WikiLeaks – Hillary Clinton Email Archive: this site has many interesting things on it but look at our election coverage:
On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.
So, the sleazy New York Times has a huge top story about Trump talking dirty about sexy females who flocked to him looking, begging for attention! OH THE HUMANITY! How horrible. We should all assail him with our umbrellas while shouting, ‘Fashion designers love nearly naked young ladies and the NYT loves this, too and publishes pictures of these hussies while Republican males slaver over these dirty pictures!’ No? HAHAHA. The NYT is very dirty when it come to sex and celebrates wild sex and wants more wild sex but suddenly goes all Victorian when…a man wants sex with women.
Ooops. It is OK to be a sex fiend if you are not a man wanting sex with young ladies, these pesky males who want women are pure evil. Back to reality land: Hillary Clinton’s Wall St speeches published by Wikileaks – BBC News
In one of the extracts, Mrs Clinton told bankers that they were best-placed to help reform the US financial sector.
She also said she favoured “open trade and open borders”. Mrs Clinton’s main opponent, Donald Trump, has said he wants to renegotiate key trade deals.
Mrs Clinton had refused to publish the transcripts, from 2013 and 2014. Her rival in the Democratic primaries, Bernie Sanders, had repeatedly called on her to release the text of her speeches, which are thought to have earned her about $26m (£21m).
She was given a mountain of bribes to say she would SECRETLY impose this on all of us after running openly on the exact opposite. So, America, what do you want? A man who lusts for females as is normal for male primates? Or a woman accepting bribes, lying about her true intentions, and imposing things on us that hurt us economically when she makes secret deals with foreign powers? The answer here is obvious: Hillary is a menace to AMERICA.
Trump lusting for females menaces nearly no one. He doesn’t lust after me, that is certain! He hates me because I win whenever I gamble against him. But Hillary hates me for existing as a human being. She wants to force me to do things I don’t want to do. A huge difference. And she is a Bilderberg gangster. Since few Americans ever heard of this gang, and have no idea what this gang does overseas, or its goals, they shrug this off but I keep hammering on this issue since it is the #1 issue here.
From Britain, the land of ‘oh, sex, I’m going to faint!’ Victorian idealism. HAHAHA…yup. Sex is evil incarnate.
Meanwhile, nearly totally ignored by Brit as well as US media, WikiLeaks releases excerpts from Clinton’s Wall Street speeches did make the Daily News in Manhattan. I am stunned. Wow. Some media truth telling! Amazing.
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s private speeches to Wall Street bankers could be seen for the first time Friday, according to WikiLeaks.
A staff member for her campaign said in an email to top officials obtained by the hacktivist group that excerpts from the lucrative speeches showed “a lot of policy positions that we should give an extra scrub with policy.”
Clinton said in one May 2013 speech to a Brazilian bank that her “dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders,” according to the email. She believes that in politics “you need both a public and a private position,” she told the National Multifamily Housing Council in April of that year.
She also told Goldman Sachs and BlackRock executives in February 2014 that she and Bill Clinton are “kind of far removed” from the middle class, the email said. Each highlight from her speeches included a headline noting why the staffer thought her remarks were problematic.
All this is expected. I had a very good idea of what her ‘speeches’ were to Wall Street. I know Wall Street, I lived not very far, just two subway stations, from Wall Street and I went there often and knew traders there in the past. Non of this surprises me even slightly. The thing that amused me most about the seedy Clintons was their desperation in hiding all this from the public. They still won’t admit their involvement in Bilderberg plots to overthrow our government and loot America.
Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.
In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.
As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.
When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.
Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).
In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”
What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.
Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.
The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.
In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”
More New York Times front page sex fiend fun, oh, and blaming Putin for all this mess:
The media made fun of Assange the other day when he showed some weakness in light of him, a true liberal, being queasy about releasing Hillary stuff when it looks like Trump might win because of all this, but after being called names and mocked and pushed around, he relented and released all this junk finally. I am certain we will see more sex stuff about Trump and ignore sex stuff about the Clinton’s little dirty world of hoo-hah fun (NOT with each other, of course).
So we will go through the entire infantile election process with our media giants ignoring issue and snooping in panties of pretty lasses to discover who has sex with whom except when we don’t see who is doing this, of course. Fun, fun, fun.
209 Greenhollow Rd
Petersburgh, NY 12138
Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’
Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.