2 Google Male White Employees and Prager University Online File Civil Rights Violation Lawsuits Against Google


What Happens When Google Disagrees With You? – YouTube

 

James Damore just filed a class action lawsuit against Google, saying it discriminates against white male conservatives | TechCrunch reports today.  This is a new lawsuit.  Damore is suing on his own plus others are now joining him in a class action lawsuit which carries great import for all businesses and society.  The war on white/Asian males must end.  I broke ground way back in 1977 by becoming a woman who worked in construction…no one would hire me so I was my own boss and this led to success in business.  The new discrimination rules are extremely unfair and unreasonable.  I want Damore to win and I bet this will go to the Supreme Court.

 

James Damore, a former Google engineer who was fired in August after posting a memo to an internal Google message board arguing that women may not be equally represented in tech because they are biologically less capable of engineering, has filed a class action lawsuit against the company in Santa Clara Superior Court in Northern California.

 

His claims: that Google unfairly discriminates against white men whose political views are unpopular with its executives.

 

Damore is joined in the suit by another former Google engineer named David Gudeman, who spent three years with Google working on a query engine. According to Gudeman’s LinkedIn profile, he left the company in December 2016 and has been self-employed since.

 

The lawsuit, filed by Dhillon Law Group, says it aims to represent all employees of Google who’ve been discriminated against due to their “perceived conservative political views by Google,” due to “their male gender by Google” and “due to their Caucasian race by Google.”

 

Hammer all issues all the way.  The Supreme Court is, I believe, going to rule in favor of these two young men and also Prager University.  What will happen though, is Google will settle out of court to prevent this from setting precedent.  I hope the parties do not settle, this is a very important civil rights issue.  I bet Prager will not settle out of court, Mr. Prager is a very determined man who isn’t interested in money, he is the leader of a movement.


YouTube responds to PragerU’s lawsuit – YouTube

The video at the top of this story is by Prager University people who are being attacked by You Tube and they, too, are now suing Google’s SJW policies.  This was last November.  Google denies censoring except when it is ‘necessary’ without explaining how this is being done politically not ‘to keep sex/violence’ from children.

 

There is nothing even remotely ‘obscene’ or ‘violent’ at Prager U videos.  Roadrunner cartoons for children is tremendously violent and it OK with SJW staff in California.  Videos that argue different points of view, on the other hand, when this clashes with SJW Californian’s lunatic beliefs, these are being defunded and censored.

 

All Disney cartoons for children are violent sometimes terrifyingly violent.  The entire reason for censoring stuff falls flat on its face when one considers that small children are tormented by violent Disney shows all the time.

 

Nearly all children’s cartoons are very violent!  Dennis Prager Explains PragerU Lawsuit Against YouTube: ‘If America Looks Good, It’s Restricted’ – YouTube

These lawsuits against You Tube’s leftist policies will be real winners in court.  I hope the punishment runs in the billions to teach all online services a sharp lesson. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that a $120,000 fine against a pair of poor bakers would stand because they refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

 

Denial of services due to political leanings in a ‘public entertainment/information’ platform is exactly the same and it is malicious and totally violates the First Amendment in our Constitution.  All online systems are very public and exactly a ‘public forum/square’ situation and thus, is covered, it is not ‘private’ for they are broadcasters carrying information from all over, not producing their own content.


Why We’re Losing Liberty – YouTube

 

Preserving our right to debate in public is extremely important, the left wing/fake liberals think reducing all platforms for debate is ideal.  They are foolish and don’t understand this will bite them in the rear, very badly.  For no leftist regime on earth has retained freedom of speech.

 

Germany today has no freedom of speech AT ALL.  Write the wrong things online and they arrest you. Ditto ‘liberal’ Sweden: zero freedom of speech.  France: the same.  England has more restrictions than the US and is rapidly aping the German/Swede system of no freedom of speech at all.

 

We are the bastion of free speech!  And to hammer this home, people have to go to court and win cases keeping, not expanding, free speech.

8 Comments

Filed under .money matters

8 responses to “2 Google Male White Employees and Prager University Online File Civil Rights Violation Lawsuits Against Google

  1. KHS71

    The “hierarchy of rights” is in play here. Depending on your identity, the left gives out rights. A women has more rights than a man. Blacks more than whites. A Muslim higher than a Christian. Gays higher than straight. It’s how the left pushes their identity politics. As a white male, I was told I have no civil rights by a black person. When asked why, I was told because I have “white privilege”. Thus I can be discriminated against. How I can have no civil rights but the person next to me can is mind boggling. Remember the Bakke case. If I remember correctly they held that he was discriminated against but that was OK. The end result justifies the means. The left thoroughly believes that discrimination is OK against certain groups as long as the specific groups votes for them and the other group does not. Since white males are probably the last identity group not to vote for Democrats, the attacking is relentless. I feel this is what is behind the continued assault of white, Christian, straight, males. The Democrats wish to have absolute power and the elites control the democrats.

    This will be an interesting case. I hope James Demore wins a sizable amount of money Google.

  2. Lou

    I dont relate to Prager. He has or had a radio show.

    Dennis Prager was born in New York City on August 2, 1948, to Hilda Prager (née Friedfeld; 1919–2009) and her husband, Max Prager (1918–2014). Prager and his siblings were raised as Modern Orthodox Jews. He attended the Yeshiva of Flatbush in Brooklyn, New York.

    There, in the 10th grade, he met Joseph Telushkin. The two became close friends and would later co-author two books. He went on to attend Brooklyn College and graduated with a double major in history and Middle Eastern Studies. Between 1970 and 1972, he attended the Middle East and Russian Institutes (now Harriman Institute) at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs. Prager also studied international history, comparative religion, and Arabic at the University of Leeds./wiki

  3. Lou

    $120,000 fine against a pair of poor bakers would stand because they refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple–is that a good thing?

  4. Oguy

    Lou– IMO an excellent treatment of this issue is provided at the following link (near the bottom of the brief essay), along with a strong foundational argument to support it:

    https://archdruidmirror.blogspot.com/2017/06/a-few-notes-on-burkean-conservatism.html

  5. JSmith

    “Prager University”? Really? I’m sure that’s as intellectually challenging as dear old Trump U. was. How many Nobel laureates are on his faculty? Come to think of it, does he have a “faculty”?
    Elaine, have you seen the Taco Bell commercial featuring The Illuminati? I caught that during a football game and I immediately thought of you.

    Happy New Year, by the way.

  6. ziff

    KHS71, i think you should listen to jordan peterson about the deeper origins of the new left in certain french phllosophers/marxists.

  7. JSmith

    “and totally violates the First Amendment in our Constitution.”
    Um, no. Not even close. Let’s read the First Amendment together, shall we? “Congress shall make no law…” Congress. Not Google. Google is a private company and they can promote or demote any speech they want.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s