Swede Sexcapades

ΩΩSex is great fun except if you are in Sweden.  I would strongly suggest to all men boycott Swedish women until they change the laws to reflect reality.  I am a feminist who believes in free love and the right of women to have sex for fun and these laws irritate me tremendously.  Talk about Victorian restrictions on sex!  What is Sweden?  Iran?  Saudi Arabia?  Next comes flagellation and stoning for extra marital sex!

ΩΩA number of mind-numbing numbskulls in the mainstream media have switched their stripped gears on the latest attempt to frame someone with sex charges when they are doing something that irritates powerful people: they are now accusing online investigators who are much more alert than mainstream reporters in digging up the truth about spurious, silly sex charges.  The mainstream media, when they out to get someone, will conveniently overlook squalid details that undermine their endless stories of Victorian damsels traumatized by having dirty sex with important people.  Instead, nearly always, the women in these tales of terror are often sexual predators seeking out controversial people and then dragging them through the muck AFTER BEING REJECTED by these men.  That is the key: the rejection launches a hysterical attack which is picked up by political operatives seeking to destroy someone.

.

ΩΩThe latest stupid example of this is the Assange affair.  Bill Clinton didn’t penetrate Monica, he did spill his seed on her (enraging the Pope who thinks all semen is precious and all sex must produce children).  The Pope is a prime example as to how insane the Swedish sex story is so silly.  As far as the Pope is concerned, Assange is in the wrong FOR using a condom!

.

ΩΩThis condom conundrum is just plain silly.  The online investigators have a much better timeline of events and include all the side issues unlike the narrative told by the dishonest mainstream media in the US (we are a captive audience here, all our mainstream media is deliberately and maliciously dishonest.  Online news can be dishonest, too, which is why one sector has decided, totally insanely, that the Israelis are behind Assange and not attacking him.  Well, look at the latest news:  Report: Assange accuser flees to Middle East, may not be cooperating with police | Raw Story

ΩΩ

  • Ardin’s blog shows that she has recently posted from the Palestinian territories. Her most recent blog posts make no mention of WikiLeaks or its founder, Julian Assange. Some of Ardin’s most recent Tweets suggest sympathy for WikiLeaks.

 

  • “MasterCard, Visa and PayPal — belt them now!” Ardin urged in a Tweet Wednesday, evidently referring to the cyber-attacks launched on those institutions after they severed their relationships with WikiLeaks.

 

  • In a more recent Tweet, she complained of the media reports digging into her background. “CIA agent, rabid feminist / Muslim lover, a Christian fundamentalist, flat & fatally in love with a man, can you even be all [these things all] the time?” she Tweeted in Swedish.

.

ΩΩWhy on earth did she run off to Israel?  She claims, setting afire half of the earth’s internet in a cyberwar, she is going to bring peace to the Middle East!  Evidently, she stopped cooperation with the prosecutor weeks ago!  The new storyline that she was scared of sex diseases is falling apart.  If she was scared of diseases, she would be #1 in demanding information, not running off to have sex in Israel.  And yes, she is having sex.  She is a sex fiend.

.

ΩΩThis is my proof:

