The New York Times scolding us about how we must have more Muslims, hilarious coming from a Zionist operation!
The Democrats have doubled down on the idea that we should have open borders even as terrorists continue to proliferate and declare war on us and Hispanics demand the right to take away citizen’s jobs but that is OK with the DNC which hopes to have power based on two populations: blacks on welfare and Hispanics who come here illegally. So courts that are ‘liberal’ are striking down any laws to prevent voting fraud or stop illegals from stealing US citizen’s jobs.
Texas voter ID law discriminates against minorities, court rules and Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down North Carolina Voter ID Requirement – The New York Times supports this because it is the Path to Power for the Bilderberg gang. Diluting citizen’s voting power is one way to control events as we see in Europe…oh, it is backfiring there!
The main problem for liberals is to motivate blacks and other minorities to vote which is why they can win national Presidential elections but lose very badly in Congressional election years: Obama Administration Enabling Noncitizen Voting; DOJ Conflict of Interest
So when Arizona sought to include citizenship-verification requirements with voter-registration forms, the institutional Left — including the League of Women Voters, People for the American Way, Common Cause, Project Vote, and Chicanos for La Causa — brought a lawsuit claiming that the EAC hadn’t approved such requirements. Incredibly, this fight over whether states can ensure that only citizens are voting went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2013 in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, a divided Court said that Arizona could not implement such a requirement unless and until the EAC agreed to change the instructions for use of the federal form to include the Arizona requirements.
However, the majority opinion in that case, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, stipulated that if the EAC refused Arizona’s request to accommodate the proof-of-citizenship requirement, the state could sue the EAC and establish in court that “a mere oath will not suffice to effectuate its citizenship requirement and that the EAC is therefore under a nondiscretionary duty to include Arizona’s concrete evidence requirement on the Federal Form.”…
Arizona asked, and a single bureaucrat at the EAC named Alice Miller, who was not an EAC commissioner, but only the acting executive director, denied the request. It’s not even clear that Miller had the right to make this — or any other — decision. At the time, a quorum did not exist on the bipartisan, four-member independent commission.
And that decision is starting to look even more suspect. It seems that Miller may not have been the one who actually made the decision after all. Sources inside the Justice Department tell me that, in fact, it was partisan, left-wing lawyers in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department who actually drafted the denial letter. This is significant for several reasons.
First, the EAC is supposed to be an independent federal agency. While the president is empowered to nominate commissioners for the two Democratic and two Republican commission slots, in practice the president consults with the majority leader of the Senate (Mitch McConnell) and the speaker of the House of Representatives (Paul Ryan), as well as the leaders of the minority party in both houses, to pick the nominees. Because the EAC deals with federal election administration, the legislation establishing the agency — the 2002 Help America Vote Act — was designed so as to provide the EAC with political balance and to be outside the president’s control.
Allowing lawyers for the highly partisan Voting Section to write agency policy obliterates all semblance of independence and bipartisan balance.
Allowing lawyers for the highly partisan Voting Section to write agency policy obliterates all semblance of independence and bipartisan balance. The Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division has become one of the most controversial and ideological components in the entire U.S. government. It is the same cadre of lawyers that dismissed a voter-intimidation charge against members of the New Black Panther Party who physically threatened voters in Philadelphia to help President Barack Obama get elected in 2008; that has waged a war on voter ID and other election-integrity measures; and that has refused to enforce the Voting Rights Act in a race-neutral manner as called for by the plain text of the statute.
The top headline at the Washington Post isn’t about how yes, even Muslim soldiers die fighting Muslims for the US Zionists (very, very ironic for the DNC to pull that rabbit out of a hat!) we learn that Muslim women wearing tight outfits that would have them be beaten to death or arrested at home, are wonderful because they can be athletes, too!
Except if they are not the tip top 1%, of course. Imagine all those young Saudi girls going out in public, doing various athletic things, say, jogging. They would all be killed in no time flat. This is exactly why my mother stormed out of Saudi Arabia years ago when the religious police ran over a lady she knew and killed her because she was riding a bike while not completely covered in black swaths of cloth!
So, the Muslim radicals in Europe and the US who are demanding women cover up are not so terrible because they are finding ways of making stuff that covers up women but is ‘breathable’. Oh, how wonderful of them!
