The lying bastards who write for the Washington Post today attack Trump’s illegal alien speech, claiming falsely that he is a liar when he isn’t lying at all, they are just quibbling with him over statistics which our government makes deliberately fuzzy. Evidently, the WP is all for illegal aliens invading and stealing jobs that citizens used to do. Working under the table, the employers make more loot and things are definitely cheaper but it destroys society and causes crime to worsen and is very dangerous in many other obvious ways but our rulers don’t care, they want cheap labor.
And today, Trump is suing the Daily Mail Online for lying about his wife, claiming she was a prostitute and sex worker when this is completely false. He is going to be super rich when he is done with his court cases.
Trump cites federal data, saying there are at least 2 million criminal aliens in the country. This number comes from a Department of Homeland Security fiscal 2013 report saying there were 1.9 million “removable criminal aliens.”
But this figure refers to a broader population of non-U.S. citizens with criminal convictions. It includes undocumented immigrants and people who are lawful permanent residents, or those who have temporary visas. Lawfully present people in the United States who are convicted of serious crimes are subject to removal from the country.
So…Trump is correct. Only thing is, legal and illegal aliens, there are at least 2 million of these. Got it. We let in people and legalize them and then they commit felony crimes. Um…so Trump is right. Look, I was deported from Germany for making a speech! These people are supposed to be deported for committing much more serious crimes.
And what is this garbage, calling illegal aliens ‘undocumented immigrants’? Eh? Oh, the word ‘illegal’ is no PC for the traitors who run the WP and who think that genetic screening of everyone going to Israel is OK and that Nazi-level treatment of natives and outsiders in Palestine is perfectly legal.
Trump says 300,000 criminal aliens were released by ICE since 2013, and they were not detained or processed for deportation. This figure lacks a lot of context. ICE has provided its estimates for released criminal convictions to the House Judiciary Committee. Between fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2015, there were 82,288 criminal aliens that ICE released into non-custodial settings.
Vaughan added an additional 200,000 based on her calculation of the number of people ICE released per prosecutorial discretion guidelines. Most of these encounters were in jails, of people who were arrested and were identified by ICE as a “criminal threat.” Once ICE decides not to pursue deportation, the local law enforcement would release them from jail. They are not technically classified as the same “criminal alien” definition by ICE at that point.
Then she added an additional 18,646 “deportable aliens that ICE was seeking” but were ignored by state and local law enforcement. That adds up to just over 300,000.
Evidently, if a legal or illegal immigration family has members arrested, the family stays and in addition, to ‘not break up families’ the criminals get to stay, too. And the result is rising crime. Thank you, law and order guys! Hillary’s solution is more of this.
There are people ICE must release, based on orders from an immigration judge. Federal courts and the Supreme Court have requirements dating to 2001 that limit how long ICE can detain people who are ordered to be removed.
And this, when we had 9/11 and were told, aliens attacked this US after coming in pretending to be students and we would tighten up things so a flood of hostile aliens can’t come here and…then all was dropped and we are back to letting in millions of illegal aliens and no one lifts a finger.
Of the 82,288 released criminal aliens reported by ICE, 56 percent (46,422) were released based on discretion. An additional 38 percent (31,314) paid bond. The rest were released under legal requirements or because they couldn’t get travel documents to leave the country. So not all are because of Obama administration decisions.
Trump also proposed to “issue detainers for illegal immigrants who are arrested for any crime whatsoever, and they will be placed into immediate removal proceedings if we even have to do that.”
So, the entire system let illegal aliens who commit crimes to stay here and it wasn’t just the DNC. The DNC supports this! The DNC wants this! The DNC never talks about how they are keeping alien criminals running lose here because of pandering to the minority voters who want to be the majority eventually.
Under Trump’s proposal, a person arrested by police — regardless of how serious the crime is, without knowing whether they are present illegally — would be held in jail, and their removal proceeding would begin without due process. Such an approach to enforcement is consistent with Trump’s call to bring back two DHS enforcement programs that rely on local governments, which are being phased out because they didn’t effectively target violent criminals, and opened up the potential of racial profiling.
“This is going to be a real problem,” said Marie Provide, an Arizona State University professor who co-authored a book on local police and immigration enforcement, “Policing Immigrants.” She said Trump’s proposal would overwhelm local law enforcement and federal immigration courts, without effectively targeting people who committed serious crimes.
One: illegal aliens drive down wages, hiring them has many benefits for capitalists so they want more illegal aliens and won’t hire citizens.
Two: if we have a crisis of millions of illegal aliens taking US citizen jobs and committing crimes, then we have to spend money to stop this. Letting this run on and on and on is fatal. There is plenty of money going to aliens on welfare. I was once deported, they can be deported too.
