DNC Joins Trump Stopping Illegal Aliens—But Liberals Still Self Destruct Or Kill Others

HAHAHA…the DNC/Bilderberg gang conspiracy to make us laugh to death, the Joker in Trump has caused all these gangsters to suddenly do a total U-turn and denounce illegal aliens storming our borders!  Wow.  All Trump had to do was tell these creeps, anyone invading the USA while waving foreign flags, will be housed in DNC-districts as close as possible to homes of the ruling elites who are sponsoring and protecting this obvious hostile invasion.   Now, they all want closed borders.



A black racist deliberately grabs a little white boy and tries to murder him by throwing him off a balcony.

Above is the story of Aaron Dugmore, a 9 year old child in Britain who was sent to a hostile school full of out of control immigrant children who bullied him until he killed himself.  England has zero freedom of speech and no 2nd Amendment to defend themselves.  Our (my) founding fathers put in the amendment about weapons because they understood that even the State has to be defied.


In England, police stop people traffic infractions and then search the vehicles to see if they can find something criminal and having even a utility knife means it is confiscated as a ‘weapon.’  I watch videos on You Tube of shows that feature police actions and one can see continuous actions which are forbidden in the USA, imposed on the British people who have absolutely no legal human rights.


The arrest of Assange violated his human rights, for example.  He is a whistleblower, not a criminal.  Remember the Pentagon Papers here in the US?  The NYT wasn’t sent to prison for it.  Watergate: ditto for the Washington Post.  In despotic England, reporting the arrest and imprisonment of Tommy Robinson, a popular political figure, was forbidden and the State was intending to punish anyone who reported real news but had to break down due to internet outrage as online people revealed all to the world.


This is why the State now is censoring Tommy Robinson and preventing him from reaching his supporters via secret deals with US tech firms who are now in a race to destroy America.  They are, in other words, traitors.


“I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants,but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN.WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS.PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own(Many Are VETS)How Can it Take Care Of More,” Cher said.


Just a week ago, she wanted to have open borders.  She is typical of these clowns.  Trump trumped them all, once again, revealing that they are all hypocrites and fools.  Rich liberals live in safe enclaves while flooding cities with ‘voters’ who are usually not good for cities and thus, these DNC strongholds are characterized by high crime rates, great public disorder, filth and chaos.


This is the voter base of the Democrats.  A very cynical use of humans who the Democratic leaders hate.  Even silly geeze like Occasionally a Cortez in NYC, adamantly refuse to live next door to their voter base.  Anonymous hackers who spent the weekend knocking Ecuadorian government websites offline have turned their attention to the United Kingdom, issuing a warning for the British government to “free Assange or chaos is coming for you.”

Now for very silly news, silly but tragic:Student, 22, who tripped and fell 40ft to her death from Fordham University’s clock tower at 3am after she ‘wanted a better view of NYC for Instagram’, will receive a posthumous degree, says college.  This happened in NYC. The female was up at 3am, probably very drunk/drugged. She did something remarkably stupid, egged on by her fellow fools. The parents should sue the school but can’t since she was an ‘adult’ but in today’s twisted world, 22 year olds in college are kindergarten kiddies.  Evidently, this pre-dawn climb was a ‘rite of passage’ for a group of giggly females who have no brains, this is why they were in school: to be as stupid as possible.


Seems this SJW female courts death so frequently, Death asked for a divorce.  This female is a product of schools that told her, she can do anything, even stupid things.  She thought it was funny to do very stupid things.  So she did them and won the Stupid Prize which often is death.  Every week now, some fool tries to pose on a cliff or roof or other dangerous places and dies.  Ooops.  Win the Darwin Award!

HAHAHA.  Before writing about this silly woman, I said, ‘She is a liberal who wants to work in publishing.’  And yes, she was.  Note the big, big glass of booze in the above picture.  How on earth do they teach ‘journalism’ in notorious SJW schools like Fordham?  I wrote for a newspaper when I was only 19 years old, did political cartoons, too.  While in school.  Never took any ‘journalism’ courses.  This crazy female was in school to mooch with other elitist females and then get a job in NYC writing junk for women who are suicidal, idiotic or both.


The Keating Hall tower is off limits to students at the university. In 2013, The Fordham Ram published an article about the gothic granite building and how students are forbidden inside. Students who violate this rule ‘would likely face disciplinary action if they entered it’.


