Latest ‘Fashion Cycle’ Is One Of The Ugliest This Last 100 Years

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.34.59 AM

The latest scheme for top notch media creeps is to get attention by wearing see-through clothing.  Some designs are expensive materials and some are really cheap looking but all are looking for cameras to gloat over them and thus, make some money via being obnoxious celebrities.  The other fav item of wear are jeans that have been run over by spiked drums that tear off sections as if this is due to wearing it a lot, not mindless ripping up to appear poor while paying a huge amount for this ‘wear and tear’ garbage.


Above is the ever-desperate to be in the media, Kim Kardashian steals the show at Vogue 100 gala dinner in London | Daily Mail which obliges her in this quest to be seen through.  Except this broad isn’t alone in this quest for the holy grail:

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.35.42 AM

This other lady at the same event demurely covers her titties somewhat and doesn’t flash her brush in public but that is because she probably is too embarrassed to do this…so far.


Rihanna flashes her black thong knickers in a sheer emerald lace dress  | Daily Mail Online

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.39.36 AM

This pop star that has gone to great lengths to look as white as possible also needed attention so badly, she bared her panties in public and let her tits show entirely.


The warmest period in the history of this interglacial was several thousand years ago and this is how the highest levels of Minoan society ladies dressed:

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.53.33 AM

Oh, the hussies!  They had the very best revealing clothing, bar none!  Tits forward and in your face, they gleefully ran around with fancy hairdos and tight corsets and flouncy skirts and when the Minoan Warm Age ended, it ended badly for them all, chased back into cave dwelling despair.


Here is a particularly sad example of what women are doing to themselves these days: Blac Chyna shares Instagram throwback photo when she went by Angela Renée White: years ago, this lady (I use the term loosely here) looked gorgeous, sweet and clean and herself.

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.45.39 AM

Years later and tons of surgery and other cosmetic changes for the worse, is this lady who changed her name so no one would think she was ever a sane, sweet young lady.  She is now a notorious ‘celebrity’ and ugly as hell:

Screen shot 2016-05-27 at 9.45.51 AM

I must say, her white hair wig is interesting in a horrible way.  But the surgical changes to her face making it look like a mindless clown is aped across the celebrity rainbow: they ALL end up looking nearly the same, these sad ladies.  They go to the same surgeons who seem to have just one template and these guys erase any humanity or beauty which depends on looking different and lively leaving these ladies with near-immobile faces.


Who wants sex with a human puppet?  It doesn’t work well for the men, beware!  Women who can’t change facial expressions end up being very self-centered because they can no longer read other’s faces or show emotions honestly.  Very dangerous combination.


In another news story yesterday:  Transgender activist in Pakistan died after hospital staff waited to treat her—they deliberately let her die!  I have a transgender child and this is infuriating news.


sunset borger

side picture begging boneEmail:



209 Greenhollow Rd

Petersburgh, NY 12138

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.


sunset borger


Filed under .money matters

18 responses to “Latest ‘Fashion Cycle’ Is One Of The Ugliest This Last 100 Years

  1. ziff

    LOL , i get a laugh out of D & G adds ,talk about fashion victims ! Men too, [and especially],, if they actually wear this stuff.

  2. Melponeme_k

    I hate looking at fashion photography and celebrity photos now. No one looks human anymore.

    And the minorities (all of them) lighten their skin and die their hair blond. Blac Chyna (only in name) has lighter skin than I do now. It’s depressing and you are right, she looked beautiful beforehand. But I’m sure she had a lot of industry people around her telling her she needed these operations.

  3. CK

    Sluts gonna slut.
    Wouldn’t want to have to take them home to meet the folks.
    Wouldn’t marry them or have oddspring with them ( not a misspelling ).
    Wouldn’t miss them if they were not here.

  4. Ken


    On the topic of transgender people, I looked up the term on the internet and the definition seems kind of vague. The term seem to encompass a lot of behavior, including cross dressers, people with sex change operations, and people who dress and appear to the world as their birth gender, but who “identify” with the opposite sex.

    When you use the term transgender, what meaning are you attaching to it? I notice you refer to your transgender “child”, and not your son or daughter. Presumably this is intentional.

    I am not trying to make any political point with this posting. Just trying to understand.

  5. tio

    Polyethylene terephthalate + embryogenesis = tit-p

  6. ziff

    Fashion serves a usefull function , makes the rich look like idiots.

  7. Jim R

    @tio, it’s bisphenol-a, BPA, that causes tits on boys. Not that you’d want to drink the ingredients of polyethylene terephthalate, but a different thing.

    BPA is this oily goop that is an ingredient in the ‘polycarbonate’ plastics, but it is also used as a plasticizer for other plastics. Vinyl plastic. That smell on new vinyl shower curtains? That’s BPA. By itself, vinyl is hard and inflexible, like those PVC pipes in sewer connections. When BPA is mixed into it, it becomes flexible.

    Civilization is in the middle of a very complicated suicide, and we get to watch 🙂

  8. Jim R

    Correction: according to Wikipedia, the common plasticizer in vinyl is dioctyl phthalate, a different type of oily goop. So maybe I can go back to sniffing shower curtains.

  9. tio

    Thanks Jim,

    I recalled seeing a documentary a long while back about research into the consequences of plastics in our food chain, one of the conclusions was that there appeared to be a link between the cocktail of chems and sexual development in the pre as well as post natal. One of the most common sources being so called PET plastic bottles (esp. in poorer countries), factor in my inebriation with a sloppy googlism and voila! But thanks for the post, it is astonishing what can be achieved even in the parts per billion range. But we do insist in railing against the symptoms never the cause *sigh*.

    I remain hopeful about civilisation. I believe that neoliberalism is a dead ideology, even whilst it takes its most ambitious power grab yet, when it goes away corporatocracy must surely follow. Meanwhile I have a date with oblivion, again. ttfn

  10. Jim R

    Yeah, BPA is used to soften the PET, and also in Polycarbonate.

    The unfortunate thing is that is was used (up until recently) in the linings of steel food cans, and those water bottles that outdoorsy folks use when they are hiking or biking. Also for baby formula bottles. BPA was pretty much everywhere in small quantities (which is all it takes). In Polycarbonate, it is a component of the polymer itself, so the monomer will inevitably be present in the final product.

    I think they’ve quit using it in most food and water related products.

  11. tio

    That was most thoughtful of them, imagine creating an artificial wave of the most historically intriguing humans imaginable, and then shitting on them from a great height. Or worse, using them for political cover. The biomass just farts,

  12. tio

    “it never happened …Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. It didn’t matter …” – Pinter

    I’ll get my coat.

  13. Petruchio

    Yes, and what’s up with the tattoos? Why do women–especially attractive women–feel the need to get their bodies all “tatted up”? Is getting a tattoo of some pithy saying printed on you forearm or on the side of your torso supposed to make you look sexy or desirable? Not in my opinion. Just the opposite in fact. Personally I think a women with a gorgeous body looks perfect with nothing on. I mean no tattoos, of course!!! LOL

  14. Seraphim

    It is a cult of ugliness, consequence of the “reversal of symbols and values” characteristic of the ‘subversion’ represented by ‘modern society’.

  15. tio

    This comparison from another web site, cultural glyphosate if you will.

  16. Jim R

    Ahh, this is a better place to put it. The bizarre “opening ceremony” for the Gotthard Tunnel in Switzerland:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s