The WP publishes lies so frequently, one would think lies are flies around a rotting corpse. The WP gave Trump two ‘Pinocchios’ for ‘lying’ when the WP was quibbling over slight different opinions about statistics. This earns the WP ten ‘Pinocchios’. And the entire editorial board, all Bilderberg gangsters, every one of them, has this to say today: Trump affirms his illogical, un-American immigration plan. Dang! Stopping illegal aliens and deporting them is good for ‘America’.
War criminal Krauthammer hammers away at Trump, screeching, The only immigration solution is to legalize everyone. Well, this was done before. Everyone cheered as Reagan and Bush did this very thing…they promised, hand on hearts, to not let in 11 million illegal aliens and then…did exactly that. So legalizing everyone is not the solution. Krauthammer claims he, a Zionist who loves huge walls in Israel, will build walls to keep the aliens out. He won’t, of course.
The GOP leaders won’t, they will complain about the cost. The DNC needs illegal aliens to gain power so they won’t. The super rich won’t want to pay a tax for this since they, above all, want illegal aliens for labor purposes.
How Trump charms wealthy donors in private by seeking their advice the Washington Post whines. Um, Hillary better release all her private speeches she and her clown husband gave to Wall Street and foreign dictators!
Barack Obama is now alone in Washington claims this WP lackey on the editorial page, too. HAHAHA. Obama is in Hawaii, not DC. He doesn’t give a damn about DC which is why it is a crime magnet.
Now for character assassination by the media: The Daily News in NYC is up there, should be sued:
Zero proof. Nada, nothing. Absolutely nothing. Since this is ‘hearsay’ and it is smearing a young man at the time who said nothing, it is definitely an attack on a man’s character that is illegal. The Daily News editors are committing a crime here. I hope the paper is destroyed by this. Lying this rampant is illegal not to mention, amoral.
In their anxiety to attack Trump, some people have definitely crossed the line. Melania Trump: A retraction | Daily Mail Online has to retract another here-say fake story about Trump’s wife that made her look like a whore. I am betting he is suing them which is why they published this retraction! And I hope he wins and gets a lot of money from these clowns.
On August 20, 2016, an article was published in the Daily Mail newspaper titled ‘Racy photos, and troubling questions about his wife’s past that could derail Trump.’
The article discussed whether allegations being made about Melania Trump could negatively affect her husband Donald Trump’s presidential bid. Among other things, the article noted that allegations have been made in a book available on Amazon about a modeling agency where Mrs. Trump worked in Milan being ‘something like a gentleman’s club,’ and an article published by Suzy, a Slovenian magazine, alleged that Mrs. Trump’s modeling agency in New York, run by Paolo Zampolli, ‘operated as an escort agency for wealthy clients.’
The article, which was also published online by the Mailonline/DailyMail.com website under the headline ‘Naked photoshoots, and troubling questions about visas that won’t go away: The VERY racy past of Donald Trump’s Slovenian wife’ did not intend to state or suggest that these allegations are true, nor did it intend to state or suggest that Mrs. Trump ever worked as an ‘escort’ or in the ‘sex business.’
I mentioned this stupid story. Well, the paper had the bonzo headline and then deep in the story, they said there was no proof so, oh well. Sucks to be Mrs. Trump!
To the contrary, The Daily Mail newspaper article stated that there was no support for the allegations, and it provided adamant denials from Mrs. Trump’s spokesperson and from Mr. Zampolli.
The point of the article was that these allegations could impact the U.S. presidential election even if they are untrue.
HAHAHA. So the POINT of the article is, the allegations are false!!! Too bad for the Daily Mail, their HEADLINE said the exact opposite. So they are still in very hot water here for lying about and defaming an innocent woman. The news of 99% of their article was not that it was false, the HOPE was that it would impact the election due to readers seeing mainly the headline and the top half of the story.
Mrs. Trump’s counsel in the U.S. and the U.K., have stated unequivocally that the allegations about the modeling agencies are false.
Hint to the paper: you are talking to lawyers now and the paper is published online in the US so you will be sued here as well as in London.
To the extent that anything in the Daily Mail’s article was interpreted as stating or suggesting that Mrs. Trump worked as an ‘escort’ or in the ‘sex business,’ that she had a ‘composite or presentation card for the sex business,’ or that either of the modeling agencies referenced in the article were engaged in these businesses, it is hereby retracted, and the Daily Mail newspaper regrets any such misinterpretation.
Too late, dudes. You stepped in do-do and slept with fleas and now you all will have to pay a couple dozen million to clean up this mess you all made.
The Daily Mail newspaper and MailOnline/DailyMail.com have entirely separate editors and journalistic teams. In so far as MailOnline/DailyMail.com published the same article it wholeheartedly also retracts the above and also regrets any such misinterpretation.
HAHAHA…claiming they are separate entities won’t save them from this mess they are in. They will be sued and whatever money Trump spent running for President he will make back, suing the media for attacking his family in order to defame them and smear them to hurt him. I hope I get jury duty for this trial.
209 Greenhollow Rd
Petersburgh, NY 12138
Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’
Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.