Bilderberg Fake News Never Ends: Latest Victims—Christian Boys

 

Student begs mainstream media correctly report the real news: the ‘Indian’ beating the drum in the face of a young man was part of a gang of leftists who approached the boys who were waiting for their bus and began harassing them.  This event was totally fake news cooked up by SJW monsters and their handlers, the Bilderberg gang who pay the wages of liars and conspirators bent on destroying America and who want to leave us open to invaders who are quite hostile or want to loot the taxpayers.

 

Here is the video, an earlier video online shows the ‘Indian’ protestors moving from far away to approaching the young boys waiting for their bus.  The leader of this gang then approaches a young lad and begins wailing and drumming right in his face while glaring at him.  The student didn’t shove him away or punch him in the nose.  Amazing self control here!

Here is the totally evil Washington Post deliberately lying about this event:

 

The Israelites and students exchanged taunts, videos show. The Native Americans and Hebrew Israelites say some students shouted, “Build the wall!” although the chant is not heard on the widely circulated videos, and the Cincinnati Enquirer quoted a student at the center of the confrontation who said he did not hear anyone say it.

 

When a Native American elder intervened, singing and playing a prayer song, he found himself face to face with that dark-haired teen, whose frozen smile struck some as nervousness and others as arrogance.

 

Neither budged.

 

The young man at the center of the video, who identified himself to the Enquirer as 11th-grader Nick Sandmann, said he and his classmates had been called “racists,” “bigots” and worse, and he was “remaining motionless and calm” in hopes that things would not “get out of hand.”

 

The Native American elder said he was caught in the middle.

 

The full video of this event shows the guy with the drum aggressively barging into the students who were all standing still, they clapped along with his drumming.  So the drummer decided to pick on one student and stood inches away, aggressively drumming in the boy’s face.

 

The boy looked very uncomfortable.  The ‘elder’ wasn’t ‘caught in the middle’ he pushed his way into the ‘middle’.  This deliberate misrepresentation of real facts is typical of SJW reporters.

 

The point of the WP article is to enrage readers and make them hate someone who is innocent.  Like any bar brawlers, the WP editors like to misrepresent facts so they can feel victimized when they are actually the instigators of violence.

 

The comments section at the WP is revealing: the liberals suck down obvious lies and then rage against white boys, calling for them to be punished.  Meanwhile, sane people point out reality:

 

Yes, the videos show clearly that the man wasn’t trying to get to the Memorial and the students were not blocking all the steps, either.  Publishing complete lies is normal for the Washington Post which I can barely stand reading these days, it is utter tosh now.

 

And now, here below is on of the students who wrote a letter protesting a local news media outfit who defamed them all, I hope all the parents sue the station:

 

This fake news story defaming children infuriates me.  Time and again, mainstream media attacks children including Trump’s youngest child, mocking them, accusing them of being ‘racist’ (while excusing blatant racism by leftists of all sorts) and then never apologizing for this disgusting adult misbehavior.

 

Too stupid to figure out that lying about events, making up obviously fake news, will eventually backfire.  The need to be careful when reporting news is life and death.  And our mainstream media wants death.

 

They misreport death all the time.  When ‘minorities’ commit crimes, many mainstream news either evades reporting life and death information such as mall robberies and rapes or riots by blacks, or they report but won’t describe the criminals. deliberately.

 

If black teens rampage on the subway, the reporters will either show white teens in the background while reporting or won’t mention who was running wild.

Turning young, innocent boys into ‘evil racist monsters’ is one of the most disgusting and a campaign of harassment, abuse and demands all the boys be thrown out of school came pouring out of the leftists.  It was entirely a lynch mob at work.

 

The left is aping all the KKK stuff Democrats did 100 years ago.

24 Comments

Filed under .money matters

24 responses to “Bilderberg Fake News Never Ends: Latest Victims—Christian Boys

  1. Aurelius

    Andrew Anglin:

    “…The situation was not nuanced or complicated.

    We can see in the video what happened:

    Black Israelites were yelling rudely at the anti-abortion white kids (and also at the Indians)
    The white kids began making noise to drown out the black insulters
    They were rushed by a band of Indians, let by an old Indian with a drum
    The white kids just stood there

    All this was was racial harassment of white people, both from the blacks and the Indians.

