I appreciate Peterson’s efforts trying to explain the obvious to oblivious leftists. My own family thinks nothing of my own very dangerous career in construction. The houses everyone lived in were rebuilt extensively and run by me, the person who ‘knows nothing’ about all this. Many women love to pretend they know it all while having very little real life experience. In the EU and US and other ‘first world’ nations, all the dangerous jobs are still falling nearly always upon men, not women. Meanwhile, women claim, falsely, that they are as smart and strong as the strongest and smartest men while providing zero proof of this in any form.
When women compete with men who are disabled or on the lower end of the intelligence scale, these females crow about how ‘strong’ they are. But in real competition, we have ‘women only’ competitions because even a mediocre man can crush most top females in nearly any activity from intelligence or physical strength or speed competitions. Instead of examining why this is so (no examination is necessary, it is pure evolution at work here) universities and politicians and media all work overtime to lie about this matter.
It isn’t a situation of something not being reported, it is an outright conspiracy to lie about basic, logical, biological information so that twisted political policies can be put in place and elites can rule us with an iron fist. When people are delusional, bad things happen. Reality disappears in this mental fog. Already, activists, citing false information about women’s abilities to be as good as top men in any field, to push for women to take over systems they are incapable of running or figuring out.
I picked on chess which requires zero male muscle strength to play to illustrate this delusional thinking of leftists. Leftists sneer at me that females are not interested in chess which is also a fat lie. Many females play chess but not many in the US. In the Middle East and Eurasia and China, women cheerfully play chess and are the top players in the world. No top player is an American.
Meanwhile, ONLY one women player playing today is in the top 100 chess masters. So we have a very clear picture of women being incapable of being better than men in a field where the male testosterone supposedly gives no advantage. It has nothing to do with muscles. Anyone can learn how to play chess. The rules are a lot clearer than with Go which is more ‘zen’ in that all stones are the exact same value and can move the same way.
World Blitz Ch: Carlsen and Artemiev command the standings
by Antonio Pereira
12/29/2018 – Seven wins and four draws left Magnus Carlsen as the co-leader after day one of the World Blitz Championships in Saint Petersburg. The Norwegian is sharing first place with blitz specialist Vladislav Artemiev, who recovered from an early loss to complete the twelve rounds on Saturday with an astounding 9½ score. Two strong performances were also seen in the women’s section, where Kateryna Lagno and Sarasadat Khademalsharieh are sharing the lead on 7½/9.
The top 25 men’s speed chess game rankings start at 2939 and the bottom is 2675. The women’s top score is 2560 and the bottom is 2046. This is quite a few steps below the men’s rankings and the women earn these rankings while playing only women. If they played men all the time, they would be even lower.
So, women competing against women=much lower level games than men playing men. The top 100 regular chess players in the world start at Carlson’s 2835 rank and end at 2652. Only ONE woman is on that list, near the very bottom: Yifan Hou, a fine Chinese woman who has managed to break into the men’s only ranks via masterful playing.
Yet, she plays at women only tournaments instead of struggling along at the bottom of the men’s games and I don’t blame her. Losing too much crushes the spirit. So long as she admits she needs to be in the weaker sex games, I’m OK with this. Pretending women are the same as men? No pity from me.
I am a believer in the idea that one has to prove one’s case, not make up EXCUSES. The women’s movement and Californian radicals love to pretend that they are not interested in doing stuff they claim, they can do as good as men or better than men. Instead of proving this, they like to sit on their behinds, whining and whinging without actually doing anything to convince us we are wrong.
A team of researchers from the UK has shown that the under-representation of women at the top end in chess is almost exactly what would be expected, given the much greater number of men that participate in the game at all. Researchers Merim Bilalic, et al., have published their research on this statistical sampling explanation in a recent issue of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
There are NO BRITS at the top of the chess ranks. Many, nearly half, are Russian or former Russian territories or say, Chinese now that they are playing more often. One is an ‘American’ who is a Japanese male who immigrated as an adult to the US. It is really cheeky for the Brits to do this study, in Britain, which has few grandmasters compared to other countries like Russia or China.
