Podesta Illegally Blames Putin For DNC Conspiracies Against Voters


Crowd screaming “I read your emails” while Clinton campaign chairman talks Wikileaks – YouTube:

This video is Podesta talking about last night’s news story, the Weiner FBI investigation and Hillary’s crimes.  Immediately, as a huge crowd behind him yell about all this, he starts talking about Putin and Russia and blaming them for the Hillary/Podesta corruption being revealed and he gets hotter and hotter on this issue doing the classic ‘Red smear’ stuff straight out of McCarthy’s playbook.  This criminal wants to start WWIII with Russia to cover up his own domestic crimes!

 

Comments at this video:

screen-shot-2016-10-29-at-10-01-55-am

screen-shot-2016-10-29-at-10-31-11-am

Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post proves that the liberals love criminals and will do anything to stop prosecutors from preventing crimes.

 

And there is more this week:  Julian ASSANGE The next leak will lead to the arrest of Hillary CLINTON – YouTube

Republicans renew calls for Clinton to be denied security briefings after the DNC did this to Trump and it was totally illegal for them to do this to him.  Meanwhile, it is quite legal to do this to Hillary because of her past mishandling of information and attempts at a coverup.

 

A review of all this:  Hillary’s 33,000 emails might not be ‘missing’ after all | New York Post

 

In a May interview with FBI agents, an executive with the Denver contractor that maintained Clinton’s private server revealed that an underling didn’t bleach-clean all her subpoenaed emails, just ones he stored in a data file he used to transfer the emails from the server to Clinton’s aides, who in turn sorted them for delivery to Congress.

 

The Platte River Networks executive, whose name was redacted from the interview report, said PRN tech Paul Combetta “created a ‘vehicle’ to transfer email files from the live mailboxes of [Clinton Executive Services Corp.] email accounts [and] then later used BleachBit software to shred the ‘vehicle,’ but the email content still existed in the live email accounts.”

 

And this is why the FBI, with many agents furious about how the case was handled by top DNC operatives there, wanted the case reopened and now the treasure trove of filth from Weiner, husband of Hillary’s top aide de camp, has oped the spigot to an ocean of crimes.

 

The mess in DC was supposed to be a mountain out of a mole hill as far as the US media giants were concerned.  But that mole hill grew bigger and bigger as more manure was added until it really was becoming a true mountain so the media giants and the DNC conspired with Obama and Hillary to bury the mountain of sh•t.

 

Judge Napolitano: What happened to the FBI? It’s been corrupted by Obama and his team | Fox News

 

 The FBI began investigating the Clinton email scandal in the spring of 2015, when The New York Times revealed Clinton’s use of a private email address for her official governmental work and the fact that she did not preserve the emails on State Department servers, contrary to federal law. After an initial collection of evidence and a round of interviews, agents and senior managers gathered in the summer of 2015 to discuss how to proceed. It was obvious to all that a prima-facie case could be made for espionage, theft of government property and obstruction of justice charges. The consensus was to proceed with a formal criminal investigation.

 

The assumption was, Hillary did this to hide crimes.  And it turns out according to the Wikileaks releases that this fear she was committing crimes was !00% correct.  The only issue left is, exactly what crimes did she commit and who helped her?  And this leads straight to the heart of who runs the DNC and the White House itself.

 

Already, the head of the DNC during the convention had to resign due to her illicit works.  The US media screamed about Trump touching women while ignoring VP Biden doing worse with little girls while they were inside the Congress building in DC itself!  All this stupid sex stuff was unevenly reported by the media who is in cahoots with Clinton crimes.

 

Six months later, the senior FBI agent in charge of that investigation resigned from the case and retired from the FBI because he felt the case was going “sideways”; that’s law enforcement jargon for “nowhere by design.” John Giacalone had been the chief of the New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., field offices of the FBI and, at the time of his “sideways” comment, was the chief of the FBI National Security Branch.

 

The reason for the “sideways” comment must have been Giacalone’s realization that DOJ and FBI senior management had decided that the investigation would not work in tandem with a federal grand jury. That is nearly fatal to any government criminal case. In criminal cases, the FBI and the DOJ cannot issue subpoenas for testimony or for tangible things; only grand juries can.

 

This is the infamous ‘cover up’ at work.  Nixon supposedly taught us all about this and Watergate was supposed to stop this but look at today when corruption reigns in our elections and money flows in from overseas to corrupt candidates lying about their intentions to voters.

