements on asset-backed securities, off-balance sheet risk exposures and trading account activities, improving the quality of tier 1 asset, and enhancing the global consistency of minimum capital requirements. In addition, as a complement to capital adequacy ratio requirement, a properly constructed leverage ratio indicator will play a role in the macro prudential regulation framework as the new indicator can both measure potential excessive risk-taking and dampen the cyclical fluctuations.


In addressing the vulnerability of the exist capital adequacy ratio framework, particularly the cyclicality of capital buffer, authorities responsible for the overall financial stability need to develop counter-cyclical multipliers in an effort to contain pro-cyclical elements. If an economy experiences an unusual change or economic system needs an unusual counter-cyclical adjustment and specific stabilization measures, the authorities may consider issuing quarterly indexes of prosperity and stability. These indexes may then be used by financial institutions and supervisors to multiply into risk weights in calculating capital adequacy ratio. In this way, the risk weighted capital adequacy requirement and other criteria, like IRB, can better reflect counter-cyclicality requirements for financial stability.


This sounds eminently practical to me.  I support it.  I want this to happen.  I will cheerfully read these reports and studies.  For example, Bernanke’s first move was to kill the M3 data information stream.  He lied about all this and claimed, no one was interested in this information.  When we all yelled for it to return, he simply ignored us.


Specifically, with a set of prosperity indices in place, counter-cyclical multipliers can be derived. Many existing indicators linking to business cycles, investor and consumer sentiments can serve as a base for such prosperity indexes. During the boom period, asset prices increase, market exuberance prevails, and prosperity indexes are high; and vice versa during economic downturn. In deriving counter-cyclical multipliers from prosperity indexes, we should take into consideration of factors such as product type, industry and country of risk exposures. Then, the multipliers can be applied to contain the pro-cyclical factors including risk-weights, default probabilities for credit rating purposes and discount (haircut) percentages for various collaterals used in financial transactions, as well as other pro-cyclical factors. This will not only help to mitigate the pro-cyclicality elements, but also improve quality of capital by improving management of collaterals and by using multipliers-adjusted default probabilities to manage risks in complex credit products.


In other words, China wants us to be FORCED into ceasing our bubble machine.  When China detects our system running ‘hot’, they can demand our central bank raise interest rates and reserve ratios.  And increase its own ratios.  And incidentally, balance our budget.  Heh.  Someone has to force this to happen.


(3)Reulatory agencies should be adequately staffed with people with market experiences

Some regulatory agencies do not have enough professionals with practioners’ experience and hence are lack of sufficient understanding of the market developments, especially the systemic impacts of financial innovations. As a result, some supervisors turned a blind eye and were not sensitive to problems in structured products such as CDOs and derivatives such as CDS, and the shadow banking system reflected in the off-balance activities, including the critical rating methodologies for structured products. To enhance capacity, regulatory agencies should conduct systematic and frequent staff exchanges with the industry, which will enable regulatory agencies to become attentive to and keep abreast of developments of the industry and do a better job in supervisory oversight.


(4)Strengthen supervision on the use of crediting rating services and on rating agencies

Credit ratings from the major rating agencies have become international financial services products. In many countries, various rules have required investment management decisions and risk management practices to be benchmarked on financial instruments attaining certain ratings by major credit rating agencies. Once these ratings were given, the financial institutions do not need to worry about the inherent risks of the products. However, the ratings are no more than indicators of default probabilities based on historic data, which never meant to be guarantees for the future. The business model of issuer-paying for services has rendered the rating process with conflicts of interest and the major rating agencies irresponsibly gave many structured products high ratings before the crisis. During the crisis, the reversal of market conditions have forced the rating agencies to lower the ratings of many financial products, which led to massive asset markdowns and exacerbated the severity of the crisis.


The entire rating system is a total scandal.  By privatizing it so the people being rated paid for the wages of the rating companies, we got false ratings, of course.  This has to end.  It has to be done by a SEC-style organization.


Our view is that the financial institutions should conduct independent examination of risks, not simply delegate the duty to the rating agencies. To the extent external ratings are needed, internal and independent judgment has to be deployed as a complement. Regulators should encourage financial institutions to enhance internal rating capability to reduce their reliance on external ratings. Moreover, central banks and regulators should limit the use of external ratings within 50 percent of business volume, at least for those systemically important financial institutions. Meanwhile, these institutions should upgrade their internal rating capabilities to exercise independent judgment on credit risks.