    The media ran with “oh but look at his smirk, he’s giving hatred through that smirk” and went nuts with it, calling for violence against the lads, then they were condemned by the school itself which said it was going to start expelling these kids for having been attacked by this disreputable series of brown mobs.

    This, my friends, is how you make Nazis.

    You attack people for being white. You degrade and insult their identity. You call them evil for existing.

    You keep doing that, over and over again, and then the thing happens.

    The backlash.”

    You can also find the eloquent letter written to the local media by Nathan Sandmann, the “smirking” high school junior. It paints a very different picture of what happened.

  2. Melponeme_k

    All of this is a perfect example of IQ and how it allows the elites to manipulate us.

    Way back, after WWII, our elites wanted to find how to greater control the populace. The best way was through intelligence and psychology. Using German science as the basis both Jewish (Freud, Jung, Reich) and Nazi (Mengele & Co), what resulted was propaganda psychology attacks on all of us.

    They know the power of IQ. In the early to mid 1950s they gave extensive IQ tests to almost all American children. I think Elaine can attest to this fact. My mother also told me that she was given an IQ test. The more paranoid conspiracy sites state that the military had been experimenting on Military children but needed to expand their subjects. Hence the IQ tests to the general public. And this, it is claimed, is how they started targeting individuals for greater control.

    Believe me, we don’t even have half the information they do on IQ. They have probably even gone BEYOND the IQ tests that are released to the public now.

    Right after the 1950s began the MK ULTRA 60s of drugs, sex “freedom” (ha, what a joke), identity politics and welfare. They knew they needed to separate the lower IQ populations and put them into their own echo chambers. And since they lack the intellect to rise above the propaganda, they were drawn in to the lies. Meanwhile there was also an aggressive push for adoption of minority children. Especially the Native Americans. I wonder, had they identified the family’s with the better IQ quotients and therefore targeted them for removal? Honestly, I put nothing past these people.

    This is the result, minorities used as shock troops. Honestly, I see no way to help the indoctrinated. They are lost. It is the children that have to be reached. And this is also why they want to remove the rights of Parents over their own children.

  3. Melponeme_k

    Incidentally the “Native” person in the incident doesn’t look full blood. Just saying.

    ΩΩΩ
    ELAINE: My sister Barbara looks more ‘indian’ than that guy. He may have some ‘blood’ but his attitude is really crazy.

  4. Petruchio

    @#4Mel: Let’s look at the flip side of this IQ testing/studying. You say the Elites run these tests for Population control. What are these Elites going to do to people such as yourself (and moi if I can be so bold) who have them figured out? I assume their first step is to try to ignore you. Next, they will fight you. But what about after that?

  5. Melponeme_k

    @Petruchio

    They don’t want to get rid of us. Think of their “history”, think about what you read here and even what the rest of us post.

    These people create NARRATIVES. And the histories we read about are what they created. They may have created these narratives from whole cloth or they have taken real events and molded them for their needs.

    We have been repeating the past because the past is what they know. We are in a circle repeating the 20th century over and over and over. Why? Because then they can lead “history” around like holding a carrot in front of a donkey. They can’t let history naturally happen, they can’t control that but they can control narratives.

    What do we know for sure about the elites? That they think their blood is special. They keep their blood pure by marrying relatives, sometimes as close as second cousins. What do we know about their dealings with us? They sure are interested in our blood and our IQ.

    What else do we know about them? They sure seem to believe in some crazy ass religion. I read Miles Mathis and he thinks it’s all a put on. That the Luciferianism is just a gag they use for the public. And I can’t discount that idea, some of the elites may just be playing. But I also think there are other elites that are very serious about occultism.

    The elites supported Nazism and Communism. What do we know about both those movements? A strong penchant for Eugenicism by both. Since they can’t have pograms and concentration camps now because the public would never go for it…they have to bring the ones they want destroyed HERE. In the first world. They will let them run rampant until we are forced to rise up for war.

    As far as they are concerned it is a win/win. The dirty bloods are culled and the smart ones are taken a notch down during the fight.

    Then they can recreate society in what they think is paradise…mainly Plato’s Republic. I can’t tell you how much they love that allegory. It makes them cream their pants every time they think about it. They’ve been following that screed like a map. I keep trying to read it, but I never get past the first few pages. Almost like a block. I’ll finish it. I will.

  6. Aurelius

    @Melpomene

    The modern (20th century) study and practice of eugenics (and coining of the term) was pioneered in the UK and then the US, which were neither Communistic nor National Socialistic. Germany under National Socialism piggybacked from that. So how does that affect your narrative?

