Elizabeth Stephens, UC Santa Cruz SEX Art Professor, Boasts About Her Pornography


#RegressiveNews: 5th of September 2017 – YouTube

This is the final end of ‘art’ as ‘taught’ at Universities.  In liberal California, it has been handed over…this female is the head of the art department there!…to outright pornographers.  This woman nakedly…literally nakedly…parades about doing ‘lesbian art’ that is obvious pornography.  She ‘lessons’ are to teach kids to have ‘planetary clitoris’ by running around naked and literally mastrubating in public.  This, on the taxpayer’s dollar and crushing student loans!

So, this butch makes dirty movies, too.  I used to do real ‘performance art’ whereby I danced in public with 100 yards of silken materials.  It was very beautiful and uplifting.  This creature wants people to join her crawling on the ground, LICKING TREES and smearing stuff over nature while rubbing ‘nature’ all over their dirty naked bodies.  And she is PAID to do this!

 

Chair of Art Department.
Environmental Art, Performance Art, Film and Activism

Elizabeth Stephens is a performance artist, filmmaker, activist and educator. Her work explores themes of queerness, feminism and environmentalism. She is the founding director of the E.A.R.T.H. Lab which explores environmental art, research, theory and happenings. In her artistic work she mainly focuses on Ecosexuality: the art of exploring the Earth as a lover.

 

Here is a more realistic photo of this female (?):

Stephens is creating this new field of research, SexEcology, in collaboration with her life partner and collaborator Annie Sprinkle. Together they are the movers and shakers of the ecosex movement. They are injecting some sexy fun and diversity into the environmental movement through their performances, visual art, writings and filmaking. Their most recent feature films include Goodbye Gauley Mountain: An Ecosexual Love Story and Water Makes Us Wet. Stephens has exhibited visual art, created performance art pieces and screened films nationally and internationally for over 35 yearsost recently she and her collaborator are in Documenta 14.

 

She is a pervert because she is encouraging young people to do stupid things in public.  When I was very young, to make lots and lots of money and thus, go to school after working only a few months at a time, I used to strip for a living.  No sex selling, just stripping.  Was rather popular back then mostly because I made the men feel good about things (being nice, that is).

 

This female here, on the other hand, never lived away from universities which nurtured and protected her as she preyed on fellow students and then younger students who were handed over to her:

 

Education and Training:
Diploma, School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
B.F.A., Tufts University
M.F.A., Rutgers University
Ph.D. Performance Studies, University of California, Davis
Teaching Interests:
Environmental Art, Performance Art, Ars Erotica, Intermedia and Sculpture

Honors and Awards:
Eureka Fellowship, Fleishaker Foundation, San Francisco, CA

Rydell Fellowship, Santa Cruz, CA

San Francisco Arts Commission Cultural Equity Grant, San Francisco, CA

Theater Cash Grant, San Francisco, CA

Email:
estephe@ucsc.edu
Phone:
831-502-7312
Office:
Digital Arts Research Center 341
Studio: Digital Arts Research Center 229
Office Hours:
Email for Office Hours
Mailing Address:
Art Department

Baskin Visual Arts

UC Santa Cruz

1156 High Street

Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Website:estephe@ucsc.edu

http://art.ucsc.edu/faculty/elizabeth-stephenshttp://elizabethstephens.org/

 

Gads!  Men paid me money to strip.  This female (?) men would pay to stay away!  And not take off any clothing!  She would be booed off stage!  But the university system showers her (it?) with money.  Since the left also hates using regular pronouns, I feel filthy calling her a ‘female’ after seeing how she presents herself.

She must have broken Photoshop, doctoring her photos.  And her big book is:

This is just amazing and to think ‘students’ pay through the nose for ‘teachers’ like this blatant sex fiend female…IT…what a farce.  She should be arrested for pretending to be a ‘teacher’.  She is no teacher…she is training young people to be prostitutes or pimps.

16 Comments

Filed under .money matters

16 responses to “Elizabeth Stephens, UC Santa Cruz SEX Art Professor, Boasts About Her Pornography

  1. Shawntoh

    Elaine,

    What type of backlash could we expect from this? I hate think how the right is going to react to this–

    The left continues to go through these cultural convulsions and it’s getting so convoluted as you have indicated over the past few years– where will it end?

