First, the good news: Watchdog Report Says N.S.A. Program Is Illegal and Should End – NYTimes.com and this is all about our Constitutional rights of privacy which are being violated left and right and basically have ceased to exist:
The program “lacks a viable legal foundation under Section 215, implicates constitutional concerns under the First and Fourth Amendments, raises serious threats to privacy and civil liberties as a policy matter, and has shown only limited value,” the report said. “As a result, the board recommends that the government end the program.”
The wholesale spying on everyone on earth has been very valuable…to the richest elites. They have various goals none of which are good for the US public or the world. Not happy with merely being much richer than half of the world’s population put together, they want to be richer than all of the world’s population. And they have their pet peeves one of which is the desire to have Israel run the world’s affairs so they can do ethnic cleansing and no one can dispute their economic or political control of all nations.
The Huffington Post has pretty much supported Snowden from the start and the New York Times has decided to be somewhat fair unlike the Washington Post which has supported Snowden’s revelations by publishing them, more or less, but the Zionist stable of screamers are 100% against Snowden. Here is a recent Huffington Post story about the Sunday TV Zionist screamers (non-AIPAC tools never are allowed to appear, of course): Sunday Shows Asked Pretty Weak Questions About Incendiary Snowden Claims
Mike Rogers and Dianne Feinstein, head of the House and Senate intelligence committees, respectively, both made headlines for speculating that Snowden was working for the Russians or some other foreign power. Rogers made the claim on both “Meet the Press” and “Face the Nation.”
Snowden told the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer that the claims were false, but he also said media outlets were “[reporting] statements that the speakers themselves admit are sheer speculation” and were “abdicating their responsibility to hold power to account.”
Oh, the horror! Someone cooperating with Russia! Can’t be allowed! How dare someone living in a foreign country control Congress? This is a most interesting position for rampant dual citizen Israelis and their AIPAC puppets to take. Being totally devoid of any shame, they don’t consider the fact that their own huge interference with US affairs, driven by their allegiance to a foreign state, is illicit, treasonous and dangerous!
Nope. They fling treason charges against Snowden while ignoring their obvious, blatant treason. Of course, they depend greatly on our media owners, most of the bigger ones being rampant Zionists, to keep the general public innocently clueless about AIPAC power in DC. But the wall of silence is breaking down fast thanks to the internet and thanks greatly to citizen comments to articles where many, many people mention AIPAC and Zionism these days.
The solution some of the media has taken are childishly simple: banning anyone mentioning AIPAC is done by both right and left sites. Eliminating comments entirely is another desperate resort but that kills readership. So we have the NYT simply not allowing comments on any article talking about Israel and the rare articles talking about AIPAC which are done about once a decade.
The Washington Post mentions AIPAC more often but is doing the ‘ban anyone talking about AIPAC’ game. But so far, at the Huffington Post, US citizens are allowed to mention AIPAC and even criticize AIPAC! I wonder when that will end.
Here is one stunning headline today at the Huffington Post, one we will never, ever see in the US mainstream media: AIPAC Goes After Jewish Dem Leader — For Fighting Against War Bill! One of Congress’s Most Pro-Israel Lawmakers Isn’t Pro-Israel Enough for AIPAC:
A recent letter attacking Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is causing an internal brouhaha at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, The Cable has learned. The powerful lobbying outfit, known for its disciplined non-partisan advocacy for Israel, recently issued an action alert about the Florida congresswoman’s waffling on Iran sanctions legislation. The letter urged members to contact Wasserman Schultz and cited a disparaging article about her in a conservative website founded by a prominent Republican political operative.
That AIPAC was driving hard for new Iran sanctions legislation surprised no one. But its use of a right-wing blog to target a well-connected Jewish Democrat with a long history of support for Israel raised eyebrows among some current and former AIPAC officials. It also raised concerns that AIPAC’s open revolt against the White House’s Iran diplomacy could fray its relations with liberal Democrats on the Hill.
AIPAC runs both political parties. This leads to great confusion when we have primaries which is the ONLY time US citizens can vote for anyone they wish. In general, they tend to vote for people that irritate AIPAC which then has to waste money on primaries to keep anti-AIPAC candidates locked out like they locked out Ron Paul.
If an anti-AIPAC person is elected, they go to him or her and offer them this deal: join with us or we will destroy you with the media and running candidates in PRIMARIES against you so you have to waste all your donations fighting every election before the general election. Even Rand Paul bowed to them after winning his major election.
