NYT Wonders Why US Diplomacy Has No Power Over Netanyahu Who Controls Congress Via AIPAC

The slide into fascism is obvious to me.  Fascists hate women’s rights, for example.  They can be of any culture or belief system or religion or tribe.  Fascists believe that ‘blood’ determines citizenship, and that ethnic tensions are best handled by either eviction of other citizens or annihilation of various tribal or religious groups.  It leads to endless wars and redrawing of borders to match population occupation by ‘blood’.  Hitler often talked about ‘blood’ as do Zionists.  Religious terrorism and wars are spreading rapidly within nations, destroying them.


The US invented the concept of ‘citizenship’ based on the Roman Empire example whereby, after several centuries, Rome made everyone ‘citizens’.  From the beginning, the concept of ‘citizenship’ had severe problems in the US due to the army of kidnapped African slaves forced to work for free for Europeans who invaded North America and the native Indian tribes who were not citizens at all but treated as ‘aliens’ in their own homelands.


The tensions from the foundation of the US as a ‘nation with citizens who have civil rights’ continues to this day as the denial of citizenship to various religions and tribes and people rises overseas as well as at home.  Here is a bizarre NYT article about the latest Jewish mass murder attempt that shows how incapable our media is at discussing fascism:  U.S. Diplomacy on Gaza Has Little Sway on Israel – NYTimes.com


“This is the most sustained period of antagonism in the relationship,” said Daniel C. Kurtzer, a former American ambassador to Israel who now teaches at Princeton. “I don’t know how the relationship recovers as long as you have this president and this prime minister.”


And yet, with public opinion in both Israel and the United States solidly behind the Israeli military’s campaign against Hamas, no outcry from Israel’s Arab neighbors, and unstinting support for Israel on Capitol Hill, President Obama has had few obvious levers to force Mr. Netanyahu to stop pounding targets in Gaza until he was ready to do it…


The White House seems determined to tamp down the latest eruption in tensions. “The nature of our relationship is strong and unchanged,” the press secretary, Josh Earnest, told reporters on Monday, pointing to comments by Mr. Netanyahu over the weekend, in which he said, “I think the United States has been terrific.”


Nowhere in this news story is AIPAC mentioned.  Since the owners of the NYT are long term members of AIPAC, this failure to inform is sad.  AIPAC’s many meetings are never covered by the NYT even though the owners participate but then, the NYT won’t cover Bilderberg meetings where the staff and owners heavily attend, too!


Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu Speech at the Joint Session of Congress where he declares he will never return to 1967 borders and intends to steal all of Jerusalem – May 24, 2011 – YouTube


How can Americans form any opinion about Israel’s dominance of our government if no media covers this topic, ever?  When Netanyahu came to DC to defy Obama, virtually everyone in Congress jumped out of their seats to scream  Sieg Heil and clap yet this wan’t broadcast to all the US on all channels or any channels.


Yes, the video of this disgrace exists on You Tube but only a few eyes know to seek it out.  If information is totally hidden by our media, it is difficult for anyone to find it out by accident.  The heavy blanket of censorship lies over our nation with much of the most important activities in DC nearly totally hidden from view so voters go into elections with near-zero information of what their representatives really do.  This is true of all lobbying operations but AIPAC in particular is kept carefully concealed even as Zionist neocons run nearly all of our foreign policies.


Iran’s TV does cover the truth about Zionism:  PressTV – Annihilate Gaza: Israeli official


The Israeli official also called for “the conquest of the entire Gaza Strip.” He spoke of plans for the destruction of Gaza, which would include expelling residents and shipping them across the world.


Feiglin also wrote about his plans in a letter addressed to Netanyahu, in which he said he wanted the measures to be enforced as soon as possible.


In the letter, Feiglin said he wanted Israeli military forces to find areas on the Sinai border to set up “tent encampments… until relevant emigration destinations are determined.” Furthermore, he wants Gaza’s electricity and water supplies to be disconnected before shelling the besieged area “with maximum fire power.”


