New York Times Admits They Blew It On Trump, Vows To ‘Rededicate’ Paper To Reporting Honestly – Fox Nation sneers at the NYT. Today, just one day beyond the promise to report the ‘truth’ the NYT goes off its rocker and makes a fashion story that borders on…now, is so deeply insane, it nearly caused me to laugh to death. Curse you all, super-duper fashionistas at the NYT! You nearly killed me!
The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.
Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the paper’s embattled publisher, appealed to Times readers for their continued support.
“We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers,” the letter states.
The massive gulf between reality and truth and NYT reporting is wider than the Grand Canyon and deeper than the deepest pits of hell. I cannot imagine a more ‘widdershins’ backwards world as the NYT reports here today. Will anyone believe the NYT fashion story that is so off the rails, so insane as this obvious mess? HAHAHA. Liberals in NYC will! This shows utter contempt for reality.
New York Times: We blew it on Trump | New York Post reported on the apology of the NYT which claims they want more honest reporting:
“After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters?”
While insisting his staff had “reported on both candidates fairly,” he also vowed that the paper would “rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor.”
Ah, there’s the rub. Had the paper actually been fair to both candidates, it wouldn’t need to rededicate itself to honest reporting. And it wouldn’t have been totally blindsided by Trump’s victory.
His delusions are obvious: at no point in time did anyone at the NYT fairly report anything. This includes their lying about Sanders, too. They were so fake, unreliable, outright lying bastards, they openly defied anyone to stop them from turning the NYT into Pravda on the Hudson and it is the twin tower to the Pravda on the Potomac. Both utterly failed to report the truth about anything at any time including studiously either ignoring or making up stupid stuff about all the Wikileaks documents.
The New York Times even had an article that said the Podesta emails showed that Hillary is honest and smart! Huh? HAHAHA. Such charming lies, openly told with wide innocent eyes! Well, just one lousy day after ‘apologizing’ for lying, the NYT published one of the stupidest, most openly insane lies of all. That is, Hillary, as we see in her top picture, is the icon of fashion designers and Melania is ugly!
On Wednesday, when Hillary Clinton stood in the New Yorker Hotel for her farewell speech, she did so in one of her signature Ralph Lauren pantsuits. Dark gray, with purple lapels and a matching purple shirt (and a matching purple tie for Bill Clinton), it underscored, as so many of her fashion choices did in the run-up to the election, a point: the way two colors/factions — red and blue — can unite to make something new.
But it also symbolized, perhaps, the end of what might have been an extraordinary relationship. And possibly the end of fashion’s seat at the power table.
More than any other industry, fashion had pledged its troth to Mrs. Clinton. Vogue magazine formally endorsed her, the first time it had taken a public stand in a presidential election. The W magazine editor, Stefano Tonchi, declared his allegiance in an editor’s letter.
Vogue Magazine should buy eye glasses for everyone on their staff and the owner should get her own eyes checked. Huh? HAHAHA…this must be a scheme to make us all laugh to death.
Who Wore It Better: Hillary Clinton Or This Sofa? Hillary Clinton Still Frumpy on the Stump, Even in Giorgio Armani? is a right wing site and at least they still have eyeballs.
On top of that, there is this insane story at the NYT: Melania Trump’s Speech May Not Have Been Original, but Her Dress Was – The New York Times whines that she bought a dress from the same ethnic group she belongs to, how dare a Republican wife do what the DNC clowns praise when their own voter base does this exact same thing, that is, ‘ethnic is good!’
…her choice of convention garb was an interesting one because it suggested strategic planning. Especially given that Ms. Trump bought it herself on Netaporter.com, a campaign spokeswoman told WWD, where it sells for $2,190.
Ms. Ilincic’s story parallels Ms. Trump’s nicely: She was born in Serbia, which, like Ms. Trump’s native Slovenia, was part of Yugoslavia at the time; and like Ms. Trump, she found her way out via a career in fashion. It shadows Ms. Trump’s own American fairy tale.
If Cinderella lived in times where the NYT was reporting on princes, the NYT would declare her step sisters are fashion icons and Cinderella is ugly. Too funny. This is also why Donald Trump blocks press access, in defiance of long standing practices. Who on earth would want such obviously insane people to lurk around him, insulting him and his family? No way. Crazy people like this can be dangerous.
209 Greenhollow Rd
Petersburgh, NY 12138
Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’
Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.