‘OUTRAGED’ Americans Disgusted With Hyper-Politicized McCain Funeral: this funeral was a parade of Bilderberg gangsters all hollering about how wonderful McCain was, many of whom howled about how evil McCain was when he ran against Obama…this obviously obnoxious Last Wrights (a joke here) was a political witchhunt against Trump. The DNC and half of the GOP are a uniparty: they all go to Bilderberg meetings secretly and they pretend to represent American citizens but really are internationalists who hate democracy and citizen’s rights.
It’s no secret to Americans why the third most unpopular US senator is being hailed as a hero.
He hated Trump.
The childish behavior of Trump’s opponents are backfiring. Instead of nobility, the Bilderberg gang howled and raged and threw tempertantrums, this reminds me of infamous Roman funeral orations…
One lesson in life is, don’t politicise everything. When people act in a kindly, generous way, they earn more love and even opponents warm up, if they slash and burn and rage, then people recoil and people become adamant enemies. It seems that the Bilderberg gang, losing power rapidly, is choosing the ‘attack and defame’ mode. I predict this will backfire in the long run.
Jeff Sessions Backs Asian Students in Harvard Racial Discrimination Lawsuit: this news affects my grandson who is 50% Chinese: He is a smart, cheerful, wonderful child full of curiosity and has loving parents who will do anything to help him learn and grow and…the deck is stacked against him! He as to be twice as good as other ethnic/racial groups. Some kids can coast along and get on the escalator to the top while my grandson will have to climb the hard way up the ladder to success.
“No American should be denied admission to school because of their race. As a recipient of taxpayer dollars, Harvard has a responsibility to conduct its admissions policy without racial discrimination by using meaningful admissions criteria that meet lawful requirements,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote as his department announced its filing on behalf of the U.S. Government.
“Harvard has failed to carry its demanding burden to show that its use of race does not inflict unlawful racial discrimination on Asian Americans,” DOJ’s brief argues. “To the contrary, the record evidence demonstrates that Harvard’s race-based admissions process significantly disadvantages Asian-American applicants compared to applicants of other racial groups—including both white applicants and applicants from other racial minority groups.”
Particularly advantageous for the SFFA’s case were internal Harvard documents showing that the university assigns applicants “personality” scores and was consistently rating well-qualified Asian applicants with poor scores, preventing their admission.
A coalition of mostly race-based Harvard alumni groups describing themselves as “25 Harvard student and alumni organizations comprised of thousands of Asian American, Black, Latinx, Native American, and white Harvard students, alumni (including some who are parents of current Harvard students and prospective applicants), faculty, and alumni interviewers” also filed a brief in opposition to the SFFA’s lawsuit. According to the brief, they “wish to ensure that Harvard provides students with the critically important benefits of diversity and continues to consider race as one of many factors in its holistic admissions process.”
These groups make clear that their primary concern is that not discriminating on the basis of race will benefit white people, who, by the brief’s own statistics are already significantly underrepresented in Harvard’s freshman class (40 percent compared to roughly 62 percent of the American population and 80 percent of Massachusetts by the latest census estimates). “Not only would SFFA’s remedy – eliminating all signs of race from the admissions process – fail to redress the alleged discrimination, it would itself have an acute, foreseeable, and racially discriminatory disparate impact on applicants of color while giving an unjustified boost to white applicants,” the introduction to their arguments reads.
The brief goes on to argue that the SAT and ACT standardized tests are biased in favor whites and that “[e]ven when white students hailed from families with less financial resources than their Black and Latinx classmates, ‘the symbolic capital of whiteness’ relieved them from the hazards faced by their comparatively well-off Black and Latinx peers.”
Note how the racists who now run our schools and our systems that were set up to correct past segregation situations has deteriorated into a class/race game where ‘disadvantaged’ kids who are rich and have all the benefits of wealth, get to be accepted by top schools because they are ‘disadvantaged’ due to mere skin color!
This is insane, cruel and racist. Rich, spoiled black students know they barely have to lift a finger to do any work and will be showered with scholarships and offers from all over the place. This cruel system doesn’t help the ghetto children who go to schools with near zero discipline. Those poor children get to graduate into the prison or welfare systems.
The children being brought in to the top tier schools, on the other hand, are black privileged children who get the magic carpet ride due to invisible ‘discrimination’. Obama is an example of this. The ‘symbolic capital of whiteness’ for males is a curse: they are put in the back of the bus for schools, jobs, everything. Far from getting benefits, they are being systematically crushed.