DOJ IG releases explosive report that led to firing of ex-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Comey| United States Government | Federal Bureau Of Investigation report: The hunt is now on. The hunters who were seeking to have a ‘soft coup’ after the last election, are now being hunted down by investigators exactly like how this happened during the Nixon election crime spree so many years ago. This time, the loser of the last election is pushing hard for the soft coup which has now totally backfired. James Comey, who is basking in the love of the mainstream media giants petting him, is now on the legal firing line, he will go to prison unless he tells us exactly who orchestrated all of this as if we don’t already really know who…hahaha.
I am going to go through the summary of the legal documents outlining how Comey AND McCabe are in very deep legal trouble and this gang running the FBI broke Federal laws and committed various crimes inside the FBI in order to frame Trump in a fake impeachment based on fake charges of being a Russian agent a la McCarthy…this is a historical moment.
The New York Times had this story yesterday but didn’t report it correctly, as per usual so I will go through this actual document which is now online, and we can discuss how this works and I predict that Comy will cease being on TV all the time in his fake book tour (the book is entirely made up) and will be silenced due to anything he says or does will be held against him including…the present book tour!
Introduction and Summary of Findings
This misconduct report addresses the accuracy of statements made by then-Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to the FBI’s Inspection Division (INSD) and the Department of Justice (Department or DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) concerning the disclosure of certain law enforcement sensitive information to reporter Devlin Barrett that was published online in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on October 30, 2016, in an article entitled “FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe.”
The mainstream media happily reported leaks and charges including utterly false information that poured out of the CIA and FBI like crazy for the last two years.
A print version of the article was published in the WSJ on Monday, October 31, 2016, in an article entitled “FBI, Justice Feud in Clinton Probe.” This investigation was initially opened by INSD to determine whether the information published by the WSJ in the October 30 article was an unauthorized leak and, if so, who was the source of the leak. On August 31, 2017, the OIG opened an investigation of McCabe following INSD’s referral of its matter to the OIG after INSD became concerned that McCabe may have lacked candor when questioned by INSD agents about his role in the disclosure to the WSJ. Shortly before that INSD referral, as part of its ongoing Review of Allegations Regarding Various Actions by the Department and the FBI in Advance of the 2016 Election, the OIG identified FBI text messages by McCabe’s then-Special Counsel (“Special Counsel”) that reflected that she and the then-Assistant Director for Public Affairs (“AD/OPA”) had been in contact with Barrett on October 27 and 28, 2016, and the OIG began to review the involvement of McCabe, Special Counsel, and AD/OPA in the disclosure of information to the WSJ in connection with the October 30 article.
Back during the Nixon hearings, I was confined to my bed due to the delicate condition of my pregnancy, bearing children was highly dangerous for my survival and even deadly so I was stuck in bed, watching the legal parts of Watergate unfold. I also had tons of time to read the papers.
This whole business this last election gave me many flashbacks about that time when Nixon roared to total victory. The hubris was huge. This time around is widdershins: Hillary lost after she was told, she would win as big as Nixon did on his third run for office.
In addition to addressing whether McCabe lacked candor, the OIG’s misconduct investigation addressed whether any FBI or Department of Justice policies were violated in disclosing non-public FBI information to the WSJ.
Just like Watergate, a conspiracy is caught in the gears of legality. The investigation uncovers a massive conspiracy to change an election or remove a President, etc. These investigations always start with uncovering and examining small details, very small details which then open up more details and which end up going to the front door of the Obama White House.
The OIG’s misconduct investigation included reviewing all of the INSD investigative materials as well as numerous additional documents, e-mails, text messages, and OIG interview transcripts. The OIG interviewed numerous witnesses, including McCabe, Special Counsel, former FBI Director James Comey, and others.
As detailed below, we found that in late October 2016, McCabe authorized Special Counsel and AD/OPA to discuss with Barrett issues related to the FBI’s Clinton Foundation investigation (CF Investigation). In particular, McCabe authorized Special Counsel and AD/OPA to disclose to Barrett the contents of a telephone call that had occurred on August 12, 2016, between McCabe and the then-Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (“PADAG”). Among the purposes of the disclosure was to rebut a narrative that had been developing following a story in the WSJ on October 23, 2016, that questioned McCabe’s impartiality in overseeing FBI investigations involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and claimed that McCabe had ordered the termination of the CF Investigation due to Department of Justice pressure. The disclosure to the WSJ effectively confirmed the existence of the CF Investigation, which then-FBI Director Comey had previously refused to do. The account of the August 12 McCabe-PADAG call, and other information regarding the handling of the CF Investigation, was included in the October 30 WSJ article.
The part I highlighted is the key issue here: this coincides with the infamous meeting at the Phoenix, AZ airport between the head of the DOJ and Bill Clinton! The thread of this investigation leads directly to that event.
The head of the Justice Department muscled the FBI to terminate all examination of Clinton corruption or crimes.
We found that, in a conversation with then-Director Comey shortly after the WSJ article was published, McCabe lacked candor when he told Comey, or made statements that led Comey to believe, that McCabe had not authorized the disclosure and did not know who did. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.5 (Lack of Candor – No Oath).
They have now nailed Comey’s feet to the deck and he will now have to sing like a bird if he doesn’t want to find out how the criminal law systems work.
We also found that on May 9, 2017, when questioned under oath by FBI agents from INSD, McCabe lacked candor when he told the agents that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ and did not know who did. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).
Second nail through the foot to the deck.
We further found that on July 28, 2017, when questioned under oath by the OIG in a recorded interview, McCabe lacked candor when he stated: (a) that he was not aware of Special Counsel having been authorized to speak to reporters around October 30 and (b) that, because he was not in Washington, D.C., on October 27 and 28, 2016, he was unable to say where Special Counsel was or what she was doing at that time. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).
Third nail through the foot to the deck…ouch. I remember Watergate, Nixon was furious that the FBI didn’t cover up his crimes. Hillary and her buddy, Obama, were certain that the FBI would conspire to cover up their crimes. Now, McCabe is nailed to the deck, too.
We additionally found that on November 29, 2017, when questioned under oath by the OIG in a recorded interview during which he contradicted his prior statements by acknowledging that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ, McCabe lacked candor when he: (a) stated that he told Comey on October 31, 2016, that he had authorized the disclosure to the WSJ; (b) denied telling INSD agents on May 9 that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ about the PADAG call; and (c) asserted that INSD’s questioning of him on May 9 about the October 30 WSJ article occurred at the end of an unrelated meeting when one of the INSD agents pulled him aside and asked him one or two questions about the article. This conduct violated FBI Offense Code 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).
Fourth nail. Comey is unable to move now. Are there more nails? Looks increasingly like nails in his coffin here. Second nail for McCabe!
Lastly, we determined that as Deputy Director, McCabe was authorized to disclose the existence of the CF Investigation publicly if such a disclosure fell within the “public interest” exception in applicable FBI and DOJ policies generally prohibiting such a disclosure of an ongoing investigation.
An extra nail for McCabe:
However, we concluded that McCabe’s decision to confirm the existence of the CF Investigation through an anonymously sourced quote, recounting the content of a phone call with a senior Department official in a manner designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of Department leadership, was clearly not within the public interest exception. We therefore concluded that McCabe’s disclosure of the existence of an ongoing investigation in this manner violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.
McCabe is in very serious trouble now. Will the mainstream media disclose this important news…HAHAHA. Nope. They will yap and yap around this and not take it seriously but the FBI is now taking this very seriously as is the Department of Justice!
The OIG is issuing this report to the FBI for such action as it deems appropriate.
ARREST THEM ALL!