Back in September, one of the resident army of Zionists who run amok at the Washington Post, Max Fischer, had this totally misleading editorial about AIPAC lobbying: Who’s afraid of AIPAC: Is everything we think about lobbying and foreign policy wrong? Remember, these Zionists at the top know exactly how the game is played and are not innocent bystanders but rather, the media enforcers of AIPAC goals:
Take two recent examples: first, the Obama administration’s ill-fated plan to launch limited strikes against Syria and, second, the not-much-more successful U.S.-led effort to hunt down the Lord Resistance Army, a Central African militia-cult led by Joseph Kony. Both of these plans called for exposing limited American assets in pursuit of an idealistic humanitarian goal halfway around the world. Both were risky and lacked either an obvious American constituency or much immediate benefit for the United States. And both were pushed by an idealistic group of administration insiders.
Here’s where it gets interesting: these two U.S. foreign policy missions were backed by two very, very different lobbying groups. If the conventional wisdom about lobbying and U.S. foreign policy were true, we would expect Obama to have received wide support for his Syria plan and basically zero support for the Central African hunt for Kony. But that’s the opposite of how it turned out.
First of all, the US declared ten years ago, we are going to greatly expand US military domination of Africa and so this is part of the ‘dominate Africa’ work. Using citizen groups as cover for this effort of colonial control, the US has destroyed democracies or attacked fairly liberal rulers there such as Gaddafi who was VERY liberal giving women civil rights, increasing the education levels of all citizens and national healthcare, etc. In Egypt, the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia joined forces to destroy the feeble attempt at democracy in Egypt and our media has suddenly found no time to talk about Egypt as the brutal junta crushes the people and runs fake votes where less than 38% of the people participate.
Max Fischer, one of a zillion Jewish ‘pundits’ that plague our media, knows that AIPAC’s power is tremendous whereas the small group opposing Kony in Africa are tiny and have zero power over Congress. He knows perfectly well that the anti-Kony people used public sentiment to go after him whereas the Zionists control our media and blast us with propaganda which has begun to fail and they menace Congress, not persuade Congress.
So this lying bastard has to pretend innocence and an inability to understand how power works which is silly since he knows extremely well how it works and is actually misdirecting people hoping they can’t figure this out. Desperately, the Zionists try to pull off their illusions while the audience increasingly sees the strings, misdirections and levers being pulled.
What is funnier is how even in Israel, the war push by AIPAC is also very unpopular: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/poll…
‘According to the study’s finding, 77 percent of Israeli respondents and 82 percent of Palestinian resopndents said that an Israeli attack on Iran would result in a major regional confrontation.
Regarding the possibility of an Israeli strike without U.S. backing, 65 percent of Israelis were against such a course of action, an increase from 52 percent in June. In addition, only 18 percent of Israelis said they supported an Israeli attack on Iran without U.S. backing.’
Most Americans do not want war with Iran. The Jews do want a war in Israel but only if US citizens die, US citizens pay for everything and all the burden is on us, not them! Thank you! Congress is trapped. They told us in no uncertain terms on the right, that the US is broke and has no money for US citizens while at the same time these same right wingers are telling us we have enough money for more spying, more wars!
Worse are the fake liberals. Supporting fascism if Jews are fascists, they have to beg us to go to war with Muslims all the time while telling us, it is OK to run up immense government debts with the LBJ ‘guns and butter’ program which is a total disaster, too.
Here is another Zionist misdirection editorial by David Ignatius: An emerging market problem – The Washington Post: this really nasty example of Zionist belligerence has to keep telling us we are ‘strong’ and ergo, should go to war against billions of people on behalf of Israel and Saudi Arabia and Japan. Abe tells world to stand up to China or face consequences at Davos. Abe’s Yen Exporting Deflation Risks Davos Tension notes Businessweek.
Japan’s devaluation is typical in all depressions. This increases penetration of foreign markets in this case, the US and EU. Japan wants no imports and more exports and this is a blatant attack on Japan’s closest allies. The US is warning China and other Asian nations to not do this but they are getting restive since Japan is doing this to them as well as the US.
Japan and Israel have undue influence on US foreign policy and both do blatant bribery and pay people to run against anyone who votes against the will of both nations. This is why the US is nearly totally silent about Fukushima, for example. And why our media has virtually no Fukushima stories or any stories about Palestinian suffering. It has been edited out of our news stream.
P.O. BOX 483
BERLIN, NY 12022
Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’
Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.