The above news story is an editorial at the NY Times about how we are all going to roast to death…written by a fake religion professor in Arizona. The left is doubling down on global warming while still calling this fantasy weather stuff ‘climate change.’ It is changing…it is getting colder in key areas that are all where Ice Ages start. Alaska was never ever covered by solid ice whereas nearly all of Canada was, repeatedly.
The Bilderberg gang news media and politicians continue to scream about ‘global warming’, despite increasing cold and ice, that we are going to roast to death unless we tax oil and other energy systems.
The goal is to freeze us all to death, instead. Mother Nature is helping the elites in this program to kill the poor.
“All told, the report says, climate change could slash up to a tenth of gross domestic product by 2100, more than double the losses of the Great Recession a decade ago,” The New York Times reported of the NCA.
Vote in the DNC and you automatically get a big drop in GDP as we see with this recent election.
However, that figure is based on a study funded by groups founded by two major Democratic donors and environmental activists — former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer.
That study only found substantial damage to the U.S. economy under an extreme global warming scenario of 15 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 — twice the United Nations’ worst-case scenario called RCP8.5.
“Even Trump is occasionally right,” tweeted environmental economist Richard Tol in response to Trump’s remarks.
Back to the top link today, the New York Times editorial page features an Arizona Hispanic immigrant from south of the border whining about how hot it is in Phoenix:
N. Ángel Pinillos is a professor of philosophy in the School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies at Arizona State University.
Yes, this is a ‘religious studies’ person and the Pope these days has yet again, yesterday, announced that we are all roasting to death except if one is living in the half of the planet that isn’t warm at all, in that case, the Pope wants us to freeze to death quicker.
According to NASA, at least 97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists think that “climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely caused by human activities.”
This stupid statement clearly shows that this religious teacher has virtually no background in climate debates. That 97% storyline has been debunked repeatedly for the last five years yet the global warmists continue to spout it as ‘truth’.
Today, experts no longer say ‘extremely likely caused’ even if they still believe the planet is warming.
Americans overwhelmingly agree that the federal government needs to take significant action. In a recent poll conducted by Stanford University, ABC News and Resources for the Future, 61 percent of those surveyed said that the federal government should take a great deal or a lot of action to curb global warming. And an additional 19 percent believe that the government should take moderate action.
These polls mean nothing. So, did 60+ voters vote for Hillary and her global warming? Outside of the warmer big cities run by the DNC, people living in the countryside outside of urban warm centers, voted GOP and if you poll them, outside of the southwest corner of the nation, they all say there is little to no global warming.
This is because there has been the opposite of global warming in much of the planet and people living in the countryside see this first.
This is obviously a rigged poll. Or rather, it didn’t poll citizens who vote. If this were so ‘overwhelming’ why did Trump win the election? If most people in warm California think we are roasting to death, this is still a rigged poll that concentrated on the big cities where real climate doesn’t happen.
These are called ‘urban warm zones’ for a reason: even in winter, it is warmer in cities today compared to 100 years ago and thus, all climate data from cities reflects this fact, not ‘global warming’.
As a philosopher, I have nothing to add to the scientific evidence of global warming, but I can tell you how it’s possible to get ourselves to sincerely doubt things, despite abundant evidence to the contrary. I also have suggestions about how to fix this.
The ‘abundant evidence’ that we are roasting to death is pretty invisible where I live. It has been getting steadily colder over the last several years and blizzards are more and more common.
Philosophers have been studying skeptical pressure intensely for the past 50 years. Although there is no consensus about how it arises, a promising idea defended by the philosopher David Lewis is that skeptical pressure cases often involve focusing on the possibility of error. Once we start worrying and ruminating about this possibility, no matter how far-fetched, something in our brains causes us to doubt. The philosopher Jennifer Nagel aptly calls this type of effect “epistemic anxiety.”
This describes ‘global warming’ fanatics to a T. No matter how cold it is, it can be snowing repeatedly in the Sahara Desert, they won’t admit it is getting colder.
To prove us all wrong, they cook the books to make it look as if it is getting warmer via ‘cooling down the past’ in their graphs hoping no one will notice this deception.
Lying about statistics can only go so far. Most people voting for leftists these days are seeking social welfare money, not punitive climate rules. As the poor in Europe are discovering, voting for this means the winners in the elections turn on them and cut off their heating during winter!
A cruel punishment indeed.
The standard response by climate skeptics is a lot like our reaction to skeptical pressure cases. Climate skeptics understand that 97 percent of scientists disagree with them, but they focus on the very tiny fraction of holdouts. As in the lottery case, this focus might be enough to sustain their skepticism. We have seen this pattern before. Anti-vaccine proponents, for example, aware that medical professionals disagree with their position, focus on any bit of fringe research that might say otherwise.
Putting all people who debate ‘science’ in the same boat is fraud. The leftists who want to freeze the poor to death play this mind game thinking we won’t figure this out. It is very hard to ignore super cold weather!
Nature has the whip hand in all this. Telling people to ignore the fact they are freezing to death isn’t going to work very long. Here are today’s weather predictions by the gang running the global warming scam:
THE TWO KILLERS OF THE ARCTIC THAW
‘Frost drought’ occurs when the insulating layer of snow which usually protects plants from the harsh Arctic winter is melted, typically by unusually high winter temperatures.
Excuse me, but this isn’t happening due to warm winter temperatures, it is colder but drier and this is classic for Ice Age conditions. The amount of moisture in the air isn’t dependent upon being very warm, it is a sign of very cold weather.
This is also why the nastiest blizzards happen in late fall or early spring, not January.
If plants remain exposed to cold, windy conditions for long enough, they continually lose water and are unable to replace it from the frozen soil. Eventually, they succumb to drought.
Exactly, this is a cold drought, not a warm drought. Warm droughts happen in summer in Arizona. Cold droughts happen in winter in Ice Age areas.
The second effect is ‘extreme winter warming’ – a sudden burst of high temperatures during winter which melts the snow and tricks evergreen plants into preparing for spring by shedding their cold tolerance.
HAHAHA. They can’t get the propaganda straight! I thought that this elusive ‘warming’ means no snow to melt!!!
When the warm period is over, the return of cold temperatures usually kills the plant.
This entire story is a list of scientific lies. Why didn’t all the Arctic plants die during the recent warm cycle that has now pretty much ended? Hello! This is pure insanity. But it works for the elites right now. France, for example, the elites decided to launch global warming taxes to stop people from burning fossil fuels there. Here are the results:
So, already the riots are spreading across dying Europe. Good. Time is running out for the people there who are expected to pay for their own destruction.
A comment from What’s Up With That? talks about how insane this regime cooked up by the Bilderberg gang is, how suicidal for the citizens in North America and Europe:
England has to wake up and riot. Or they can die at home of extreme cold, I would hope they have enough sense to assail the government properly! But then look at how Europeans greeted invaders for several years!
Now they regret all this. Freezing to death will be a lot quicker. Fixing the energy problems will take a very long time.