Black Thugs Get Guardian Green Light To Be Bad As Possible


Screen shot 2014-12-01 at 4.30.41 PM


The liberal push to tell all black people that they have zero reason to change themselves, they have zero responsibility for their own behaviors and that is is OK to be thugs, rioters, crooks, thieves, murderers, rapists and terrorists…continues in this huge reguritation that infuriates me.  I remember when things changed definitely for the worse.  It was the summer of 1977 when mostly black neighborhoods burst into outright looting, arson and terror when the lights simply went out during a thunderstorm!  And this riot went on not for a day or a week but for years afterwards!


First, the article from the British paper about these endless riots and crimes going on in the name of ‘we surrender/save black males’ which illustrate exactly why police have ended up shooting black males in the first place, the liberals continue to dash gasoline on these fires:  Bill Cosby’s pound cake, Ferguson and the dubious politics of personal responsibility | Gary Younge | Comment is free | The Guardian


Brown allegedly stole cigarillos shortly before he was shot. Real or imagined, they were his pound cake. Since the shooting, conservatives have been portraying Brown as a violent “thug” and thief, as though such qualities, even if accurate, would qualify a man for summary execution. Never mind that he was unarmed, that his dead body was left in the street for four hours. What the hell was he doing with those cigarillos?


Brown wasn’t ‘executed’ because he was a crook or because he attacked a much smaller store clerk.  He was shot because like Trayvvon, he attacked someone who was armed.  Thinking he could beat up/kill the person he was attacking, to his shock, the opponent proved to be more dangerous than he thought.


I decided to see if there were any videos of the riots of NYC in 1977.  Here is one that really enraged me greatly:

Go to 12 minutes into this video about the blackout looting riots of 1977, the one I was in and feared for my life as my neighbors looted and then burned down a huge hunk of my neighborhood as well as lots of NYC.


This big black dude grins ear to ear as he openly boasts about being the one to first rip down the crime grates from an electronics store so he could steal some DJ equipment for his own business! He isn’t ashamed, he is delighted as he admits to being a criminal!


“Ha, ha, ha…I just had to take that equipment, I wanted to be a DJ!” this criminal chortles. Another good bud says, ‘There weren’t many DJs but the very next day (actually, we didn’t have electricity for more than a day!) sprang up a whole lot of DJs. That was a huge spark inna hip hop culture…”


This was right at the beginning of the glorification of the thug culture.  Already, the Bronx had been nearly totally destroyed by these urchins.  Now, in one night, they turned a huge hunk of the city into the South Bronx and it took years and years to recover and rebuild and only after the gangs made it so uninhabitable, even they had to flee and being deserted, others who build things, moved in.  People like myself.


Virtually none of the security gates in black neighborhoods withstood the gangs assaulting them and most were peeled back and the stores looted and then set on fire.  The two in my community that didn’t burn had owners, their dogs and their guns defying the looters.  One man was shot by one of the store owners.  This stopped the mob.


In Ferguson, the mobs simply came back over and over again, burning the stores and finally pretty much wiping out the commercial parts of the city which will now lie in ruins for half a century or more.  Maybe, forever.


Liberals who should know better  publish lies all the time, here is an example:  NBC: Rebirth of the South Bronx – US news | NBC News


Community involvement: torchers
Landlords may not have been residents of the community, but that did not stop them from organizing the torchings.


Anthony Ortillo, a resident of the South Bronx for more than 62 years, remembers when it all began. “I was offered money to burn buildings,” Ortillo said. And the going rate of $200 to burn down a few buildings was a very attractive proposition in an area rife with unemployment and poverty.
Ortillo said the landlords made it easy. “They would leave the basement open and give you the keys. The gasoline would be waiting for you in the basement, and you would set the building on fire, and everybody would profit.”


Though Ortillo maintains he never took part in this process, he said “burning for profits” was common throughout the community, and “everyone used to make money.”