See?  China agrees with me!  Imagine that!  🙂


The current crisis has also shown that national regulation of rating agencies is insufficient, and concerted international cooperation is required to tackle the problem of international regulation of credit rating activities. It makes sense for the International Organizations of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and Financial Stability Forum (FSF) to coordinate in setting standards and in enforcing them. An entity should be designated to take regular responsibilities in implementing the rules. The focus should aim to identify problems in the rating industry, to identify the conflicts of interest between the raters and the issuers and to improve the independence, fairness and transparency of rating activities. Such a body should review the track record of the major rating agencies on a periodic basis and assess the default and loss statistics of different ratings. In particular, reviews should also be made in the area of sovereign ratings of emerging economies. Results of such regular reviews should be made public so that market participants can form their own opinions and make better use of the credit ratings. In cases severe problems are identified, the designated implementing entity should take remedial actions including, among others, imposing corrective actions on the problem agencies, publicizing problem areas, private censures and public reprimands. Based on the findings of the entity, national regulators can also impose punitive measures including banning from the industry on the problem agencies.


Hedge funds vow to fight as G20 gathers – Telegraph


A group of powerful hedge fund managers has warned that they are ready to quit London and move off-shore if regulations or taxes become too onerous.

Last night global leaders also vowed to show unity as they try to rebuild the shattered financial system. The White House insisted there was no “gulf” between the US and Europe on how to avoid global financial meltdown.

There are fears that Germany and France will deeply oppose US plans to increase fiscal stimulus while doing little to improve regulation.

Denis McDonough, the US deputy national security adviser, said the desire for global co-operation has not been as strong for the last 30 years. France and Germany have both strongly opposed US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s call for all nations to create new funds worth 2pc of their GDP. The International Monetary Fund estimates that world governments have already poured more than $2 trillion into the global financial system.


HAHAHA.  The pirates will decamp back to their various islands!  Sail away!  And this is why I keep calling for our navy which has lots and lots if idle ships annoying China, our creditors, and take them swiftly to these many pirate coves and invade them.  Period.  Simple as pie.  Our Marines can storm the beaches and run into the small buildings there and seize the computers.  And then go to the estates of the pirates and arrest them.


Tax havens batten down as the hurricane looms | Business | The Observer


Home to 160 powerful US Congressmen, Rayburn House on Capitol Hill in Washington DC was the venue last Monday for a desperate resistance movement at its darkest hour.

In the basement of the sprawling whitewashed classical complex, 70 senior politicians and their advisers heard that prising open to increased scrutiny the secretive and corrupt world of tax havens – where trillions of dollars are stashed far from the reaches of the tax man – was akin to an evil Big Brother conspiracy that would smash civil liberties and hamper world economic growth.

It was organised by Dan Mitchell, co-founder of the right-wing Center for Freedom and Prosperity, and Richard Rahn, a senior fellow at influential libertarian Washington think-tank, the Cato Institute, a former board member of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority and a regular Washington Post columnist. They told the high-powered audience that moves to force so-called secrecy jurisdictions to share information with tax authorities were “hypocritical”, “racist” and would destroy “defenceless” island economies.

Mitchell, a high priest of light tax, small state libertarianism, argued that current moves to encourage information exchange between secretive tax havens and the international community would see unscrupulous government officials sell highly sensitive information about the world’s richest companies and individuals to drug cartels and warlords. Tax transparency would lead to kidnapping and murder.


Instead of threatening these crooks, Congress listens to them yap.  Their ‘freedom’ is the same as in ‘freebooter’.  This is like allowing the lights to go out so muggers can attack.  The biggest boost for law and order was when public lighting was invented.

(5)Promote higher corporate governance standards

Evidence abounds that boards of directors at some systemically important financial firms in the US were rendered as a “gentlemen’s club”, which rubber-stamp all major decisions sponsored by the management. Often times, the independent non-executive directors (INEDs) did not have meaningful expertise or training in financial services sector. As a result, the board is unable to provide strategic direction for the firm’s operations and effective guidance and backing for risk management and internal control. Cases also reveal that at some too-big-to-fail institutions, the risk management professionals were beholden to business people. This has led to lack of effective check and balance mechanism, which tolerated excessive risk-taking in pursuit of short-term rewards. 


HAHAHA.  The Chinese attack here is delightful!  Many of the Boards of Directors are actually BRIBERY SYSTEMS whereby the spouses or sons and daughters, etc of political powers get lots of money while ‘working’.  This is very, very widespread and should be outlawed.  Geither, the tax cheat who now runs the IRS, did this sort of faux work as fraud.


Management was motivated by short-term barometers such as quarterly results and year-end bonus. The pro-cyclical compensation structure, which rewards short-term results, doesn’t help in restraining aggressive risk-taking. In addition, decisions for succession planning and appointment of Chairman/CEO was sometimes made not on candidates’ well-rounded qualifications and merits but on factors not consistent with the interests of the shareholders and the firm’s long-term viability.  


If the US wants a 50 Year Plan, I will happily host the meetings in my basement like I did with the  Chinese.  I will provide books, pamphlets and lots of charts and graphs.  Then we can all go through all the material [this will take 2 years] and then draw up the plans.  See?  Very easy to do.