On to Google News: all our media is now united in attacking Trump nonstop. So Google has ‘election news’ that is utterly biased and indeed, false headlines and features mainly that online rag, Huffington Post, no less:
You would imagine that the big story here, Donald Trump mocks Bill Clinton as video shows him ‘SLEEPING’ during Hillary’s speech which the underbelly of the web is chattering about, not how great a speech she gave. It was a real snoozer except her voice has this grating quality that makes it hard for the rest of us to get a good snooze.
Her husband, on the other hand, has blocked it out for years, he is a pro. Normally, Google tries to show ‘trending news’ and ‘inspiring speech’ isn’t trending except for the propaganda machines that are now working so hard, the ball bearings are burning up and it just might crash.
Chloe Moretz and Brooklyn Beckham partied to celebrate Hillary Clinton…as Snoop Dogg rapped ‘F*** Donald Trump!’| Daily Mail Online
He tied the compliment to a performance of Ben E. King’s ‘Stand by Me,’ after going through his own hits like ‘Gin and Juice’ and ‘Young, Wild, & Free.’
‘I forgot, this is the Democrats, they know how to party like a motherf—–,’ he said at another point.
When he played his hit ‘Beautiful,’ Snoop gave a salute to Clinton, who joked Friday about how late she was up – though she did not attend the show.
‘Hillary Clinton, we love you baby This one’s for you,’ he said.
It appears that it is OK for Democrats who support Clinton to cuss, threaten or be obscene because they are ‘black entertainers’. I see news every day of various teachers, police, professors, government workers, etc. being fired for tweeting or saying similar stuff while blacks can spew whatever they wish and nothing happens to them.
That is, free speech has vanished. If you say the wrong thing the wrong way, you are instantly punished to the highest degree. The deterioration in behavior and speech going on in our cities is directly tied to this crushing of saying even the slightest wrong thing that irritates liberals, this dual process of hyper-vigilance of what you say if you are white and total disgusting obscene speech is protected if you are black has a very nasty ending.
From the letters to the editor of the Daily Mail:
Lyn, USA, 4 minutes ago: Keep it classy, Democrats. I would love to see what the reaction would be if the other side had a rapper saying that about Hillary.
Suspected Killer in Custody After San Diego Police Officer Fatally Shot several hours ago. Shot by a Hispanic male. The mayor of San Diego let Hispanics especially illegal ones, attack people coming to a Trump rally, this riot was allowed and Trump voters were intimidated and beaten up which is a violation of their basic civil rights, imagine of a bunch of white thugs did that to Hillary supporters at a rally?
17 responses to “Liberals Want Illegal Aliens To Vote, Want Open Borders”
Do these nasty Jews have a suicide gene? Check Barbara Specters talk on jew tube.
Speaking of (()) how many (()) will Hillary appoint to the Supreme Cour
From the top photo, why is it the Muslim men tend to dress like it’s the 21st century, in a suit and tie, and the muslim women always have to dress like it’s the year 710? To me, it looks like they are wearing slave chains on their heads.
Here’s another photo. Obama gets to wear a suit, Hillary dresses like a slave:
If she gets elected president, who in all the Crapistan countries is going to respect a slave?
And just for fun, here’s Michelle Obama in her slave gear:
While liberals are bending over backwards to show how “open minded” they are in welcoming our new Muslim “friends”, they would do well to heed the fact that Muslims don’t generally feel strongly about civil rights for women. Huge strides that have been fought for and won by women in Western countries don’t exist in most of what is left of the Middle East.
They also don’t look to kindly upon gays, but look the other way when it comes to pedophilia, esp. with young boys. But hey, all cultures are equal, right? Michelle doesn’t look too happy in her Muslim garb, poor thing. 😦
The liberals hate the Westboro baptist church with a passion, a hate I tend to agree with them on. How dare those nuts protest with their signs. Yet they embrace Islam, a religion that doesn’t hold protests against gays or feminists, their religion encourages them to kill gays and feminists instead. An action a 1000X worse than protests, but yet it’s OK because it isn’t done by a western religion.
And modern liberals are so woefully historically illiterate. They don’t know about anything that happened before last Tuesday, except for the crusades and the killing of native Americans. There’s a valid reason our ancestors fought so hard to keep the Muslims out of Europe. But these people think the Ottoman Empire has something to do with footstools and the Siege of Vienna involves little canned sausages.
But these people think the Ottoman Empire has something to do with footstools and the Siege of Vienna involves little canned sausages.