The landlord was not the only person to profit as the fire starter collected $200 and some residents on welfare were able to claim property reimbursement checks ranging from $1,500 to $3,000.
Surprisingly, there were no deaths associated with the torching, as they were well organized and always announced. “You would be walking down the street, and people would say don’t come home tonight cause we gonna set the building on fire,” explained Ortillo.


Why the surprise that most of these arsons didn’t kill the tenants??? THEY were the arsonists!  I knew not one landlord who paid anyone to torch a building.  The city rewarded arsonists and they went wild.  We ended up having a patrol to see if tenants were moving their electronics and goodies out of an apartment without telling the landlord or being evicted.  This meant they planned to torch the building and so we would then stand around right on the stoop and tell them, ‘We see you, don’t set any fires’.


They often would snarl and snap but we stood our ground.  We had to stop them!  Their fires would go beyond their own apartments and hit our homes, too!  Life and death!


No arsonists would go around announcing they were going to burn buildings down unless they were muscling someone.  Ortillo, the chap in the article, claims when he and his buddies decided to stop burning buildings and tell people to flee, it stopped.  In a rat’s ass!


What stopped it was the end of the Beame administration and the new mayor, Koch, cracking down on all this.  And I was cracking the whip on Koch. If he heeded the liberals and didn’t reward welfare families using arson to get into public housing, I would run petitions against him, too, like I did to Beame.


We had to push and push hard to increase police patrols and to stop the arson and looting and to put people in prison for doing both.  It was a very hard battle and still ongoing with blacks insisting their freedom means antisocial destructive behaviors that destroy cities. This is unacceptable.


Ferguson day at the White House: What did Obama accomplish? This is so sad. Obama has to look like he is doing something.

sunset borger

side picture begging boneEmail:



209 Greenhollow Rd

Petersburgh, NY 12138

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.


sunset borger


Filed under .money matters, Politics

15 responses to “Black Thugs Get Guardian Green Light To Be Bad As Possible

  1. CK

    Eric Holder well understood that one does not bit the hand that will soon be feeding it. He has invested 6 years at $199,700 ( approximately $1.2 million before taxes) for a payout of $77 million/annum. That is a return on investment of 6,500%. Take that stock market studiers.

  2. vengeur

    OMG! Holder, who spent his time looking for racists and domestic terrorists under every bed and in every coat closet in the US, now gets a 77million retirement from the criminal wall street banksters he ignored for six years.

  3. emsnews

    Yup. He was bought from day 1.

    Look: all the GOP asses did the exact same thing, too!!!! Everyone we send to DC do this except for those who are assassinated or shoved out of the public eye by the media bosses.

    All these guys are also BILDERBERG gangsters!!!

    Sad, isn’t it?

  4. vengeur

    77 million a year plus bonuses! They are so arrogantly shameless they don’t even TRY to hide their pay off!

  5. Christian W

    Yeah, Holder got his reward for hiding the crimes of the Wall Street cabal. He not only ignored them, he actively worked to cover the tracks for the banks. Holder was a driving force behind too big to jail policies and if someone started to get too close to a bank he derailed the investigation to get the case to go over the time limit and become too old to bring to court. Instead Obama and Holder went aggressively after the whistleblower and prosecuted them! Bastards.

    Matt Taibbi has written extensively about it.

  6. Christian W

    Mike Whitney wrote an interesting piece a while ago:


    Why would the media scrub any mention of Dominique Strauss-Kahn from its coverage? Could it be that (according to NPR):

    “The IMF’s managing director wanted to give Greece, Portugal and Ireland the time needed to put their accounts in order, and he also argued for softening the austerity measures associated with the bailouts for those countries.

    Greek economists say that under Strauss-Kahn’s leadership, the IMF was a counterbalance to the strict austerity policies favored by northern European leaders. In fact, according to the daily Le Monde, Strauss-Kahn is fond of calling those who argue for tighter austerity “fous furieux,” which roughly translates as “mad men.”