    Apart from a discussion of methods used to implement it, and the real intentions of those in charge, what is wrong in principle with eugenics (improving the genetic composition of a population), I wonder?

    The fact that the leaders of a given nation are interested in eugenics, is that supposed to tell us something (bad) about that leadership, apart from any other considerations??

    It seems like we’re getting the very opposite now, in formerly high-quality 1st-world populations.

    On the other hand, the Chinese are apparently leading the world in preparing to implement eugenics using gene technology. Like it or not, here it comes.

  7. Melponeme_k

    @Aurelius

    The elites are all related. Remember BLOOD! All the elites you see in the US, UK, Germany and other nations, from the Politicals to even the Entertainers are all Royals. Simple truth.

    Hitler spent a year in Liverpool studying art and living with relatives. Relatives who were nobles in the British Aristocracy. He didn’t piggy back on anything.

    The elites have always been Eugenicists. They are Occultists who dare interested in finding original bloodlines. They want to remake man into what they think we were before we mixed. The story they give us are myths about Aryans and Adam Kadmon.

    “It seems like we’re getting the very opposite now, in formerly high-quality 1st-world populations.”

    Yes, and they are counting on the smarter ones to fight the lesser to the death. That is what they want. Then their hands are free of genocide. You see, they don’t hold the blood of the people invading Europe or the US as valuable. Whatever DNA they are interested in is either not in them or considered worthless due to too much adulteration.

    Of course the elites war amongst one another. Japan has its own elite bloodline, their royal family. Who are destroying themselves by destroying their own country.

    Then, in China, it is said to be ruled by the Li family elites and Jewish families who have been in Asia for a very long time, such as the Kadoorie and the Dangoors.

    They are all in an insane race for the Holy Grail, the first DNA. Which they think will make them Gods and the rest of us mind controlled happy slaves.

  8. Aurelius

    @9 Mel:

    Questions not addressed; to wit:

    1. How does UK and US being pioneers of modern genetics affect your assertion that a distinguishing common point between NatSoc and Communism is that they both tend to embrace eugenics?

    2. What is wrong in principle with a society practicing eugenics?

    Actually, I think I just figured out the answer to #2. Tell me if I have it. If every nation is controlled by a common, worldwide, interrelated “elite” via “bloodlines,” then any major endeavor that any national government does, going back centuries up to the present time, is by definition evil.

    This also explains why any apparent rebellion, like the “yellow vest” protests spreading from France to other countries, is by definition ‘controlled opposition.’

    These elites also battle against each other across nations, even though, at the same time, they are monolithic in that they all are working for the same results. Do I have that about right?

  9. Melponeme_k

    @Aurelius.

    The questions are addressed, you are not reading them and refusing to make your own connections.

    1) The elites financed all major movements such as Nazism and Communism. If the elites are unabashed eugenicists, how can these movements not be? Are you going to look at the concentration camps and argue otherwise? Are you going to tell me the starvation of Ukraine was not? Incidentally, the reason why the USSR allowed Ukraine to starve was because it had very valid claims that it was the historical heart of the Slav empire not Russia.

    2) Eugenicists only know their own insanity based on their religious belief. We grow by mixing and creating new forms and abilities. What the elites are proposing is to wipe out natural innovation for their own insanity. This will eventually weaken and destroy humanity.

    “If every nation is controlled by a common, worldwide, interrelated “elite” via “bloodlines,” then any major endeavor that any national government does, going back centuries up to the present time, is by definition evil.”

    No, that is not evil. It is self interest and greediness but it isn’t evil. When this group seeks to eliminate certain people because they don’t think they are the right blood, then it is evil. But again, it depends on WHO the group is doing the murder.

    “These elites also battle against each other across nations, even though, at the same time, they are monolithic in that they all are working for the same results.”

    The answer is in your own question. Please start thinking. They want the same thing, total control and they all want to be top dog. There you have the struggle between them.

  10. Aurelius

    I’m really trying to understand, Mel, that’s why I ask clarifying questions. I wish you would give direct answers.

    For instance, referring to your earlier assertion that Communist countries lean towards eugenics — I had understood that under full-fledged Communism the best and the brightest, the intellectual and educated elite, and those who are virtuously strong enough to resist the ‘appeal’ or coercion of Communism — are targeted for elimination. Am I wrong about that? Because this policy is properly called “dysgenics” or the reduction in the quality of the population — the opposite of eugenics.