Regulators should impose higher governance standards on systemically important and internationally active financial institutions. At the minimum, the majority of their INEDs should be financially literate —HAHAHA—and can provide the management with substantive guidance in areas of the firm’s strategic positioning in the market place, balance between business expansion and quality of growth, financial innovations, succession planning and etc. The annual report of such firms should disclose how active the INEDs are with respect to the firm’s issues in and out of the boardrooms, so that investors can judge the effectiveness of the board in discharging its fiduciary duties. In some countries, it may also help to abolish the practice of the same person holding both positions of chairman and CEO, especially in those financial institutions of systemic importance.


Just too, too funny.  Now, let’s go to the distant past, about 9 years ago:






October 26, 2000


Summers is the same guy who is back, running our economic central planning committee.

I am glad to have had this opportunity to co-chair this 20th anniversary session of the US-China Joint Economic Committee with Finance Minister Xiang. Let me also thank the People’s Bank of China and other members of the Chinese delegation for their active participation at this JEC.

This year we have opened a new chapter in the relationship between our two countries – and in China’s relations with the rest of the global economy. I remember well the last JEC, a year ago in Beijing. At that time, the questions of Chinese entry into the World Trade Organization, and the changes that it would bring, were also very much on all our minds. One year on, with the signing of our bilateral agreement for Chinese entry into the World Trade Organization, and the passage of legislation here in the US to grant China Permanent Normal Trading Relations status, China is closer than ever to becoming an integral member of the world trading community. But just as this new era for China brings new possibilities, so too does it bring new challenges – both for China and for the US-Chinese relations. That is where the sharing of experiences and ideas that we have seen here today can play such a useful role.

In this context we discussed a number of issues today, including economic developments in the global economy and in the US and China. Let me just briefly highlight three sets of issues with particular relevance to China’s entry into the WTO, and to the broader question of China’s closer integration with the global community.

I. Integration and Structural Reforms in China


  • There was a clear recognition today on the part of our Chinese interlocutors that the prospect of closer integration with the world economy had raised the stakes considerably with respect to the pace and scope of economic reform. It can and must be a spur for continued reform of the state-owned enterprise sector, the financial sector and social safety nets, which are all so important to the sustainability and quality of long-term economic growth.   Notice how the tables have turned in less than a decade?  Now, China gets to lecture us about how to reform our economy and run our banking system!  And Summers talks about ‘sustainability’???? HAHAHAHA.  As well as ‘long term economic growth’.  No wonder the Chinese are poking Summers in the eye orb this week!
  • As the Chinese authorities have suggested, China’s growing private sector could play an important role in creating jobs as financial and state-owned enterprise reforms intensify. And in this context we discussed the need for further hardening of the budget constraints of state-owned enterprises, and the closure of non-viable firms.   Speaking of the devil, when will Summers tell all our zombie banks, they are finished?  And why is our government funding these zombie banks?  Isn’t this kind of wrong?
  • In the critical area of financial sector strengthening, we welcome China’s intention to liberalize interest rates and also noted the importance of adopting international banking standards. And we noted that assistance through the World Bank/IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program would provide policy advice in this crucial part of China’s reform agenda.   Summers and his buddies were in the middle of wrecking our own banking standards!  Repealing all the Great Depression rules and regulations, for example!
  • More generally, we discussed the importance of building up strong institutions to underpin sustainable, market-led growth: particularly the importance of a functioning rule of law, and of efforts to improve governance and combat corruption.   I wish we could combat corruption. There are plenty of people who should be arrested, a huge number of them in DC.  

II. The Challenge of Combating Financial Crime


  • As global integration proceeds, there has been growing international recognition of the need to combat the “dark side” of integration: the fact that technological change and liberalization can support the growth of illegitimate economic activities as much as legitimate ones. In that sense our discussions on this subject were very timely.  HAHAHA.  Our own rich being the locus of much of this illegality and criminality.
  • Financial abuse and money laundering pose an important threat to all our economies. But we were glad to note that this challenge is now a focus of strengthened efforts by the US, China and the broader international community: as, for example, in the recent agreement to establish an APEC working group that will conduct a survey of domestic legal and regulatory frameworks for fighting financial crime. This will provide an opportunity to enhance our cooperation in this area.   We should fill the prisons with the many crooks who took advantage of weak US supervision and the loss of nearly all meaningful regulations.
  • With respect to China, we are pleased to note that our Chinese counterparts have welcomed our offer to increase U.S. technical assistance to Chinese agencies working to combat this problem more directly in China itself.