    Strauss-Kahn’s view is that shock-therapy measures imposed on Greece and other European countries with sovereign debt crises will lead only to economic recession and severe social unrest.

    Several commentators pointed out Monday that at a time of turmoil in the eurozone and division among European leaders, it was the IMF, under Strauss-Kahn’s leadership, that kept the eurozone’s rescue strategy on track.

    The Financial Times said that the IMF’s single most important influence in the resolution of the eurozone crisis was political — amid a lack of political leadership, the paper said, the IMF filled a vacuum.
    (IMF Chief’s Arrest Renews Euro Debt Crisis Fears, NPR)

    “Ah-ha! So Strauss-Kahn wasn’t on board with the IMF’s shock doctrine prescription. In fact, he was opposed to it. So there were voices for sanity within the IMF, they just didn’t prevail in the policy debate.

    But why would that be, after all, Strauss-Kahn was the IMF’s Managing Director, his views should have carried greater weight than anyone else’s, right?

    Right. Except DSK got the ax for a sexual encounter at New York’s ritzy Sofitel Hotel. So the changes he had in mind never took place, which means that the distribution of wealth continued to flow upwards just like the moneybags constituents of the IMF had hoped for.

    Funny how that works, isn’t it? Funny how it’s always the Elliot Spitzers, and the Scott Ritters, and the Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s who get nailed for their dalliances, but the big Wall Street guys never get caught.
    Why is that?

    The fact is, Strauss-Kahn was off the reservation and no longer supported the policies that the establishment elites who run the IMF wanted to see implemented. They felt threatened by DSK’s Keynesian approach and wanted to get rid of him. That’s it in a nutshell.

    Do you know why the bigwig plutocrats hated DSK?

    It had nothing to do with his sexual acrobatics at the Sofitel Hotel. Nobody cares about that shite. What they were worried about were his plans for the IMF which he laid out in a speech he gave at the Brookings Institution in April 2011, one month before he got the boot. The speech got very little attention at the time, but– for all practical purposes– it was DSK’s swan song. And, I think you’ll see why.”


  7. Christian W

    Thank you, Eric Holder!

  8. Henry

    Sorry Elaine but you have been had! The article in the Daily Currant is satire not a true report. The article seems so true because it is what we expect in this totally corrupt country.

  9. emsnews

    Thanks for the head’s up! He will have a juicy job nonetheless.

  10. vengeur

    OUF! Thank you Henry. I almost posted that elsewhere. You know the thing about it, it seemed SO believable. It’s only the number that is UNbelievable.

  11. Luke

    Meanwhile Whites get a double helping of Guilt courtesy of the Left.

  12. Luke

    ‘t had nothing to do with his sexual acrobatics at the Sofitel Hotel’.
    We only have her word for it and she is a grifter.
    ‘Less than a day after Strauss-Kahn’s arrest, his accuser had a telephone conversation with an incarcerated “high-end, profitable drug dealer,’

  13. vengeur

    Hands up, don’t shoot! We need a reason to burn and to loot!

  14. John

    Christian W

    Funny how it’s always the Elliot Spitzers, and the Scott Ritters, and the Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s who get nailed for their dalliances, but the big Wall Street guys never get caught.
    Why is that?

    Rockefeller. Rothschild. Take your pick.



    Charles Barkley will enter the ranks of the shunned.

    Fortunately, this is not the case. Sir Charles has been sticking his finger in the leftists’ eyes for years now, and never suffers for it. Personally, I think the reason is simple. He refuses to give a damn what anyone thinks about him. When someone gets all butthurt over anything he says, his response is generally, “oh yeah? So prove me wrong.”

    The leftists have figured out that he really isn’t going to be intimidated, and this willingness to stand his ground also means that he has a lot of fans who will tune in if they know he’s going to be on a show. Shunning Barkley means missing out on a payday, and at the end of the day, leftists love money a lot more than “conservatives” do.

    We need a lot more folks like Barkley. And we need ’em yesterday.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s