  11. Melponeme_k

    “Am I wrong about that? Because this policy is properly called “dysgenics” or the reduction in the quality of the population — the opposite of eugenics.”

    They get rid of the older people who are beyond mind control. Children are much easier to control and train.

    They want a society based on Plato’s Republic with the Philosopher Kings on top, a priest class, a military class, merchant class and then the slaves. This is a stratified society with no movement at all. You are in the class you are in forever. Huxley’s Brave New World is based upon this system. Yeah, he and his family were big time eugenicists. His book wasn’t a warning either. He and his ilk didn’t think us organized enough to put up resistance.

  12. AT

    I believe it is no coincidence most of these control mechanisms (and vaunted ambitions) took off with the oil age.

    Most people who have their needs met and exceeded don’t much care about much else, besides maybe their families and neighborhoods. They’ll nod along with the rest and be fat, dumb and happy.

    I suspect those who mistake this for their own virtuosity at creating narratives and manipulating information and peoples will be shocked when the largess is truly gone, post-peak-oil, and the fat dumb and happy turn to skinny, suspicious and mad.

  13. AT

    As far as eugenics goes, Singapore is way out in front of the pack. They have been practicing “carrot” eugenics for decades now, by turning their brightest and healthiest into baby factories, with six figure bonuses for each child born to a state certified couple.

  14. lou

    disgusting leftists

  15. lou

    from talk I posted, listen from 5-6 minutes. The guy is an actor, been in a Skrillex [dance] music video!!!!

    SKRILLEX

    Was he paid to go to DC and stir up trouble?

  16. lou

    , Singapore is way out in front of the pack. They have been practicing “carrot” eugenics for decades now, by turning their brightest and healthiest into baby factories, with six figure bonuses for each child born to a state certified couple. -Yellows are no longer so creative. Have to steal from Whitey.

  17. Melponeme_k

    @Lou

    Chinese society was very creative at one point. They created paper, book presses, gunpowder, finance, and fireworks. They were all motivated and set to enter the European scene by uniting with Rome, they just needed to figure out how to get around the Persians.

    What stopped their innovation were their elites. Their elites turned their society into a civil servant, stratified, lackey class and the society turned inward. Their religious beliefs also bound them to this mindset.

    Besides, why should they innovate now when our stupid elites are willing to give them everything and the kitchen sink?

  18. Whoa!!! Wait!!

    I came from the Norse/Norman invaders of Europe. Was ‘pure blood’ until we were exiled to the New World when my family mixed with French and Native Americans. But for 600 years, my family, like the British Royals, my cousins, intermarried very closely.

    They were the Rulers of England and France, of course. Look at paintings of royals in Europe who were very related to each other: over generations, they grew weirder and weirder looking.

    The inbreeding was terrible. What saved my clan was simple: we were exiled to the New World!

    We founded cities and drew borders, fought long and hard from the New Holland colony all the way across the continent to California and then to Arizona. A 400 year hike.

    Anyone who was stupid was…killed. The pressure of evolutionary power on my family insured that only the strong and smart survived.

    Evolution is a funky thing. Too much protection and genetic rot sets in. The royals and nobles of Europe fought in battles like fiends until 1500. Then, they stopped dead in their tracks, so to speak.

    By 1800, they retreated to safety and had lowly peasants do all the heavy lifting in fighting! By 1900, peasants began killing the royals who were either weak or stupid. The Brits are still stuck with their royals who are a clan of stupid, self-centered, useless creatures who cost a fortune and who do stupid things nearly nonstop now. YUCK.

  19. All ruling elites, the minute they no longer physically fight (think: ANCIENT ROME) they go insane, they get physically weak, each generation is dumber than the previous one and this is probably why most empires have a 500 year cycle from rising out of destruction and ashes, becoming very powerful and then rotting away totally.

    Evolution is a very cruel force that shapes life forms. When there is no evolutionary pressure, things fall apart rapidly. It is really odd how that works.

  20. Melponeme_k

    Yes, the elites are inbred and insane. But we can’t believe they are harmless just yet. They hold a great deal of power and are still within their wits to create a whole system of control.

    Plus they believe that with careful gene manipulation and breeding experiments (amongst themselves and us, their slaves), they can do away with the dangers of inbreeding.