III. Enforcement Issues of Particular Concern to the US Treasury Department:


  • Our meeting today also provided an opportunity to discuss other important enforcement issues that will continue to be of concern to the US and the broader global community as China becomes more integrated economically. Two issues that fall into this category that are a particular concern to the Treasury Department are the implementation of our Memorandum of Understanding on prison labor imports and enhanced customs cooperation.  The US also uses prison labor. But not for export.  Hell, we make nearly nothing for export!
  • The issue of prison labor is very important to the United States. U.S. law prohibits the importation of goods made with prison labor. It is critical that China work closely with us to effectively address this issue under the existing Memorandum of Understanding and the supplementary Statement of Cooperation.  All I can say is, what?  We didn’t want the competition?  While running all sorts of business out of our own prisons like telephone service, just to name one example.
  • With regard to customs issues, we support the continued progress of the Shanghai Model Port Project and look forward to its timely completion in the Fall of 2001, in time for the APEC Leaders meeting in Shanghai.  Ah, the Shanghai group!  I remember them fondly.  Heh.  Oh, how we debated issues long ago!  Well, the port opened and out poured an immense tide of exports.

IV. Concluding Remarks


Let me conclude by highlighting the first US-China Financial Dialogue, led by the deputies from our respective finance ministries and central banks, which will be held tomorrow. In the past, such dialogues, for example with Japan and Korea, have been a very useful part of developing our bilateral financial relationship with countries as their economies mature.

Both Japan and Korea wiped us out in the trade game.  Then China came along and followed their plans closely.  And won the game, too.

The Dialogue will be an independent venue to enhance cooperation between our two countries on financial and capital market issues and share views and experiences on areas of common concern. In light of recent experiences in Asian emerging market economies, the question of how best to benefit from a strong and open financial market – while guarding against the risks – has emerged as a crucial economic issue for every emerging market. And the US and the broader global community have an enormous stake in China finding a successful approach. Thank you.


China pushing to make Yuan world currency – China – World – The Times of India

China is assuring the United States it will do nothing to weaken the position of the dollar as the main international currency. But it is also using the financial crisis to urge foreign countries to settle payments in Yuan instead of the US dollar. 

The latest move involves a $10 billion currency swap deal with Argentina allowing importers in that country to make purchases from China in yuan instead of the dollar. Argentina on Monday became the fifth country after South Korea, Malaysia, Belarus and Indonesia to sign such a currency swap agreement with China. 

Hu likes to do business one element at a time.  He constantly circles the planet, making deals, signing treaties, he has strengthened the diplomatic position of China tremendously with much of the world.  This way, he can turn and confront Europe and the US as we try to outwit him.  

No longer is he merely signing trade treaties.  He is finessing the business relentlessly.  By controlling who and when the change over from using the US dollar to using China’s paper money is deliberate and careful.  The list of countries agreeing to this new system are interesting.

Korea hates Japan.  So they were number one on the Chinese list, being on the border of China.  China would assent to Korea being safely merged one day, under the aegis of the Dragon, of course.  It is inevitable.  This is why the Japanese refusal to pay reparations for 50 years of abuse of Korea was short sighted and foolish.

Chinese central-bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan recently threw the cat among the pigeons by calling for a new global reserve currency to replace the dollar because the US currency was extremely vulnerable to wide fluctuations during this period of financial crisis. 

I like that: throwing a cat into a flock of pigeons!  The Indian writing this article is very droll.

The statement has caused a furors across capitals of several western nations because China holds one of the biggest stock of foreign reserves. Zhou’s views have been backed by Russian officials causing a lot of worries in Washington. 

In London, the Chinese ambassador in United Kingdom, Fu Ying, was singing a different tune ahead of the coming G-20 Summit in that city. He told the BBC on Sunday that China was not calling for replacement of the dollar as the world’s main currency. Zhou was merely contributing to an old debate when he made the statement about the US dollar, he said. 

The Chinese are obviously tweeking everyone whiskers here.  Oh, this is an OLD debate?  HAHAHA.  No, obviously, it is not.  Or rather, Iran launched this debate.  And watches China most closely.  The US is being just as unreasonable and nasty towards Teheran as before, nothing has changed at all, not one thing.  Obama is increasingly, a total failure.  When it comes to change anyone can believe in.

“It has been a long debate in the world. There’s nothing new,” she said. “And China is not calling for a replacement [of the dollar]. It is an article written by the governor of the central bank on his bank’s Web site. I think he’s joining the debate.” Fu said. 

But it is Zhou who signed the currency swap deal with Central Bank of Argentina Governor Martin Redrado on Monday. The decision takes China’s plans of making the yuan an international currency far beyond its immediate neighbourhood. 

What what they do, not what they say!  And when we read that creep, Summers’ little patronizing speech, we can see how the Chinese can’t wait to dip our tail in a boiling vat of oil and watch us howl.  When we imagined, we were the sole superpower, we were a smug lot, eh?  Indeed.  Hubris is a tough shoe to eat.





P.O. BOX 483

BERLIN, NY 12022

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’




Filed under .money matters, Free Trade


  1. nah

    so i guess china is in with the elite club of super bank countries… they have enuf money to dictate markets and politics
    you win china now you can lie to the american people too

  2. nah

    enjoy my credit go corner some markets in africa and south america would you… if you let us demean ourselves enuf we mite even pay in worldoze

  3. ralph

    China loves Gold and Silver. They are buying it with both hands.