The Israeli forces would then “exterminate” resistance centers and Israeli law would be extended to cover the entire Gaza Strip and “the city of Gaza and its suburbs will be rebuilt as true Israeli touristic and commercial cities.”


Fascism is the same no matter which guise it wears.  Jews can be Nazis just like anyone else, even more so since they first came up with the concept of ethnic cleansing based on US actions to annihilate and lock into hopeless ghettos, all the natives of North America.  Here is how Hitler’s thinking evolved over time:  Hitler’s Letter to Adolf Gemlich, September 1919




“Jewry is unqualifiedly a racial association and not a religious association … Its influence will bring about the racial tuberculosis of the people. Hence it follows: Anti-Semitism on purely emotional grounds will find its ultimate expression in the form of pogroms. Rational anti-semitism, however, must lead to a systematic legal opposition and elimination of the special privileges which Jews hold, in contrast to the other aliens living among us. Its final objective must unswervingly be the removal of the Jews altogether. Only a government of national vitality is capable of doing both, and never a government of national impotence.”


Compare that to the obvious expulsion/exploitation/annihilation demands of Feiglin in Israel!  Hitler Speech in Nuremburg in 1923


“The internal expurgation of the Jewish spirit is not possible in any platonic way. For the Jewish spirit is the product of the Jewish person. Unless we expel the Jewish people. Unless we expel the Jewish people soon, they will have judaized our people within a very short time.”


Germany was being ‘judaized’ rapidly by aping the Zionist plans which predate Naziism by many years.  U.S. Indian Policy, 1815-1860: Removal to Reservations particularly starting with Andrew Jackson’s calls for Indian removal.  Like slavery and the resulting degradation of the black African population, Andrew Jackson tried to figure out the morals of stealing native American lands from the people who lived here before the European invasion:


Actuated by this view of the subject, I informed the Indians inhabiting parts of Georgia and Alabama that their attempt to establish an independent government would not be countenanced by the Executive of the United States, and advised them to emigrate beyond the Mississippi or submit to the laws of those States.


Our conduct toward these people is deeply interesting to our national character. Their present condition, contrasted with what they once were, makes a most powerful appeal to our sympathies. Our ancestors found them the uncontrolled possessors of these vast regions.


By persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain, until some of the tribes have become extinct and others have left but remnants to preserve for a while their once terrible names.


Surrounded by the whites with their arts of civilization, which by destroying the resources of the savage doom him to weakness and decay, the fate of the Mohegan, the Narragansett, and the Delaware is fast over-taking the Choctaw, the Cherokee, and the Creek. That this fate surely awaits them if they remain within the limits of the States does not admit of a doubt.


Humanity and national honor demand that every effort should be made to avert so great a calamity. It is too late to inquire whether it was just in the United States to include them and their territory within the bounds of new States, whose limits they could control. That step can not be retraced. A State can not be dismembered by Congress


The average European invader called the natives ‘savages’ and any fighting by the natives to stop this mass invasion of foreigners was deemed ‘terrorism’ and justified the annihilation/suppression/ ghettoization of the natives.  Diseases unknown to all natives of North and South America decimated populations by 50% or more making the annihilation of the survivors much easier.


This dark history of the US plagues us today as our rulers strive to paint us as moral, upstanding, good people who care about others and practices citizenship of all people.  But the truth is dark indeed. The only reason we had the Civil Rights Act at all was to rebuke Russia and China both of whom correctly pointed out that the US was a racist, evil empire, not a prime example of how a nation should form.


The Zionists have been Nazis from day one.  The comments made by Zionists today are starkly identical to Hitler’s thinking.  READ BLUMENFELD’S REQUEST to Hitler in 1933, where they want to have Hitler help them take over Palestine but Hitler refuses:


The Zionist Federation of Germany submits a position paper to Hitler regarding the Jews of Germany. The paper reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.” Chairman of the Federation Kurt Blumenfeld submitted a request to meet with Hitler and discuss the proposal. Hitler declined.