  1. Assange didn’t know her until he gave a speech where she batted her pretty eyes and said alluring things like, ‘Please come to my cottage and have sex with me, please?’  He didn’t pursue her, she went after him in classic ‘groupie’ fashion.  She was no fainting virgin who he promised to marry and then had sex. She is a modern adult woman trawling for sex conquests.
  2. He followed her to her domicile and then had sex more than once.  Various things happened during this nocturnal cycle.  Condom use was off and on (hahaha) which is often the case in sexual encounters and is why we have ‘morning after’ pills and abortions, all of which I have used in the past.
  3. The  next day, she invites him to a party she arranged and there she paraded him as her paramour/conquest.  She was obviously quite pleased with herself.
  4. She tweeted to her friends what a great lay he was.
  5. She asked him to contact her again and he probably said yes.
  6. He leaves.  She waits.  No phone calls, no emails.  Rage rises.  He treated her like she was, a one night stand by a star struck groupie in a foreign land.
  7. She finds another woman who agrees that he is a cad, having free sex with sexually aggressive women seeking cheap thrills and he let them down so why not punish him for being like them, running around having sex with strangers!
  8. SHE WENT TO THE PRESS and told her goofy story leaving out many details that would have alerted the press in Sweden, she is a nut case.
  9. After this, the US finds out about the sex thing and goes nuts, overjoyed that the classic smear campaign could be launched with the help of the Zionist media to smear a man who is screwing with their secrets especially the cables that reveal the Saudis are working with the Zionists against nearly all Muslims!  Dangerous information indeed.
  10. So they reopen the case which the prosecutor in Sweden thought was a stupid case and had dropped it and suddenly, Assange was a rapist instead of a victim of a vindictive female.  They then took this ball and ran with it.
  11. The holding of Assange with no bail is ridiculous and without precedent in this sort of Swedish sex case.  The holding was to prevent him from using modern communication methods.  He is identical to the political prisoner in China which these same witch hunters are celebrating so very loudly via the Nobel Political Peace Prize.
  12. After raising an international firestorm, this batty female runs off to Israel and begins to tweet all sorts of irrational stuff and probably is correct in saying, she is  not CIA.  She is probably a loose cannon being used by the CIA. But isn’t CIA herself.  She is a tool for them.  She, on the other hand, is a firebrand who wants to be paid attention when she wishes but like her sex life, wants us to stop paying attention when she wants to stop being in the eye of the storm.  This is childish.

.

ΩΩThis whole business can be easily understood but the establishment is once again, trying to turn a sexual predator female into a victim.  The victim in this story is Assange.  He didn’t promise to marry this crazy woman.  He didn’t lie to her except for the part of ‘I’ll call you later,’ which all men say automatically.  No crime in that.  Businesses say that, casting agents say that, politicians say that, lovers say that.

.

ΩΩThe Swedish blonde is being yanked around by forces bigger than her but she and she alone launched this when she ran off to the media to smear Assange in the first place.  The minute she did that, things went out of control because she made everything public.  She has to answer our public questions since she made the accusations public.

.

ΩΩThe mainstream media in the US and England are deliberately not mentioning this very key fact when they discuss this case.  They are right now trying to shame us into not talking about this broad because we are invading her privacy. Well, she is the lunatic who decided to air her own dirty panties in public! So we have a right to probe deeper without the mainstream media condoms which are used to protect them from telling us the truth about anything.

.

ΩΩAnd the Wikileaks business is raw sex: instead of us getting filtered information wrapped in rubber, we get the real thing, straight and hard and I happen to like this!  Whenever the media covers a story, I want to see the actual data and documents so I can interpret them myself!  I like raw data and the other thing that makes all of these sexually predatory females blush (having fun in bed when I was still young and somewhat attractive).

.

ΩΩWe can  never win the media war since we are all fighting with small arms and they are using nuclear bombs but Wikileaks has bolstered our side tremendously since we can access actual real information which is why the mainstream media backs the government in trying to kill this so they can resume the propaganda with no counter information interfering with this.

.

ΩΩAnd this is the real battle.  And I would strongly suggest to Sweden they change their insane and impossible sex crime laws to be more realistic.  More about that in a later article.

 

sunset borger

 

side picture begging boneEmail:

emeinel@fairpoint.net

MAILING ADDRESS:

EMS NEWS

P.O. BOX 483

BERLIN, NY 12022

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.


 

sunset borger

14 Comments

Filed under .diplomacy, Politics

14 responses to “Swede Sexcapades

  1. JT

    I sometimes wonder about IT people.

    At least in my career my idealism faded pretty fast once I got to leadership positions.
    Never liked it. Lying to employees.
    Every boss would love to spy on his employees too.

    The disillusioned IT pro´s are a quite interesting force now.
    They are good people IMO.
    They are not stupid either. And they like to check out their information before believing it.
    Swedish women might be their achilles heel though 😀 .