  4. Simon

    China may have promised that Korea will be united the day after US withdraws from East Asia.
    If the South Koreans remained in the West camp, it will never get united.
    See the incentives?

  5. Zak

    Chinese call for Audit of Grain Reserves
    I think we should do an Audit of Ft Knox
    Chinese style: Check Pic

  6. Simon

    More Interesting News About Algae
    the moment I see word “algae” my bullshit alarm goes way off, more than 80dBs
    The loud racket it makes 🙂

  7. Sigh. Talk about depressing, Obama being a total failure. Elaine, in the previous article you said China’s goal was to control our access to commodities, including internal to the US, forcing us to give up our soveriegnty. But that, I’m afraid, is dependent on Obama SUCCEEDING. If he fails, which the whole damned fascist right-wing of the GOP is gleefully hoping for, THEY will take over. And end up destroying everything for everybody, including the plants and animals.
    OTOH, Obama could literally crack and have the DoD and the military industrial complex go on their “final mission” which is the same thing: destroying… 😦

  8. Up in St. Louis, the local public transportation system is cutting back – SEVERELY.
    Maybe they can sell it to the Chinese.

  9. Pingback: Small Business Credit

  10. Bear of Little Brain

    I find a certain wry amusement in your gleeful attitude to the Chinese criticisms:
    1) because their own banking system is also full of “non-performing” loans, if one believes the numerous stories about this over several years (and you certainly cannot have any faith in Chinese government statistics)
    2) their own economy has been red hot for a dangerously long period, with all the usual problems of over-investment and overcapacity
    3) it is, and remains, a command economy. Many social tensions have been created. The Party will be blamed if/when the economy cools and, as far as I know, China is not an harmonious racial entity. Nor does its history lead one to assume that internal strife is unlikely
    4) most amusing is the thought that someone in China who attempted an equally critical blog of the Chinese government would have become a non-person within days, if not hours, and may even have already ‘donated’ a couple of surplus organs. Of course, the latter is based on a scurrilous myth, propagated by the West. Maybe.
    My guess is that the Party cannot afford to have the good times stop rolling. What if the US calls their bluff and allows a rapid devaluation of the USD? Paying off US debts in devalued dollars or defaulting seem to be the only options, anyway. Do you imagine the US is going to permit US debt to be re-denominated in SDR’s, or whatever currency China is pushing for? Not until the dollar has dropped to a level that makes repayment possible – probably, easily possible. This is as much about China trying to save itself from its own follies as anything else, IMO. “Paper Tiger”? Just musing.
    Interesting times, for sure.
    ELAINE: If we followed the Chinese suggestions 25 years ago and up until today, we would not be in a massive crisis today. SO WHAT IF THE SMALL BANKS IN CHINA ARE ROTTEN????? Our problem is, our CENTRAL BANK is rotten! This is the difference between a car dealership going under and GM going under.
    As for critics in China; the Chinese leadership hates my guts. They would rather I be dead. I know this because the Party Secretary called my dad and told him this! Don’t believe me if you wish. But this is true. He called my father in the middle of the night and yelled at him in 1989.


  12. JT

    According to LEAP/E2020, there are only two options left for the GlobalEurope Anticipation Bulletin N°33:
    G20 leaders who gather next April 2nd in London: either they rebuild a new international monetary system, creating the conditions for a new global system that involves all the main global players, and reducing the crisis to a maximum of 3 to 5 years; or they strive to prolong the current system, thrusting the world into a decade long tragic crisis starting at the end of 2009.

  13. Bear of Little Brain

    just re-read my comment and point 4) may be taken wrongly (bring back the Preview!). It wasn’t meant as a criticism of you. I just wanted to point out the freedoms that we have come to take for granted and that the Chinese do not have. The Chinese people have been bribed, in a sense, to accept the Party’s decrees in exchange for greater wealth. Has the Party merely been buying time? Is “free speech” the privilege of the (relatively) wealthy or something more fundamental?
    More questions than answers. Heh.

  14. Simon

    Bear of Little Brain:
    In effect what you are describing is US having control of China’s foreign exchange rates, ie forcing them up value their currency.
    If we haven’t done it yet, it’s not for lack of trying. The moment you print those US dollars, ALL currencies gain against US dollars.
    To force only the Chinese Yuan to appreciate, in exclusion to everything else, cannot be done. The simplist way to counter this attack is by printing more Yuan. This also cement Chinese exports, which you may have already noticed, ends up in Walmart.
    To pull this off, US needs to not only BEAT China, but BE China.

  15. Simon

    If only we could move their currency & interest rates as you suggested, there would not be such a big problem in the first place
    ELAINE: We can’t do anything except mass suicide via destroying the value of our own currency, ourselves. We lost control of world banking in 2007 when China surpassed Japan, our shadow banking system, in FOREX and US Treasuries holdings. China’s sovereign wealth fund is the biggest on earth. Thus, they can begin writing the rules. This speech was all about the rules we will have to obey. And frankly, most of them are very sensible.