Thanks to our media, most Americans support ethnic cleansing and religious warfare:  Poll: 5 Times More Religious Americans Pro-Israel – News from America – News – Arutz Sheva


Among religious groupings, sympathy for Israelis among U.S. Jews stands at 93%, compared with 79% of Mormons interviewed across the 14-year time span. Protestant support for Israel is 66%, and 59% among Catholics. Even among those who said they had no formal religious identity, 45% express more sympathy for Israelis and 25% for the Palestinian Arabs.


The Gallup poll also checked political party identification, finding that Republicans are much more sympathetic to the Israelis than are Democrats. In parallel, it was found that Republicans attend religious services more frequently than Democrats. As many as 80% of weekly church-attending Republicans are more sympathetic toward Israeli, dropping somewhat to 65% among Republicans who never attend church.


The Jews are badgering the few media people who dare to defy Naziism:  Bennett Asks Hostile Anchor: ‘What Would You Do?’ – Global Agenda – News – Arutz Sheva


 Faced with increasingly malicious journalists, Israel’s spokesmen are doing their best to justify to the world the civilian death toll in Gaza…


Economics Minister Naftali Bennett asked SkyNews’s anchor, repeatedly, what she would do if she were being fired at by a person who held up his own child as a human shield. She did not answer.


Hitler claimed that the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto were killing German soldiers and hiding weapons where there were children, etc.  Nazis, whether Jewish or German, will invade people’s homes, bomb people’s homes or UN shelters and then claim that they were forced to kill the children because the parents were resisting invasion!


Here are some of the Nazi-style comments from Jews reading this Arutz Sheve news site:


Dov Bar-Leib · Top Commenter · Whitfield School
Stop trying to explain the concept of “human decency” to a world that is not pre-disposed towards it anymore. In the war against a wicked world where most of Mankind falls on the side of Evil, you are not going to win a public relations contest trying to define what is good and moral for them.


These people need to be destroyed. We should NOT be desiring that they be on our side. As we head into this Shmittah year, a lot of these people won’t make it out of that year into year 8 anyway. So explaining human decency to people who are destined to die is a fool’s errand.


Zalman Orlianski · Kaunas Politechnical Institute
Most of civilians in Gaza are not innocent civilians. Where do you think Hamas recruiting all their fighters from? They all hate Jews, and support Hamas in refusing Israel right to exist.


Note how the Jews here talk about ‘human decency’ here and then one breath later, demand the right to destroy all Palestinians resisting Jewish invaders!  ‘Decency’ for a Zionist is total surrender, handing over one’s homes, goods and then becoming a stateless refugee!  Exactly the Nazi solution for Jews!


The fascists in Ukraine are being resisted, too, and call Russian resistors all sorts of names including ‘terrorist’ and the investigation of the Malay plane continues with the most likely outcome being the exact opposite of US/EU bellowing about Russia causing the crash.

400 Ukraine Troops Defect – ‘Kiev Gave Up On Us’ – Vid as Antiwar Protests Spreading in Ukraine.  The expulsion of all Russian Orthodox citizens is the agenda in Ukraine.


sunset borger

side picture begging boneEmail:




209 Greenhollow Rd

Petersburgh, NY 12138

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.


sunset borger


Filed under .diplomacy, religion

12 responses to “NYT Wonders Why US Diplomacy Has No Power Over Netanyahu Who Controls Congress Via AIPAC

  1. shawntoh

    Meanwhile, the United States has now lost a general, the highest ranking soldier so far, as being reported by The NY Times this morning.

  2. shawntoh

    Der Krieg verloren.

  3. emsnews

    Yes, the general was ‘training’ Afghanis teaching them how to fight using our arms and an Afghani returned the favor and taught the general how people fight in real life, not via war games.


    I said from day one, no one has to teach the Afghanis how to fight, they teach US. Since before Alexander the Great, no less.