She just did the jump a tad too early before being able to destroy society, first.  The school should NOT reward this ridiculous female and her friends.  Are the others with her expelled?  HAHAHA…no.  The fact that this building was ‘forbidden fruit’ meant the females were very attracted to it and wanted to court destruction.  Sounds like the entire leftist scheme to destroy civilization.  Fools, all.



Filed under .money matters

40 responses to “DNC Joins Trump Stopping Illegal Aliens—But Liberals Still Self Destruct Or Kill Others

  1. Zeke

    In high stakes poker – Trump did call their bluff.
    “Put up or shut up”.
    With the “I’m not going to build a wall; I’m going to build a bridge!”, crowd – comeuppance might be a judge Garrity Boston type ‘forced busing’ maneuver to deliver illegals to Cher’s estate or Hillary’s lily white town, Chappaqua. http://www.city-data.com/city/Chappaqua-New-York.html#b
    They’ll just move to Davos.

    (Maybe subjects like ‘food marketing’ and other such should be trade school and not fit subjects for college academic study.)

  2. Melponeme_k

    Black Magic Photos invoking the Whore of Babylon (Women in Red). They released these photos for a reason. It could be a prelude to one of their crazy spells.

    Or it could just be the build up to May 1st when the Whore is thought to escape the Abyss. They celebrate this at the Metropolitan Museum of Art or The Four Watchtowers.

    Other symbolism

    Margaret meaning Pearl. In many fairy tales Pearls are guarded by Dragons. So that is telling your brain: The Whore of Babylon riding the beast.

    You don’t know it consciously unless you are hooked into the symbolism search. But your subconscious knows.

    In regards to young woman. They are not only referencing the Whore but the FALLEN angels.

    Note the crazy numbers. She was “22” and she fell 40 (representing 4) feet. They only use her last name which equals “99” or “9”

    22 is the number of manifestation.

    4 is the number representing the union of the Trinity. But not the Christian Trinity. It represents the union of Isis, Osiris and Horus.

    9 is the number of divine will. 99 is a master number that perfects the energies of 9.

    Isis is another face for the Whore of Babylon.

    Why was it so important to show Monfries drinking? Because it invokes this famous image from Crowley’s Thoth Tarot.

    YOU MUST KNOW these symbols. It is the only way to break their spells and release your own subconscious from their influence.

  3. Rob

    Well she *was* a senior soon to graduate. I bet there is some incentive for issuing the diploma and collecting additional fees from the parents and enforcing the student loans. 😉

  4. Petruchio

    “A black racist deliberately grabs a little white boy and tries to murder him by throwing him off a balcony.” Living in MN and close to Mall of America I probably have more info on this story than others here. The news I get is that this black dude that tossed the kid off the 3rd floor balcony was an aspiring Gangsta wannabe from Chicago. This attempted murder of the boy was done merely so this black guy could establish his “cred” with one of the Chicago Black gangs. Usually the black dudes from Chicago who think they are “gangsta” wear Chicago Bulls outfits. Baseball caps, Bulls jackets, etc. So apparently that is why the kid was tossed from a balcony. So some a#@#hole gangsta wannabe could join a Chicago street gang.

  5. Petruchio

    And let me mention one more thing about the attempted murder of the 9 year old white boy at Mall of America. The local Minneapolis newspaper–called by some “The Fishwrap Factory”, refers to this attempted murder with the front page headline, “Boy hurt in Attack”. That’s like saying, “Titanic damaged by Iceberg”. This 9 year old is in a hospital fighting for his life and has been since he was attacked. The Miineapolis newspaper is a NYT wannabe type paper. No credibility whatsoever.

  6. Melponeme_k

    The Black Magic continues even in the other photos.

    They show the boy who was murdered next to SANTA…SATAN. They are using this poor child to invoke another entity. That is the Transgender God Attis. This is who the Elite worship during the wheel of the year. He/she is born on Dec 25, is castrated and dies around March 22 then is resurrected on March 25.

    The half face/half mask on Assange invokes Janus Programming. In Pagan religion, Janus was the beginning and the end of every festival. He was worshipped before every other god at every festival. He looks forward and looks back. In Programming, the image of Janus RESETS a victim’s alters. It takes them back to a previous “saved” point in time. The reason why they turned Assange into Janus is because they want to take us all back to 2012 and, in essence, REPROGRAM us. They want to erase the cultural upsurge that elected Trump that was growing during that year.