  2. Melponeme_k

    That is a man. NOT A WOMAN. You can see it by the broad shoulders which fits 3 head lengths. The thick neck with prominent trachea. If she is a biological female, I would say she experiments with hormones or received a good dose while in utero (Freemartin). The partner she poses with regularly (just do a search) looks questionable too.

    She wouldn’t be a media sensation if she didn’t have a transgender vibe about her.

    I know y’all are laughing at me. But I’m telling everyone, all the “personalities” in the media are transgender. That is the elite thing. Their religion. They think that will get us all closer to their concept of God.

    Find out about Victoria’s Secret! It’s all about the Man Spreading! LOL

  3. Ken

    I have to agree with Mel @#2. If someone had not told me that this was a picture of a woman I would not have been sure.

    I wonder if this is the start of a trend toward adopting the retro look of the late 1960s and early 1970s. As part of the counter-culture of that time many (most?) college age women went out of their way to dress badly, not wear make-up and (often) didn’t bother to bathe regularly. This was a temporary fad, but it resulted in a lot of ungly women when I was in college. The co-eds looked much better when my children attended college. Is it possible that “Elizabeth” only looks like that as part of a contemporary counter-culture fashion?

  4. Vengeur

    LOL. This artist fruit-cake’s “life partner” is none other than porn actress and exhibitionist extraordinaire Annie Sprinkle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Sprinkle

  5. timothy carroll

    @#4

    I say it goes back to Twiggy, Ken. She had no tits, no ass, no hips, and her hair was shorter than most of the guys that sported Beatle cuts back in ‘the sixties. Yet she was the top model of the sixties. Gone were the curvaceous babes like Marilyn Monroe, Jane Russell, Jayne Mansfield, hell, even Janet Leigh. We got women that dressed like gay boys in the ’60s. Pantsuits for everyone. Yay! (Hillary came out of that era, if that makes you any less seasick.) :0

  6. melponeme_k

    @6

    Go deeper into the insanity. None of the women you mentioned as “curvaceous babes” were women at all. I don’t believe we ever have had REAL women (or even for that matter REAL men) in mass media since it began in the 1900s (advent of movies).

    It has always been a thing in the media to invert the sexes.

    Look at their faces and you will see inversion. The mass media women have that hungry, searching, predator look. That is not the look of a woman. The mass media men have a soft, gentle demeanor. That is not the look of a man.

    This is pushed on young children especially in regards to media directed to them. The boy bands are all female. The cheesecake for men are depictions of men. This is messing with our psychosexual development to make us confused about our own sexuality or DISGUSTED with the opposite sex.

    And it has worked! In regards to the disgust factor. On Youtube I see feminist after feminist angry and disgusted with men. On the other side I see man after man in the MGTOW movement absolutely disgusted with women.

    All of them basing the majority of their opinions on the source of their misery…MEDIA.

  7. Shawntoh

    Elaine,

    You forgot to mention that Annie Sprinkle, her partner, is a former PORN star.

    Now I ask you, people, what would you do if your child said to you one day when they were 21 years–

    “Mommy and Daddy, I wanna be a porn star!!!!”

    What would you do? What would you say? Well…?

  8. Lou

    Sprinkle is a (((joooo))). No surprise.

  9. Lou

    SATANIC FASHION SHOW AT CHURCH,

  10. Um, the destruction of ‘art’ began long before the CIA existed. It started not in the US but in Europe, specifically, in France and Russia and Germany after WWI.

  11. Lou

    13–I take it that you dont like Abstract Art?

  12. If a monkey can do it, it isn’t ‘art’ it is ‘natural’. I believe in art as an artifact, a human-made thing. Nature is very beautiful and evolution is amazing and some of the most beautiful things on earth evolved organically but this isn’t ‘art’ it is ‘nature’.

    And I prefer monkey ‘art’ to humans aping monkeys.

  13. Lou

    There is a drawing done by an Elephant [its a nice squiggle] Bill De Kooning [he of the 100 million dollar paintings] said ‘thats one talented elephant.’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s