Way back in 2016, before the election, the IRS began to investigate the Clinton Foundation’s bribery systems. This investigation is mostly invisible to the public because the culture of leaking everything is slowing down in DC. It was obvious to me last year that the Hill and Bill bribery scheme to collect billions in bribes from international or Bilderberg operations and countries was treason. Treason is a serious charge and frankly, I wanted Reagan arrested for treason back when he ran off to Japan to collect his own $2 million bribe. The main tool for bribery since then has been the Reagan 5 minute speech rule: it is OK for rich entities to give millions to our ‘political leaders’ if it is for a ‘speech’ which usually is ‘thanks for the bribe’.
The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.”
The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside the IRS.
Many of these bribery systems are funneled through fake charities that supposedly are to save poor people who seem to never get much of anything from all this ‘fund raising’. Sort of like the Clintons and Haiti: the Clintons collected millions and saved virtually no one in Haiti.
Will IRS investigate Australia’s donations to Clinton Foundation? This story is from Australia. Citizens there are very annoyed that Aussie politicians and Bilderberg members were funneling loot to the Clintons illegally. Now this is finally being investigated.
IRS investigators should dig into the millions of dollars of unresolved reporting disparities on exactly how much money Australian government agencies shoveled into the Clinton Foundation, Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee tells The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Clinton Foundation listings include contributions from the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Agency for International Development in a range between totals of $20 million and $50 million. The foundation does not provide the date of the contributions.
Wow. That is a lot of loot! I asked back in 2016, why was the government of Australia giving money to the Clinton Foundation in order to save Haitians when Australia could do this directly, themselves. They saved not one Haitian child. This was obviously a bribery scheme, not charity.
Even with the highest number — $50 million — in the range, however, there is a disparity of as much as $39 million with reports from the Australian government. Using the foundation’s lowest number of $20 million, the disparity could be as much as $68 million.
$68 million in bribes pales in comparison to what the Saudis and Israelis gave.
The disparity prompted Blackburn, vice-chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, to tell TheDCNF that “reports have shown that the Clinton Foundation has failed to accurately report tens of millions of dollars in foreign government grants, including some while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.”
The Obama corruption was so great, Hillary thought she could solicit bribes openly during his reign. Obama should also be charged. Bribery should be illegal. Reagan should have been arrested when he came back from Japan many years ago and I was very angry that he got away with an open crime. The media told the citizens here, Reagan was so beloved by the people of Japan, they wanted to reward him! Not, ‘See, our one way trade with Japan was launched by Reagan after he was offered bribes.’ Which is treason, by the way.
Snopes Debunked on Claim New York Times Didn’t Collude With Hillary Clinton. The NYT conspired to warp all the news to put bribery queen Clinton into the White House. They also published many lies and slanders to do this. They colluded with Clinton to put out fake news.
Back in October 2016, Snopes attempted to debunk our assertion that the New York Times had colluded with Clinton’s campaign by warning them in advance about potentially negative stories that were about to be published.
The NYT is infamous for colluding with DC people to commit crimes. One recent and totally evil example is Iraq: the illicit war on Iraq was launched by Bush and his Bilderberg gang who issued endless lies about 9/11 and Saddam who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, in order to shove the EU and US population into supporting an illegal invasion.
This is a war crime! The Nüremberg Trials made this crystal clear: lying about international incidents in order to orchestrate an invasion is a war crime! And the US did this. Few people seem aware of the implications of this. Not one war criminal was punished at all, nope. But then, they are the Real Rulers.
An email circulated amongst internal Clinton campaign staffers revealed how, “The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon.”
We responded to the email, which was released as part of Wikileaks’ Podesta email dump, by tweeting, “New York Times warns Hillary campaign in advance of stories they are about to publish.”
The story back then was true: Hillary could deep six any NYT story if she decided it was too negative or would get her in trouble because she breaks laws left and right all the time. The news about this collusion between the NYT Jewish owners and Hillary had to be squelched so the leftists duo running ‘Snopes’ decided to lie about all this. Liars lying about liars! Fun stuff.
Now Snopes has been embarrassed further by the revelation that a New York Times reporter used to email Hillary Clinton’s State Department days in advance to warn them of stories that were about to be published.
Snopes should be called a fake news site. Nearly all of their ‘information’ is totally biased and often false. The mainstream liberal news refuses to alert us about this because the lies that Snopes says are ‘true’ are all liberal lies. This is beyond pathetic. But then, the Real Rulers are now spreading censorship across the internet in desperation, trying to stop the flood of real information we can get, note how they are shutting down access to any information from Russia!