The authors analyzed the population of about 120,000 German players as recorded by the German chess federation in April 2007. Based on more than 3,000 tournaments per year, the German chess federation measures the skill level of all competitive and most hobby players in the country (the rating correlates highly with the widely known Elo rating). The sample population included 113,386 men and 7,013 women (a ratio of 16:1).
There are ZERO German chess masters at the top. Zero! None. Germany used to produce masters at a high rate but WWI and then WWII took care of that. Today, nearly nothing. Iceland has more!
The excuse that women are doing poorly due to lack of interest or participation is pure BS. It is deliberately looking at the wrong things because this can be hauled out to explain everything on earth. It is false. Women don’t participate like boys in many, many areas of interest because girls don’t care due to the way their brains work.
Women are very different from men! But all modern ‘research’ and ‘studies’ and articles in once-sensible scientific publications are now hewing the party line that nothing is different between boys and girls and it is just that girls find ‘boy’ things like science, dangerous jobs, fighting wars, playing intellectual games: all this is stoooopid boy junk. NAAAY…Ickypoo stuff! Yuck.
Calling this ‘science’ is childish. It pisses me off. I want to clunk these ‘scientists’ who are ‘social studies’ people by the side of the head to wake them up. Here is a comment to the above whiny article pretending to be ‘science’ in a top ‘science magazine’:
BTW, has it occurred to anyone that fewer women than men participate in chess, not because it’s too hard for their tiny little minds, but because most women find chess a boring waste of time and ability?
ALL feminists use that tiresome, childish excuse. It is cemented into our culture. Women fail at many things not due to being different or anything basic or biological, nope. They just find ‘guy stuff’ to be boring and stupid! HAHAHA. Here is a woman’s comment which is very revealing:
I can’t answer for other women, but here are the reasons I quit playing chess:
– other women don’t play, meaning my only opponents were male
– males don’t take being challenged by a woman seriously, and they throw attitude
– when they lose, it’s not a nice scene (excuses, whining, display of temper)
So, she can’t play because no women? HAHAHA. She is the same as the men but she doesn’t want to play them because…they are sore winners and sore losers! That’s the trip here. What is she? Not a sore loser, nope, she just…didn’t enjoy playing and losing to losers who were nasty. And here is the one comment that I heartily endorse:
For me the differences seem obvious and I would say are a result of our biological evolution. They are summed up in the argument between man and wife about the mess in the garden. For the wife, it is a mess. That is what it is…and you cant argue with her, she is right…But for the man, the mess is in the process of becoming a new patio, or perhaps a fence..or a kitchen table. And if he does it, he is also right. That is the essence of the difference. Men look at the world and rearrange it into new things (and there have been studies done on very young children that have shown boys do have a better ability to rotate objects in 3 dimensional space, so this isn’t just opinion). For men, the tree beside a river is a bridge, or a boat…so on.
Men use these “virtual realities” within their minds to play out endless games of chess. But the price is not cheap. A sacrifice is made for this skill, and that is in his ability to think of the world as it is presented to him in the moment (probably why good chess players tend to be socially inept). And this is why husbands infuriate their wives…because half the time they aren’t there…their minds simply aren’t in the moment…they are drifting off to other points in space and time, whether real or imagined.
Of course, women (in general) are far more anchored to reality as it is. And thank god for that…without them men would probably float off into space never to be seen again. So women know the date of the next birthday, and the name of the next door neighbors children, and what happened to auntie whatever last Christmas…and the husband goes “really? oh my oh my”. Women talk with each other about these things and maintain a somewhat stable state of the world as it is…essential for raising children. And for women this is a sacrifice also.
Women and men have utterly different biological evolutionary histories. Women who were distracted by non-domestic stuff didn’t have children who survived. Throughout history, groups of females who didn’t reproduce are legendary. I had an Auntie Helen who didn’t have children while my mother had seven children, for example. All the childless women I knew growing up as a child were famous scientists, for example, that being my parent’s social circle.
They wrote books, went on expeditions, climbed mountains, etc. They didn’t babysit. My mother did all that, too, but then I got to do the babysitting for her (she PAID me, though!). The fact is, girls ain’t boys. We have to accept this biological fact. Nearly all the female leaders in Europe who are Bilderberg gangsters also have no children. Even the feminist males there, no kiddies, either! Isn’t that strange? Not.