  4. Petruchio

    I suppose the NYT also wonders what all those dual Israeli/US citizens are doing in the US government? The charade isn’t even amusing anymore. The NYT is a propaganda rag of the elites; that’s why they don’t care about their dwindling readership. Once the media in the US was allowed to be bought by 5 corporations, it was only a matter of time before only the Party line was allowed. It’s funny. Russian media is more reliable than US media nowadays. Maybe that was always the case? In another front: mention was made of the political group the “Know Nothings” last night–think it was the PBS channel. Anyways, this was a group that was opposed to immigration during around the mid 19th century. One of the things that the Know Nothings endorsed was a rule for becoming a citizen. The KN’s position was that a person had to actually LIVE in the US for 21 years before they could become citizens. I think 21 years is a bit long, but I agree with the concept completely. I think a person should have to live–and pay taxes–for a period of time BEFORE they can even apply for citizenship. How long? Specific time isn’t real important, but I would say someone should have to live in the US–conditionally, meaning they can be deported, for around 4 years. I especially endorse a waiting period for citizenship during bad economic times. If a government has to prioritize, citizens who have been here longer-and been taxpayers longer-go ahead of people who just got here. Imho, the US has NO obligation to be the world’s caretaker. And spare me the spiel about the Statue of Liberty(“give me your poor. your weak, blah blah blah)

  5. melponeme_k

    The control over the media is so outrageous now, there is no more ruse to hide it. You can see it on every major news site where they only allow Facebook commentators (all the better to track you my dear) and even still cherry picking comments to generate false support for elite issues.

  6. shawntoh

    Elaine, you could have simply pointed out the failed Nixon policy of Vietnamization –and just only going back to the years of 1969 to 1975 as a lesson not to do the same thing in Afghanistan.

  7. emsnews

    The Pentagon and our rulers learned NOTHING from the Vietnam war. I said this back in 1980 and I say it today.

    NOTHING. Not a single thing has been learned nor has diplomacy grown up to adulthood, it is increasingly childish as it gets more fascist.

  8. Luc

    petruchio, the Statue has nothing to do with immigration and everything to do w liberty. A zionist who wanted USA to be ‘weak and multi cultural’ and wanted a Zion [all white] for her own people somehow had that DREADFUL poem put on the statue. ‘ spare me the spiel about the Statue of Liberty(“give me your poor. your weak, blah blah blah)’.

    …………google ’emma lazarus’.

  9. JimmyJ

    The IDF tapped the US Secretary of State’s unencrypted calls while trying to broker a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, Der Spiegel reports sources as saying.

    The Reg:

    Der Speigel:

  10. tfoth

    The Pentagon has 3 objectives:

    1. Loot our national resources;
    2. Get wars started; and
    3. Keep the wars going.

    We would be much better off shutting it down and turning it into, for example, a pinball arcade.

  11. Petruchio

    Luc: the Statue of Liberty means EVERYTHING to immigrants. It’s like the first thing theywould see of the USA if they arrived in this country by ship in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. The original meaning of the “Give me your poor…” is lost on immigrants. The point I was trying to make is that in no way, shape or form should illegal aliens come to this country, have a baby and Voila!! they have given birth to a US citizen. So they get to stay. That’s like saying if you rob a bank and make it out the door with the money, you get to keep it. No, not in Petruchio’s world. Unrestricted immigration is the agenda of the elites; they want to drive wages down, thereby destroying the Middle Class.It also creates an environment conducive to racial wars and NOT Class wars. A class war is THE #1 nightmare of the ruling elites. They know hostility towards the wealthy can spell their doom. It’s why they spend so much time misdirecting their potential enemies.

  12. emsnews

    This is why a flood was let in after the Civil War: to displace the Western native Indians and worse, to replace the SLAVES because free blacks didn’t want to work for nothing anymore, now that they were free. Jim Crow was brutally imposed as a flood of ‘white’ foreigners poured in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s