 

Giacalone knew that without a grand jury, the FBI would be toothless, as it would have no subpoena power. He also knew that without a grand jury, the FBI would have a hard time persuading any federal judge to issue search warrants. A judge would perceive the need for search warrants to be not acute in such a case because to a judge, the absence of a grand jury can only mean a case is “sideways” and not a serious investigation….

 

Did President Obama fear being a defense witness at Hillary Clinton’s criminal trial? Did he so fear being succeeded in office by Donald Trump that he ordered the FBI to exonerate Clinton, the rule of law be damned? Did the FBI lose its reputation for fidelity to law, bravery under stress and integrity at all times?

 

The real question here is, what did Obama do that was highly illegal?  We now know that he used a fake name to call or text Clinton on her illegal servers and the only reason for him to do this is, they were doing something explosively illegal.  We are near the end of this business, the following mess can’t be avoided even if, like President Ford, everyone is pardoned so there are no trials!  That stunk to high heaven back then and stinks today.

 

sunset borger

side picture begging boneEmail:

emeinel@fairpoint.net

MAILING ADDRESS:

EMS NEWS

209 Greenhollow Rd

Petersburgh, NY 12138

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’

Click on the Pegasus icon on the right sidebar to donate via Paypal.

 

sunset borger

 

10 Comments

Filed under .money matters

10 responses to “Podesta Illegally Blames Putin For DNC Conspiracies Against Voters

  1. Jim R

    The Automatic Earth speculates:

    Throw Huma Under the Bus?
    October 29, 2016 Posted by Raúl Ilargi Meijer at 1:30 pm
    Tagged with: Abedin, classified, Clinton, Comey, FBI, Hillary, server, Weiner

    There is so much in innuendo and guesses and biased opinion floating around on this ‘morning after’ the Comey bombshell that the only option we have is to read and watch a ton of stuff and see what sticks. One thing that definitely should stick was published late last night by Paul Sperry for the New York Post.

    Will the media propaganda caravan now turn on Hillary to save its face? I would predict perhaps not immediately, since they bet a lot on their horse. But give it a few days and they may conclude it’s high time to cut their losses. And so may a lot of other parties involved.

    The thumbscrews put on Huma this morning by the campaign must be hurting. Can she cut another immunity deal or will she end up under the bus?

  2. Ken

    If Obama gave Clinton a Presidential Pardon that would stop the investigation in its tracks. Just like Ford’s pardon of Nixon stopped the Watergate investigation.

    Trump supporters would be furious, but they would not have voted for Hillary anyway. The media and democratic and minority voters might be suspicious, but enough would give Hillary the benefit of a doubt that a pardon is still a viable strategy for Clinton.

  3. emsnews

    It would destroy the Democratic Party, that’s all.

  4. KHS71

    And the problem with destroying the demoncratic party is what? Same for the republicans.

    This has been the craziest election in my lifetime and I have voted in every presidential election since 1972. I am glad it is happening. The hacked e-mails are fantastic. They have shown Washington DC for what it is, a group of bought and paid for politicians with no concern for the every day person such as you and I.

    I am retired and will turn 63 in two weeks and probably will not live another 10 years due to my heart issues. I worry more about my 2.5 year old granddaughter and my 3 year old and 1 year old great grandsons.

    Trump 2016

  5. Mewswithaview

    The strange tale of a dating site’s attacks on WikiLeaks founder Assange – http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article110904727.html

  6. Christian W

    @ # 1

    Will the media propaganda caravan now turn on Hillary to save its face?

    WSJ September 29, 2016

  7. Christian W

    WSJ October 27, 2016

    HAHAHA talk about Flipflopping.

  8. emsnews

    HAHAHA. Yes. By the way, 63 years old ain’t old. I turned 66 last week. Still rolling along merrily.

  9. KHS71

    Yes, 63 is now not considered “old”. However, my dad died at 57 due to a second heart attack in his sleep. He had quadruple by-pass in the mid 1970’s when it was being pioneered. I have lived on a pacemaker for the past 19 years. Implanted when I was 43. I had developed complete heart block. I am on my third pacemaker now, the latest being a bi-ventricular defib. I have had 2 ablations, 1 cardio-version, have developed cardiomyopathy, have 1/2 to 3/4 of my heart function, and live on rate responsive mode because my heart does not react to increase my heart rate when walking or moving. Have atrial arrhythmia problems. Genetics are hell. You are a very lucky person even though you have had previous medical issues as you have told us. I can not complain, I still live a basically normal life.

  10. emsnews

    My sincere condolences! My father had the exact same thing happen to him, he was operated on by the pioneer of heart surgery way back in 1978. But lived until recently so keep up your faith in yourself! Modern medical practices are amazing.

Leave a comment