  7. KHS71

    That’s more than we got here. The Kansas City Red Star did not even have an article on the event. If you only read the Red Star, you would not even know it happened. Typical but then they are a McClatchy paper. Notice I do not call them a newspaper. They’re not.

  8. AT

    Clearly our secrecy laws are broken when reporters get jailed despite the first amendment freedoms of speech and press.

    What we need is a judicial rubric that exams whether so-called secret information is a matter of public concern in a democracy for the purposes of accountability and voter decisionmaking. Then, if so, whether the release of the information endangers anyone, imminently. If so, whether that danger can be removed. Etc. . .

    What’s more, because the timing was contrived, the flip side to the Assange arrest is what news does it cover up? A 10 billion dollar IMF loan bought his head from Ecuador? It also bought the timing. . . the same week Trump threw the election in favor of Bibi by declaring war on Iran under the AUMF. . . and the same week AOC and her socialist pals grill all five Wall Street CEO’s in Congress for the first time since 2009?

    Unless there’s something even bigger they kicked even further under the rug?

  9. Wc

    Elaine, do you think the Notre Dame fire is an attack or accident?

  10. Melponeme_k


    What does your instinct tell you?

    April 15 is a holy day for Skull and Bones. They do rituals on this day. They glorify their God, Ba’al (Molech or Saturn), with offerings of money.

    April 19 is a festival dedicated to Ba’al(Molech, Saturn). It is a ritual of FIRE. According to SRA sites, they sacrifice children to fire on this day.

  11. Yes, this is a terrible magic number day. I am very upset about Notre Dame. This is a terrible tragedy. It was also caused by humans. It is either a terror attack or hubris. That is, humans being careless.

    The Church was under renovation. Renovations are highly dangerous so of course, no one bothered to set up systems to deal with fires. And yes, this is a day the Skull and Bones dullards at Yale do their black magic.

  12. Melponeme_k

    Look at the symbols I listed earlier. This is deliberate.

    Leading up to this crime, we got inundated by depictions of the Whore, the Beast, Child Sacrifice now a huge sacrificial fire to their God. Even before it all started they invoked Janus.

    Look on Crowley’s card. The Lust card (Strength in regular decks) is under the sign of Leo. The exalted Fire sign.

  13. honeybagder don't care

    Our (my) founding fathers put in the amendment about weapons because they understood that even the State has to be defied.

    Can you produce any sources or even inside information to support this? Because this has been an area of heated debate for a long time and if you could quickly clear this up many, many people would appreciate this. For example, I know of no credible sources that support the proposition that the original intent of the Second Amendment was to authorize resistance against the state. I believe there are some that support the idea that one purpose at least, in times when standing armies were widely distrusted, was to be able to quickly put down rebellions against the so-called “free” state.

  14. Tom W Harris

    Meanwhile, Mayor Rahm lays down the law about immigration:

    Worthless sumbitch.

  15. Family history: my family ALWAYS lived on the ‘frontier’. We did this because we liked being in charge of things, ourselves. We floated across the continent, armed to the teeth. Sometimes, ancestors or mine were in the military. but we were always on the frontier.

    My great grandmother killed people in old Arizona where she lived back during the Civil War years onwards, for example.

    We knew the second amendment meant we got to use arms to fight and protect ourselves, it was obvious why. People today are very naive and think they can run a country, disarmed. Guess what?

    These places are INVADED by ARMED people duh. We see this in Europe today, being overrun by invaders. We are being invaded, too. I grew up on the southern border next to Mexico.

    I used guns and other weapons when people attacked me or my homestead. I did this since childhood. Even as a kid, I carried. And had to use it.

  16. honeybagder don't care

    @ #17

    That’s all very interesting, but it hardly answers the question: i.e.,who specifically among your ancestors had a hand in crafting the Constitution? And how, for example, were they able to do this if they were on the frontier and not in Philadelphia or at least in some state capital?

  17. honeybagder don't care

    Also, from what you describe your family seems like rouge thugs looking to plunder, pillage, and exert control having no use for the rule of law except perhaps when it furthers their own ambitions. And that tradition seems to carry on here in spirit if not in fact.

  18. AT

    “If the American people really tire of democracy and want to make a trial of Fascism, I shall be the last person to object. But if that is their mood, then they had better proceed toward their aim by changing the Constitution and not by forgetting it.“

    H. L. Mencken

  19. Lou

    19–Did Granny kill in self defense –that is the question.