  16. zip

    bit of topic.

    I just read (if I understand it right)…

    Why are banks different than this company (never mind how it got there..)? They (NXP) don’t ask taxpayers to bail them out (as far as I know)….

  17. openlyhidden

    so bear of little brain says “….What if the US calls their bluff and allows a rapid devaluation of the USD?….”
    what i want to know is won’t there come a time if allied economies do not “return to normal” in the next couple of years when a dollar devaluation becomes inevitable if it becomes obvious to everyone that the usa financial capitalist dollar good times are indeed gone for good?
    and isn’t the only other way for our owners to save themselves is if the rest of the world becomes even more dangerous for investment?
    so aren’t the only two options available to usa IF it becomes obvious to all that the financial capitalists time is seriously up EITHER extreme devaluation if the dollar is not going to be globally used anyway OR somehow hoping for wars and revolutions to break out among our “competition”?
    are there any other probable ways for our owners to save themselves? assuming they can’t turn usa into a complete police state full of docile afraid citizens.

  18. openlyhidden

    humm: simon says: “… To pull this off, US needs to not only BEAT China, but BE China…” explain more please?

  19. Simon

    Well, the control of a country’s own monetary policy is an important part of sovereignty.
    If a foreign country has control of another country’s monetary policies, they are essentially the government of that country, no matter what UN says

  20. Bear of Little Brain

    “The moment you print those US dollars, ALL currencies gain against US dollars.”
    Quite. But for China to maintain its dollar peg, it will also have to decide if that is still in its best interests in a global and domestic context. Devaluing (printing Yuan) against other currencies in order to maintain that peg will have repercussions (EU tariff retaliation? Rampant inflation within China?).
    oc raises a good point, though. The dollar may remain the best of a bad bunch. (Except for gold and silver? 😉 )

  21. Bear of Little Brain

    not “oc”, I meant “openly hidden”. Sorry. Early onset of senility. 😳

  22. Duski

    Here’s one more interesting piece:

    “During Jan/Feb AIG would call up and just ask for complete unwind prices from the credit desk in the relevant jurisdiction. These were not single deal unwinds as are typically more price transparent – these were whole portfolio unwinds. The size of these unwinds were enormous, the quotes I have heard were “we have never done as big or as profitable trades – ever”.

    As these trades are unwound, the correlation desk needs to unwind the single name risk through the single name desks – effectively the AIG-FP unwinds caused massive single name protection buying. This caused single name credit to massively underperform equities – run a chart from say last September to current of say S&P 500 and Itraxx – credit has underperformed massively. This is largely due to AIG-FP unwinds.”

  23. nah
    Yoo Hoo! Yes, Mr. Cop – Over THERE! (AIG)
    sooo true… here you are painted the picture… AIG was the funding conduit for structured ‘bad deals’ using tax havens to hide the cash flow to NON US ENTITIES placed by Investment banks who would be placed in bankruptcy if there exposure ever became known… it also went to bankrupt US Banks but the act in itself is fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and terrorism
    ELAINE; Great Denniger article!

  24. emsnews

    One problem people have with tough talk about the shifting sands of reality is, whenever I discuss this, I don’t cloak it all in talk about how weak someone else is when my point is to discuss our own weaknesses. The Chinese get to be as strong or weak as they wish, they can be stupid, dangerous and reckless.
    But I am interested not only in stopping our own stupidity, recklessness and dangerous stuff, I am also interested in relativity: despite all their many, many problems, China is going UP and despite many, many strengths, the US is going DOWN. This is a historic fact that cannot be ignored. Thus, I hammer away at it.
    Our rulers INSIST on taking us on the ‘down’ road, not the ‘up’ staircase. And so I yell fruitlessly. But I can’t help it. It is very childish of us to constantly point out China’s weaknesses while begging for money from them.

  25. openlyhidden

    elaine says: “Our rulers INSIST on taking us on the ‘down’ road, not the ‘up’ staircase. And so I yell fruitlessly. But I can’t help it….”
    so now i am getting old and am i the only one who has problems believing after a lifetime, nothing actually has changed for the better? has all “progress” led to a dead end? and where is the enlightenment from all our education and good intentions? what happened to all the “promise” there was when i was young?
    i want to know who fucked up! who fucked up my wet dream!
    so before i die, what i want is to read homer again from my new “old” perspective now. (not homer simpson!)
    personally i bet a lot of our failings comes from believing in 30 year old philosophers.