    “We explore… and you call us criminals. We seek after knowledge… and you call us criminals. We exist without skin color, without nationality, without religious bias… and you call us criminals. You build atomic bombs, you wage wars, you murder, cheat, and lie to us and try to make us believe it’s for our own good, yet we’re the criminals.

    Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that of judging people by what they say and think, not what they look like. My crime is that of outsmarting you, something that you will never forgive me for.

    You may stop this individual, but you can’t stop us all… after all, we’re all alike.”

    http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/manifesto.html

    That´s a pretty good manifesto being from 1986.

  2. Christian W

    Boring US MSM that won’t publish you Elaine, I’d love to read stuff like this in the US MSM!

    “we get the real thing, straight and hard and I happen to like this!” Erm lol 😀

  3. Kurt

    Elaine, apparently now there are a large number of well known people including Zbigniew Brzezinski who think the way I thought and commented at your website the other day.

    Wikileaks: A Big Dangerous US Government Con Job

    By F. William Engdahl

    For anyone who has studied the craft of intelligence and of disinformation, a clear pattern emerges in the Wikileaks drama.
    The focus is put on select US geopolitical targets, appearing as Hillary Clinton put it “to justify US sanctions against Iran.”
    The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. A 39-year old Australian hacker holds the President of the United States and his State Department hostage to a gigantic cyber “leak,” unless the President leaves Julian Assange and his Wikileaks free to release hundreds of thousands of pages of sensitive US Government memos. A closer look at the details, so far carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times, reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress the agenda of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to Russia to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet.

    Read the rest from the link below:

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/10/wikileaks-a-big-dangerous-us-government-con-job/

    ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ

    ELAINE: I think this veternstoday site is crappy. Engdahl is an idiot. He is one of many who is out to dig the grave for Wikileaks for a reason and if you have a brain, you might figure this out.

  4. Christian W

    That is nonsense Kurt. Read The Guardian or go directly to the source and you see there is no such spin in the wikileaks. The spin you see if from US/Zionist media like the NYT who naturally “catapults” the Zionist propaganda at any opportunity.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/

  5. emsnews

    Thanks, Christian W. The US public is led by the nose and they think that when Americans who get published etc attack Wikileaks because the NYT and WP and others cherry pick pro-Zionist stuff (hells bells! All the memos were written by Zionists in the first place!) therefore, it means WIKILEAKS is Zionist. This is just dumb. So dumb, anyone suggesting this should get their heads examined.

  6. nah

    I know the guy asnage hung his neck out there and spoiled a few birthday parties
    .
    but is there more to this crap than the US military gets people killed… and our government is up in everyone’s business
    .
    WHAT ABOUT THE BANK LEAK… emsnews/zerohedge digs deeper than these clowns so why the ‘CYBARWAR’
    .
    frankly im a little pissed at wikileaks weak analysis of ‘THE GRAND CHESSBOARD’ or whatever… this shit is not rocket science, you dont have to leak basics using your Drivers License…
    .
    imean these are real memos and facts right… why cant they speak for themselves
    .
    AND I WANT THE BANKS that sounds like a leak… but then again FED disclosures provided by congressional law are more empowering for the people than WHAT
    .

    .
    Super Cyber War?

  7. PDKKAD

    Wayne Madsen says the same. This wikileaks case is a inside job to police the Internet:

    http://dprogram.net/2010/12/09/patriot-act-for-internet-ahead-wayne-madsen/

    ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ

    ELAINE: This merely proves what I have said many times in the past: Wayne is a total kook. Look, a real analysis is one that has the proper cause and effect in mind. If we use our freedoms and use our civil rights, this usage is NOT the cause of tyranny. Tyranny exists UNTIL we use our freedoms. The Internet has always been a great channel to get around propaganda but it takes time for propagandists to stop the internet. In Europe, they passes laws allowing EU countries to censor the internet with the excuse, this stops Naziism.

    China blocks the internet but both places has a lot of citizen anger over this and it is backfiring. The US has a propaganda story about how our internet is free but the Zionists itch to stop it. Of course, if ANYONE of ANY SORT were to seriously breech the walls of ethnic/religious isolation erected by Zionists, if the general public is to go against Zionist propaganda, the Zionists will begin censoring and shutting down the internet!