  20. honeybagder don't care


    It was always “self defense” when Normans did the killing. Our word “murder” comes from “murdrum”:

    Those were the good ol’ days Elaine seems to long for so much.

  21. My Pettit side of the family was on the frontiers. My Steele/May/Bard side stayed on the East Coast.

  22. Dear Honeybadger: I hope you learn to read instead of wildly attacking people. I was not boasting, I was explaining how things worked in the past and the present.

    What you are, I am assuming, is a Maoist: you want to hate everything in the past, you hate civilization and want to destroy it and are pleased to see things collapse into chaos.

    That is very sad.

  23. By the way, the ‘frontier’ in 1776 was just beyond Pittsburgh. Remember Davy Crockett? Also, my Steele ancestors lived in Pittsburgh back in 1877. By then, it was firmly on the ‘east coast’ and was ‘civilized’. While my ancestors in Tucson were on the ‘wild frontier.’

    I wish they still taught US history in schools. It is sad, watching this deterioration of how to understand history or think straight.

  24. honeybagder don't care

    @ #24

    I hope you learn to read instead of wildly attacking people.

    Well, this applies to you to a tee! Mirrors are interesting, as you are so fond of pointing out. I have explained more than once, I do not have a political agenda, let alone a Maoist one. I will, however, call out misinformation. Let the record show you still have not answered the question. For example, we know specifically which of your ancestors founded Skull and Bones, crafting the Constitution, e.g., The Second Amendment, not so much.

    Last time I checked, your personal family history was never a subject taught in schools. So how can lack of proper education in that area that be the problem in my so-called “deterioration of how to understand history or think straight”? If the answer to my question is in published material that was at one time taught in schools, please point to it.

    And I am still waiting for some historical support for your claim that the original intent of the Second Amendment involved authorizing resistance against the State.

  25. honeybagder don't care

    Also, this phase of civilization is coming to an end; there’s nothing you can do about it. And there is historical support for the argument that, to some extent at least, the proverbial “chickens coming home to roost” are a factor. Making this observation does not mean that I “hate everything in the past” or “hate civilization and want to destroy it”.

    What I do hate is war, violence, and deception. And while one may argue these properties are ingrained in human nature, what percentage of species have gone extinct because of failure to adapt?

  26. Most people learn ‘history’ from books written by humans. Aside from that is ‘family history,’ My own ancestors were highly educated due to being elites. They wrote a great deal including making up newspapers (the concept, that is) as well as recording events around them, acts of Parliament, etc.

    What I like to point out is, the history you READ is VERY ABBREVIATED. It is very ‘sketchy.’ It is also very fluid and each generation changes the past according to what they want the past to be, not what it was.

  27. As for ‘resisting the state’ the founding fathers did exactly that and felt it should always be available which is the RIGHT to bear ARMS was giving to ALL citizens unlike just 100 years earlier, it was only nobles and their employees who were allowed to have ‘arms’.

  28. Jim R

    Actually, to be on a par with state power, the citizen militias should have access to nukes.

    But seriously, they should be able to get RPGs and MANPADs. The ‘arms’ industry has made a lot of progress in 250 years. The Constitution just says ‘arms’, it does not limit the citizen-militia to the possession of muzzle-loading blunderbusses.

  29. Right now, Macron is using military force to stop peaceful marches in Paris and elsewhere in France, a country where citizens are not allowed the ability to fight back.

  30. honeybagder don't care

    There is always going to be opposition to one government policy or another. Since the Framers desired a stable government, it follows that any event that might trigger a Second Amendment implied right to use armed resistance against the State would likely have to be quite extraordinary. For example: if part of the federal military was insubordinate to civilian authority, or an official defeated in an election refused to step down. At any rate, a tax protest is unlikely to do it.



    In my opinion, if there is any modern day constitutional issue that would trigger such a right the most obvious would be whether the “black budget” is being used to fund a shadow government in violation of the Statements and Accounts Clause, thereby constituting a domestic usurpation of power. There is some debate on this; but where is the widespread, public attention focused on this issue from the “don’t tread on me” crowd?

  31. AT


    “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

  32. AT

    Signed by John Hancock and Sam Adams. Two guys who saved their cache of arms from advancing British because of Paul Revere’s ride.

    I think Adams paid for the guns.