  26. criticalcontrarian

    Playing catch up here, but the reality is the the government is where the lousy banking supervision actually all started, where it did so well, in fact at least $2.3 Trillion worth, before it migrated to Wall Street. Great accounting practices like paying $900 for B-52 toilet seats, or selling brand new F-16’s and F-15’s to Israel as “military surplus”. And who was minding the store throughout all this, another Zionist not surprisingly, the paramount parasites. Watch @

  27. openlyhidden

    from another, larger perspective, our world, our history, our lives might seem similar to what goes on with cultures in a petri dish. don’t cultures grow until they fail once again? is that the sadistic purpose of it all? (from our own selfish little perspective of course)
    if people in general weren’t so stupid, it would be unbearable to see the truth, especially for the young i think. i am watching my 5 year old grandson right now for a little while and am noticing the commericals on his kids shows. is it just me, or are the commercials really, really loathsome in what they say and what they want and what they are doing? and the commercials for male enhancement for example in the evening shows are equally as void and revolting for what they say to us about us.
    and of course instantly some “priest” will leap up and say i must be sick thinking “sex” is revolting to defend this, our way of life….when of course the “sex” has nothing to do with it. but if we didn’t have skin, i bet paris hilton wouldn’t be such an attraction if you think about it.
    so this disappointing “nothing” is how it ends? hahahahahaha! of course not stupid! it all has to get worse, much, much worse dummy! hahahahahaha!
    and this is the truth. i personally am not a pessimist. hahahahhha! i am happy! hahahahahhahahaha!
    ELAINE: So, citizen Gamma, you took your daily dose of soma? Good.

  28. criticalcontrarian

    That video points out a lot of other very alarming things. As alarming as loosing $2.3 trillion worth of weapons and ordnance, which in my opinion is worse than loosing $2 trillion worth of paper, specially when you cannot track where and who has these weapons. Assuming 10% or $230 billion, that is enough to equip several very sizeable private armies, including countermeasures to defend against anything in the US arsenal. Not a good thought.

    I think a lot of the bailout hullabaloo is partly aimed at drawing attention away from this very dangerous and highly treasonous behavior of the government-military industrial complex. Think about it, $2.3 Trillion vaporized and not even a word, a mention, or an investigation. Zero. Nada. Zilch. Big doodoo that.
    ELAINE: If you go to Tel Aviv, you will find this stash.

  29. openlyhidden

    hello cc. so the little picture with your posts is supposed to represent a “radiant form”?
    so do you and yours get to enjoy your asian century now do you suppose? or will “unavoidable” “unexplainable” revolutions and wars happen that coincidentally will save our owners way of life?

  30. Gary

    Look at this article carefully. It just oozes with apologetics regarding
    Finance vs Workers in manufacturing. The ASSociated “Press” must be full
    of good little corporate mental clones.

    DETROIT (AP) — Many assembly line autoworkers reacted with skepticism and anger Monday to the Obama administration’s tough tactics, which stoked long-simmering feelings that the people who put the country on wheels get treated differently than the wizards of Wall Street.

    “It’s the age-old Wall Street vs. Main Street smackdown again,” said Brian Fredline, president of UAW Local 602 at a plant near Lansing. “You have all kinds of funding available to banks that are apparently too big to fail, but they’re also too big to be responsible.”

    “But when it comes to auto manufacturing and middle-class jobs and people that don’t matter on Wall Street, there are certainly different standards that we have to meet — higher standards — than the financials. That is a double standard that exists and it’s unfair,” Fredline said.

    While CEO oustings haven’t been widespread among the banking industry, the government did in September reserve the right to remove senior management at American International Group Inc. as part of its agreement to give the insurer $85 billion in emergency aid. AIG Chief Executive Robert Willumstad stepped down as part of that company’s bailout package, and the government hand-picked his successor.

    Also, banks don’t have the union and legacy costs that the automakers do, which make their products more costly versus foreign rivals.[JESUS WEPT]

    “To see the very people that drove this economy into the ground be rewarded through bonuses while receiving tax dollars is just galling,” said Dan Maloney, a machine repairman at auto supplier Delphi Corp.’s plant in Rochester, N.Y., and a union local president. “In light of that, the administration is taking it out, I believe, on the automotive sector.”

    Despite Granholm’s criticism and what many workers saw as the president’s unduly harsh treatment, Obama’s actions might not have a lasting effect on voters. [A STATEMENT OF HOPE HERE]

    “It will be accepted, grudgingly perhaps, but accepted by anybody and everybody with a brain in their heads,” said Bill Ballenger, editor of a Michigan political newsletter and a former Republican state lawmaker.

    “It’s definitely a move in the right direction,” said Tony Keros, who owns a restaurant and real estate development firm in the building. “Something has to happen.” [AND IT HAS TO HAPPEN THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST WAY..ALL

  31. criticalcontrarian

    hey OH, how goes it? My avatar is actually an astral form. It is Seraph from the Matrix movie, the one who protected the Oracle. It resonated with me. It was that or V, LOL. Both warriors. Past lives die hard, my friend.