    I worry about this all the time long before Wikileaks even existed. They will use any excuse to stop the internet from talking about Zionism. They squelched it in the mainstream media and the early group forum sites banned anyone who mentioned AIPAC and Zionism. When I first published a comment at major media forum explaining who AIPAC is, I was instantly banned. All major websites used to do this! People walked on eggs. Now, we don’t care anymore and the topic of ‘What is AIPAC’ and ‘Who are the USS Liberty people’ is no longer a secret. It used to be a secret!

    Just for that reason alone, the mainstream media itches to join the government to reimpose the Cone of Silence on the US public by controlling all of the blogs and non-mainstream websites. But it won’t just be because of Wikileaks, it will be because of the conspiracy web sites, many of which are quite insane, I fear.

  8. JT

    @PDKKAD

    So we should blame wikileaks for internet policing? Is that the point?

    What about if wikileaks is a strong case against internet policing? What wonderful unbiased and unpropagandazied info we get from them. Information that we cannot get from media anymore.
    😉

  9. emsnews

    Correct. But the latest poll says 70% of Americans are mad at Wikileaks! They get 100% of their political information from the mainstream media, after all.

    The 30% that is for Wikileaks is very divided as we see. The noxious brain-dead bloviators on this side of the game are rapidly being infested with conspiracy stories against Wikileaks and I can’t stop these things from happening. For some reason, people don’t like logic. They love to ‘see behind things’ instead of logic and thus, are easily misled by mischievous people who pretend they have inside information.

    I look at the logic of a situation. For example, I don’t say, ‘Assange is innocent’ I say, ‘Swedish rape laws are insane and should be changed’ and give reasons why. This is a very critical difference. My opinion about rape laws is based on my life experiences and my constant irritation at attempts on the left and right to impose Victorian morals on us.

    Just as my support of Wikileaks isn’t based on what they release but the fact they give me raw data. Using this, I can see the world as the organizations and governments see it and then analyze it and criticize it! I love Wikileaks! I wish all the data was given out but Wikileaks has been carefully filtering it for names and redacting these working with the Guardian’s staff and I am OK with this. I would not be OK with the NYT doing this.

    So things are slow but Wikileaks wants to protect themselves and this failed because our government doesn’t care if the Pentagon Iraq murder tapes were released. They are super-angry that rank war crimes are exposed!

    Obama is helping the CIA and Pentagon hide torture pictures and videos. Not to save us but to hide rank war crimes that our leaders should go to prison and here in the US, the mainstream media yaps all the time about war criminals overseas but are totally mute about Israeli and American war criminals.

    So Wikileaks is very vital and I am super-pissed that people on the ‘we don’t listen to the government or mainstream media’ are now being set to mindlessly attack Wikileaks! GAH. Stupid! Stupid! Insane! Stop it, guys! Let the mainstream do the attacking! We defend Wikileaks!

  10. JT

    We just had had a similar poll here.

    Are wikileaks cables beneficial?
    Yes 61%
    No 22%
    not meaningful 16%
    http://www.uusisuomi.fi/kysely/onko-wikileaks-vuodoista-haittaa-vai-hyotya

    US media looks like a big joke at the moment. You´re turning inwards.

    It is as Goebbels says; the lie has to get bigger and bigger.
    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

  11. JT

    @elaine

    And I must add that nobody is anti-american about this.
    People´s general reaction is “Yes we all knew that´s what their like. War is shit civlians die.”
    People here have no illusions about empires.

    This banning free speach and going after wikileaks is far worse than the leaked cables.
    But nro 1 US priority is to keep the home base in the dark. No?

  12. emsnews

    Indimedia is this website I no longer respect. They are the ones pushing the ‘Assange=Israel’ story. This is a ‘circle the wagons’ moment on the web and this group of clowns are pushing that ridiculous and very badly resourced story which is being picked up by way too many people who can’t think rationally (it is now painfully obvious the Zionists are trying to suppress Wikileaks!).

Leave a comment