  33. Yes, they were revolutionaries. Do note that the right to defend one’s PROPERTY is a key thing here. The Democrats are inviting invaders into the country. We have a right to physically defend ourselves. The Democrats want to remove this.

  34. honeybagder don't care


    The Framers weren’t revolutionaries. They were secessionists. The Yanks wanted to be in business for themselves.

    Do note that the right to defend one’s PROPERTY is a key thing here.

    Exactly. There has never been a war fought over “rights”. For example, the most basic rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights already existed at common law in some form or another. All wars are fought over property. In fact, in the “real world” political liberty in general is arguably more of a myth than reality. It’s all about “who controls what”. You said so yourself.

    If the Framers were so keen to make a right to resist their new government, why didn’t they include an express provision in the Constitution? For example, several state constitutions do exactly that.

    Also, there is a tremendous amount of diverse historical material available to anyone wanting to look nowadays, even including primary sources. So your contention that I don’t know what I’m talking about because my knowledge of history is insufficient for this or that general reason is bogus.

    In related news, it looks the the Constitutional Patriots missed their chance to invoke their implied right to resist the State when the feds came for their leader.

  35. AT

    The wealthy framers like Adams just wanted to be able to keep making money without getting ripped off. Anyway they were not all wealthy. Did Hancock even have a pot to piss in? Franklin and others certainly saw bearing arms as part of a right (or duty) to resist tyranny.

    (The contention that the Yanks simply wanted secession to run the show is Anglophile revisionism.)

    As far as why no express right to resist tyranny in the federal government when it was included in state governments? That actually proves the point.

    The framers deliberately made an exceedingly weak federal government of very limited enumerated powers:

    No general police power
    No standing armies
    No income tax piles of money to build vast federal agencies
    No conditional spending for state-legislature arm-twisting
    No infinite commerce clause jurisdictional hook to pass intra-state laws
    A tenth amendment that meant something

    All of that has been reversed now, of course, but, at the time the constitution was written, the framers were more concerned about state tyranny than federal tyranny.

  36. honeybagder don't care

    It is a melancholy reflection that liberty should be equally exposed to danger whether the Government have too much or too little power, and that the line which defines these extremes should be so inaccurately defined by experience.

    ~James Madison

    The War of Independence itself was very messy. There were several conflicting elements and lots of profiteering. Afterward, the Federalists were concerned that under the Articles of Confederation the federal government was too weak to put down rebellions and fight wars. There continued to be competing elements fighting for various interests. And those elements were not above striving to enhance their own power, even as they worked to create a governmental framework they hoped would stand the test of time. What we ended up with is an enigmatic piece of parchment we call “The Constitution”. Madison hoped the principles embodied on that parchment would eventually take hold as a constitution in the Aristotelian sense. Desire for power, however, quickly prevailed over philosophical niceties.

    For politics has always been, at its core, the raw struggle for power. First, conquer the territory. Then, argue about how to divide the spoils. And conquer they did: from sea to shining sea, the way these things are always done: through deceit, treachery and force. Then when land to steal for profit became scarce, the financiers stepped in. The War of Anti-Independence (WWI) was unleashed and the American Empire exploded. The course was plotted towards the bloated and unconstitutional deep state we have today. But what about the Second Amendment? Isn’t that supposed to secure liberty? Will the American People use it? If so, how? Will they demand peace? Or will they will largely abide by the status quo until the financial system collapses, then slaughter every innocent Jew they can get their hands on in a panicked frenzy, before obeying their masters’ orders into complete destruction via WWIII? As one astute observer put it, History is a dog chasing its tail as the Goddess writes in blood. And we will never be free from the yoke of the so-called “elites” until they throw a war and no one shows up.

  37. honeybagder don't care

    OK technically there was no “federal” government before the convention but whatever.

  38. MY FAMILY came to North America 500 years ago. We moved across the continent coming to California in 1849 and Arizona in 1854. We fought big and little battles. We were very well armed.

    We made treaties, we fought for land, we exploited stuff and we built…a lot of stuff. My own ancestors made this whole civilization thing possible, you know.

    People take this for granted. Well, it wasn’t easy, it was hard work, dangerous.

    When I moved into dying NYC, it was dying. People on welfare were actively putting entire parts of the city to the torch, looting and killing.

    I fought this ferociously and more or less, won. Now, the DNC is winning there, importing more people to destroy that stupid city and it is now being relentlessly wrecked yet again.

    This is history, in a nutshell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s