Germany was taken over by the former communists of East Germany and Merkel is their leader. They hate free speech and already in Germany, if you post online anything that irritates ANTIFA and the commies like Merkel, you are arrested and put in prison! Here are the rules for ‘speech’ in Neue Östdeutschland:
(1) Anyone who, in a manner which is likely to disturb public peace,
1. Against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group, against members of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of a group or a part of the population, or to violence or arbitrariness.
At the exact same time one is supposed to not talk about religion or violent radicals attacking religion, we have the Merkel government demanding all traces of Christmas be erased from Germany! The Muslims are also demanding all crosses in public be removed, too and are attacking crosses all across Germany.
Attacks the human dignity of others by cursing or slandering a malicious group, a part of the population or an individual because of their belonging to a designated group or to a part of the population,
Will be punished with imprisonment of three months to five years.
The interesting thing here is, Muslims can now be put in prison for cussing at Christians or attacking them in mosque speeches, all the Immans do this all the time.
(2) A sentence of up to three years’ imprisonment or a fine shall be imposed on anyone who:
1. (Article 11 (3)) or make it available to the public or make available, make available or made accessible to a person under eighteen years of age a document (§ 11 (3)) which:
a) To hatred of a group referred to in paragraph 1 (1), against members of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of a group referred to in paragraph 1 (1) or of a part of the population,
b) To violence or arbitrary measures against persons or persons referred to in subparagraph (a), or
c) Attacks the human dignity of persons or pluralities of persons referred to in letter (a) by abusing, maliciously condemning or slandering them,
Ahem: this again, can be turned against Muslim leaders who do this all the time. Calls to destroy citizens of Europe and replace them with Muslims happen all the time, right? How many have been arrested for this? NO ONE.
(A) to ©, by means of broadcasting or telemedia, of a person under eighteen years of age or of the public, or Third party:
(3) A criminal offense of up to five years or a fine shall be punished by a public offense committed under the rule of national socialism of the kind described in § 6 (1) of the Code of Criminal Law in a manner which is likely to disturb public peace or in a meeting, denies or trivializes.
So even saying, ‘The Muslims are no problem, terrorism doesn’t exist’ is now illegal in Germany? HAHAHA. The Christians better latch onto this law and apply it fully and constantly!
(4) A sentence of up to three years’ imprisonment or a fine shall be imposed on anyone who publicly or in a meeting disrupts public peace in a manner which is detrimental to the dignity of the victims by endorsing, glorifying or justifying the national socialist violence and arbitrariness.
Commies are all national socialists which is why the borders of Cuba, for one glaring example, are closed. Try entering communist China illegally! You would have been shot dead on sight.
(5) Paragraph 2 (1) and (3) shall also apply to a document (Article 11 (3)) of the content referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4. Paragraph 2 (2) also punishes anyone who makes a content referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 accessible by means of radio or telemedia of a person under eighteen years or the public.
(6) In the cases referred to in paragraph 2 (1) and (2), also in conjunction with paragraph 5, the attempt is punishable.
Welcome to the USSR. Russia is free and Germany has been enslaved by communists. The communists hate national socialists, they want ‘international’ socialism like the Mao gang, for example. Except China and East Germany NEVER had anything remotely resembling ‘open borders’ and certainly no humans could enter or leave at will.
I was deported from West Germany in August, 1968 precisely because I gave a speech there at age 17 that I intended to enter East Germany via Czechoslovakia’s fairly open borders which incidentally, was slammed shut by the USSR and East Germany after I gave that speech and locked the doors shut so no one could come and go.
I suppose the East Germans remember me, for I was the pioneer in ‘enter a country and give a political speech while still very much a minor’ because I had adult civil rights at age 16, that is, I had no ‘parental entities’ responsible for me, I was able to even sign contracts back then! I used this heavily to run riot, of course, being a spoiled brat Ruling Elite offspring.
These rules in Germany are going to kill democracy in Europe and they were designed to do this, note that the Bilderberg gang has already begun this by charching Le Pen and others who are in the political arena with ‘hate speech’ crimes! The poor saps voting for this garbage vote for the left in order to get goodies for themselves and so they vote for monsters while whining about what these monsters are doing to them!
The Muslims ran riot in France on the new year. They celebrated their successful invasion by burning cars, attempting to kill cops including beating a female officer nearly to death while screaming ‘Allah Akbar.’ Why isn’t that illegal? Sweden sees this frequently and does nothing! Are they all insane?