    Meanwhile they will just succeed in killing off humans. As I wrote earlier, we only grow stronger by mixing.

    The main reason why the elites don’t believe in mixing is due to their concept of magic. They believe in blood magic and even more strongly in DNA magic. They believe the purer their blood, the more they are connected to the strengths of their ancestors. They think because the majority populations are mixed, we have no genetic provenance. We have no direct contact with our ancestors.

    I think this is one of the reasons why they wanted to mix some blood with Native Americans. They considered our blood undiluted and therefore having direct contact with ancestors and powerful entities. If your’re a magic minded person(as they seem to be), that is attractive.

    I used to think that getting rid of these Royals and Elite families would solve the problem. But that is impossible. Apparently they have hidden bloodline relatives all over the place. Most of them with mind control to carry on the blood legacy. Getting rid of them would be like trying to get rid of garden weeds.

    No, the change has to be within ourselves. A change for a more truthful, honest society that would make it impossible for them to thrive.

  21. Aurelius

    @#13

    “They get rid of the older people who are beyond mind control. Children are much easier to control and train.”

    This was your reply to my question about eugenics, but that has nothing to do with eugenics or dysgenics, as the category “older people” says nothing about whether they have ‘good’ genes or ‘bad.’ Plus, “older people” are by definition, I assume, beyond normal breeding age. Eugenics is about breeding.

    You have made the assertion that Communist societies in general practiced eugenics but provided no backing for that claim. I would be happy to hear a counter-argument, rather than a complex narrative that is non-falsifiable. Lacking that, I still maintain that the practice of eliminating the best and brightest and the most accomplished (thinking of the Asian instances of communism) is a form of DYSGENICS, the opposite of eugenics.

    You have said that the fact (as you assert) that NatSoc and Communist societies practice eugenics tells us something [bad] about them, but if societies organized on other models (e.g., UK, US, present China, and Singapore as mentioned above) also practice eugenics and even invented it in modern times, then this claim is not valid.

    Finally, no one has addressed the philosophical question: Is the study and practice of eugenics automatically a bad thing? I assert, No, it’s not; it could be done effectively and humanely, in theory.

    OK I’m tapping out on this thread.

    @#21 EMS

    This is sometimes represented this way:

    Hard times make strong men. Strong men create good/easy times. Easy times create weak men. Weak men leads to hard times.

    Something like that.

  22. Melponeme_k

    @Aurelius

    All these questions were answered.

    1) They focus on the children. Which they are doing now. They already have everyone’s information since the 50s at least (mass iQ tests) and people give everything away right now on the Internet, Facebook, Instagram etc.)

    Through cooked up schemes like global warming and other environment minded social programs (invented during the Nazi era), they will control people’s breeding, what they eat and where they live.

    2) The Chinese government eliminated the older, educated people during the cultural revolution then began again with the children. They are trying to move farmers out of the villages into the cities sometimes forcibly. Apparently they have quite a few cities with barely anyone living in them. What are they waiting for? Who knows.

    None of the children of the cultural revolution era have yet to revolt. NONE. We only learned that apparently communism can include a little capitalism without problems.

    3)”You have said that the fact (as you assert) that NatSoc and Communist societies practice eugenics tells us something [bad] about them,”

    READ, READ. I never wrote that in any of my posts. I wrote that the Elites are eugenicists, they supported these movements and therefore by relation these movements were eugenicist in nature.

    “but if societies organized on other models (e.g., UK, US, present China, and Singapore as mentioned above) also practice eugenics and even invented it in modern times, then this claim is not valid.”

    The elites are in charge of ALL societies. THERE ARE NO OTHER MODELS. How can you not understand this? IF the SAME PEOPLE rule everything that alone tells you there is one model. Correct?

    Again the elite, ALL the elite, are eugenicists. That includes ALLLLL elites in every country.

    “Finally, no one has addressed the philosophical question: Is the study and practice of eugenics automatically a bad thing? I assert, No, it’s not; it could be done effectively and humanely, in theory.”

    ANSWERED. I said nature needs uncontrolled space to innovate. We need to mix. Only nature can keep ahead of all the variables. We don’t have the brainpower not even with computers, to innovate against ALL changes.

    There is no humane way to do this. Especially when you have insane religious people in charge of it all. Did you get that the elite are insane? Is current society not proof enough?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s