    Unavoidable and unexplainable revolutions will always be around for as long as humanity exists. It’s in our mindset. Asia is ascendant no doubt but it will still be a little bit before things settle. We are doing much better here than other parts of Asia, I count my blessings. My intuition tells me its going to be a slow burn, not a mass conflagration event. The boys printing money are guaranteeing that as we speak.

    As for our “owners”, their way of life will never be the same again, they will have to adapt and overcome. That is the problem with up, the higher you are, the longer the drop. We all have or will go through that sometime, it’s part of the process.

  32. openlyhidden

    so it all comes down to this:
    Cops Bust Stool Fool
    Ohio man arrested for drunk driving on a homemade vehicle
    MARCH 31–In a law enforcement first, Ohio cops this month arrested a man for drunk driving on a motorized bar stool
    the elite powers have their secret orgys in expensive climates and the best of the rest of us have our motorized bar stools.

  33. Bear of Little Brain

    Since you mentioned Delphi:
    “March 31 (Bloomberg) — Delphi Corp., the bankrupt former parts subsidiary of General Motors Corp., agreed to sell its remaining global suspension and brake business to China’s BeijingWest Industries Co.

    The brake and suspension unit employs 3,000 and has facilities in Poland, China, Mexico, France and the U.S.”
    [Bloomberg, today]
    And so it goes…

  34. emsnews

    Thanks, Bear, see? China is BUYING as everyone is SELLING.

  35. Gary

    Hey Openly
    My uncle often told me that the worst thing you could say about somebody
    was that, “they dont have a sense of humor”
    This whole country is getting like this as you can see from your article
    about the motorized bar stool. Often times I’ll crack a joke about things
    in a line of people. All I get back are blank or humorless stares.
    Humor is a sign of cultural vitality and when people cant laugh about
    things anymore, its either a sign that they’re zombies, or they are
    ready to do some damage to you.
    and so it goes

  36. Simon

    There is no dollar peg since 2007,or am I missing something?

  37. emsnews

    Simon, there is a FICTION of a dollar peg but it is getting more and more into ‘fairy tale’ status. Note the Chinese warnings.


  39. Rowan

    Give Mr. Wygle Waggoner`s job! Who said the U.S. automotive industry was dead!

  40. Simon

    After IMF and G7 bitched too much about the dollar peg I am sure the Chinese dropped it in favor of a basket of currencies
    And the CNY then appreciated SLOWLY, too slow to be of any use in international trade scene

  41. criticalcontrarian

    Gary: I know what you mean, a sense of humor is one of the best qualities Filipinos possess, in the worst of times and in dire straits they can and will have a sense of humor. It is a great part of the resiliency of our people. For a long time life in this country was relatively easy, you plant anything, it grows. Still does. Contentment was easy, people simple.

    However, with the advent of consumerism and the mall culture I have noticed a gradual change. The creation of myraid desires causes greed and creates unnecessary stress; the loss of the things we really don’t need, but think we do, can be quite distressing to those with a base mindset. But even then, our people remain resilient. Just the other day, as I waited for my meeting, I overheard a secretary talking to an officemate, she was asking her to buy an order of cooked rice and that she would share her the can of spicy tuna, for lunch. Think about that, a can of spicy tuna and an order of rice, for two people. A US$0.70 proposition, and all the while they were laughing and joking about it. You just got to love these people, kind hearted. The girl offering her spicy tuna was out $0.62 against the rice providers $0.08, so add generosity in the face of poverty to the mix, as well.

  42. criticalcontrarian

    On topic, another reason to carefully tread on the Chinese is their capacity to defend against and deter American super carriers, or any aircraft carrier for that matter. The modified Dong Feng 21 missile has a range of 2,000 km. (1,200 mi.) and travels at a speed of Mach 10 allowing it to hit its taget 12 minutes after launch, while its low radar signature and maneuverability make it almost impossible to counter. This with a conventional warhead. The kinetic energy transfer of a 2,000kg missile flying at Mach 10 is tremendous, kind of like a man getting hit by .44 caliber slug with the velocity of a NATO 5.56mm round. Read about it @

  43. criticalcontrarian

    Elaine: you are correct, all the missing ordnance is in Israel protecting the stash of the Rottens, COA (Care of America). Thank you very much.

  44. Elaine and all, Just re-read my first comment in this thread (7th comment) that “THEY” in If he fails, which the whole damned fascist right-wing of the GOP is gleefully hoping for, THEY will take over. could easily be interpreted to mean the Chinese! No, I did not mean that. I meant “THEY” to be the right-wing fascists in the GOP.

  45. Openly Hidden, just in case i never say it or no one does, i think some of your posts here are the most deeply felt pieces of writing i’ve seen anywhere.

  46. emsnews

    True, Ziff House.

  47. Pingback: Baby name meaning and origin for Xiang

  48. Nicely written content and knowledge – I have bookmarked your blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s