Good one, Lisa! 😀
90% of Americans have no idea what the Siege of Vienna was all about nor how the Ottoman empire’s conquest of Christian lands from Hungary to Turkey is causing mayhem even today especially now, indeed, remember Kosovo, anyone?
I remember Kosovo! Still chaos there, religious ethnic battles! Every day, something bad happens over in that region in all the tiny micro states that popped up since the Iron Curtain fell.
Kosovo was created by Clinton and the Pentagon.
Yup and before that we had the same stuff from Bush Sr. too, didn’t we? This has been going on and on and on and on and our media giants want more of this to eternity, it appears.
They pray US public can’t remember anything much and are easily lied to and will accept all propaganda at face value.
Not that there weren’t always religious battles, but the CIA has been aggravating and irritating them since the Iran coup in 1953. Back then, they installed a dictator against the wishes of Iranian voters.
Since that time, they have depended on ethnic, religious, racial, and political differences, usually arming and supporting a minority side to create the maximum chaos. It’s how “Pax Americana” worked for so many decades without the need to actually send troops most places.
Kosovo is just one of the latest interventions. Note that Yugoslavia was broken up, while they are trying to “maintain integrity” in the Ukraine.
I think they’ll probably try to break up Syria to create an “independent” Kurdistan (or pipelineistan). The “radical islamist terrorist” gambit is sort of running out of steam now.
They’ll inflict the radicals on Europe instead.
@Lisa and e sutton,
And let’s not get started about the Diet of Wurms!
Yes, the Diet of Wurms…great for joke telling even in German.
I grew up knowing this information due to my father being a Lutheran German.
meanwhile, backlash over ‘Black Lives’—-
And now, this. [‘All Lives Matter’ Gets Texas Student Suspended, Sent To Diversity Workshop, Daily Caller, July 31, 2016]:
A student government leader at the University of Houston was suspended for 50 days and ordered to attend a diversity seminar after she criticized the Black Lives Matter movement online.
Shortly after the July 7 shooting in Dallas that killed five officers, Rohini Sethi went on Facebook and opined “Forget #BlackLivesMatter; more like AllLivesMatter.” The statement was later deleted, but only after numerous UH students denounced it as incredibly offensive or even hateful.
“Just for her to say, ‘forget Black Lives Matter,’ is a punch in the stomach,” student Nala Hughes told a local press outlet at the time.
Sethi serves as the vice president of UH’s student government association (SGA), and several UH students demanded her immediate removal.
A full removal of Sethi has significant hurdles, though. The student government constitution requires the student body president, president of the student senate and three-fourths of present student senators to approve impeachment proceedings. Sethi would then be tried by the student supreme court. (RELATED: U-Houston Faculty Told To Avoid Sensitive Topics To Keep Students From Shooting Them)
Instead of going through that arduous process, the student senate approved a measure giving SGA president Shane Smith exceptional one-time powers to punish Sethi as he saw fit. In response, Smith released a letter Friday outlining a set of five punishments for Sethi. The punishments include:
A 50-day suspension from SGA starting August 1. This suspension will be unpaid (she currently receives a stipend of about $700 a month).
A requirement to attend a three-day diversity workshop in mid-August.
A requirement to attend three “UH cultural events” each month from September through March, excluding December.
An order to write a “letter of reflection” about how her harmful actions have impacted SGA and the UH student body
An order to put on a public presentation Sept. 28 detailing “the knowledge she has gained about cultural issues facing our society.”
If Sethi refuses or fails any of the requirements, she will be kicked out of SGA entirely.
Smith notes in his letter that the punishment was particularly harsh because, in his view, Sethi hadn’t recognized the severity of her offense in declaring that all people’s lives matter.
From this point forward, we’ll update this section with the list of people who are either fired, fined, or sent to racial consciousness rehab (diversity training) for daring to criticize Black Lives Matter or black criminality… or, in the case of Dallas Weatherman Bob Goosmann, simply pointing out a black person is a thug for trying to kill a white police officer. [via Sbpdl]
WOW. Insane. So, as a hunter myself and armed to the teeth, can I kill people for my own basic reasons so long as they aren’t ‘black’ and then defining what ‘black’ is, another problem, no?
This is all so insane and stupid. I hope the young lady tells them all to go to hell. I worked as a stripper to get through school and I recommend it highly, pays really well. And you can keep your morals and head up, too.
Nowadays, strippers do more than strip.